Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#38 Check type before updating version field #39

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ercpe
Copy link
Contributor

@ercpe ercpe commented Mar 18, 2024

Application may already use reversion but not implement HandleRefModel in every model under control of reversion. Check the objects type before updating the version field.

Application may already use `reversion` but not implement `HandleRefModel` in every model under control of reversion. Check the objects type before updating the `version` field.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.01%. Comparing base (b7af826) to head (bd9b78a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #39      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.98%   86.01%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files           6        6              
  Lines         478      479       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits          411      412       +1     
  Misses         67       67              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@vegu vegu merged commit a6aabfd into 20c:main Mar 18, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

handleref tries to update version field on every model under reversion control
2 participants