This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 17, 2020. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Phase 3 Workstreams
Julia Lindpaintner edited this page Mar 15, 2019
·
2 revisions
Goals | Action items |
---|---|
Create a framework for evaluating federated data effort case studies | Learn how the Federal Data Strategy and others are evaluating use cases; Learn how FNS thinks about the impact of implementing the data validation service and the biggest blockers they have encountered |
Tee up use cases for future engagement | Interview other use cases systematically |
Share our framework and findings | Publish and present our framework |
- We don’t yet have a clear way to evaluate/categorize different use cases
- We do not have a strong sense of what tools/resources would be most valuable
- We don’t have enough information from the use cases we’ve contacted to decide which to engage with
- We don’t have a clear ask of other use cases
- We can’t engage with another use case in earnest without a clearer framework for evaluation
We need to be able to clearly position the U.S. Data Federation in the landscape of government-wide data initiatives.
Goals | Action items |
---|---|
Clearly define the way the U.S. Data Strategy relates to other data initiatives | Meet with Federal Data Strategy (particularly the Access, Use, and Augmentation Working Group); Identify other groups to align with; Continue to compare notes with the 10x Eligibility Rules Service team |
Create/update the public profile of the U.S. Data Federation | Identify the best platform for communicating our efforts; Decide whether branding the initiative separately from others is the best course of action; Update current website or create new content elsewhere |
- We are not aware of specific opportunities to partner with/learn from/serve the Federal Data Strategy or other government-wide data initiatives
- Alignment with other data initiatives will increase the chances of long-term success and sustainability of the U.S. Data Federation
- There should be a place online where people can easily learn about the work we’re doing
Goals | Action items |
---|---|
Design a service/software offering | Come up with a name for the tool; Decide on long-term hosting solution; Reassess technical setup of tool apart from FNS use case; Develop pricing and cost-recoverability strategy; Prototype as needed (e.g., if we discover the UI version has applicability in other use cases) |
Collect additional use cases for this tool | Create marketing/outreach materials that focus on the tool (not the U.S. Data Federation as a whole); Conduct active outreach to groups we know of or learn about who are doing things similar to FNS use case for interviews/data |
- We want to continue to develop this tool, independent of the progress of the U.S. Data Federation as a whole (i.e., it might or might not ultimately exist under that umbrella)
- Making the tool reusable may mean changing some of the way it is coded and/or developing GUIs
- We need a concrete understanding of other potential applications of the tool in order to design the best reusable version
- We do not feel it is imperative that we create prototypes or working software for another use case, but do need a deep understanding of at least one other use case
- Another use case from within FNS would be acceptable, but connecting with use cases that are different would be preferable
Goals | Action items |
---|---|
Support the implementation of the FNS Data Validation Service with Kansas and Montana | Continue to work with Kansas and Montana/Colyar to support their testing; Address performance concerns (what happens if service goes down, etc); Create a threat/risk model; Create user documentation |
Help craft a long-term plan for FNS’ implementation of the Data Validation Service post-Phase 3 | Evaluate long-term hosting options; Understand what resources FNS has to devote to this effort; Craft a proposal for long-term sustainment of the effort; Create documentation/user guides for state-level implementation of the validation service; Synthesize all research/findings related to FNS use case and deliver to FNS |
- We do not need to support the implementation of the data validation service in states beyond Kansas and Montana
- We cannot guarantee support of the implementation of the data validation service beyond Phase 3
- FNS can’t independently manage the implementation of the data validation service
Goals | Action items |
---|---|
Demonstrate reusability of the Django data ingest tool | Further explore, define, and refine the features of the Django data ingest tool; Define the features needed to make it useful to other use cases; Create documentation around the application of the tool to new projects |
Engage deeply with another partner | Pick a partner; Define the problem they are trying to solve and how our tool can help; Create a roadmap for working with them; Define and create a prototype |
- We are open to the second use case testing the same functionality that we’ve developed for FNS or exploring another feature of the Django data ingest tool (e.g. aggregation, web interface)
- We do not need to put this use case into production
- We cannot guarantee our partners that we will be able to see this through to production