-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
storyinclude_en_style_chicago.tw
492 lines (327 loc) · 13.5 KB
/
storyinclude_en_style_chicago.tw
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
::en_style_chicago_plagiarism_01
! Is this plagiarism?
> "Canadians may well be approaching another such juncture today as the result \
of two seemingly unrelated by in fact closely connected developments...".<sup>1</sup>
> ...
> <ol><li>Michael Hart, "Lessons from Canada's History as a Trading Nation," \
//International Journal// 58, no.1 (2002): 40, doi:10.2307/40203811.</li></ol>
> ...
> __Bibliography__
> Hart, Michael. "Lessons from Canada's History as a Trading Nation." \
//International Journal// 58, no.1 (2002): 25-42, doi:10.2307/40203811.
<<AnswerChoices
"en_style_chicago_plagiarism_01" $next_common_passage "hide"
"en_style_chicago_plagiarism_01_include_answer_yes" "Yes, this is plagiarism"
"en_style_chicago_plagiarism_01_include_answer_no" "No, this is not plagiarism"
>>
::en_style_chicago_plagiarism_01_include_answer_yes
!! Incorrect
This is not plagiarism.
Copying information word-for-word from a source is okay as long as you put \
quotation marks around the copied information and give credit to the source.
<<AnswerStatus
"en_style_chicago_plagiarism_01"
"incorrect"
>>
::en_style_chicago_plagiarism_01_include_answer_no
!! Correct
You're right! This is not plagiarism because there are quotation marks around \
the copied information and the source is credited.
<<AnswerStatus
"en_style_chicago_plagiarism_01"
"correct"
>>
::en_style_chicago_plagiarism_02
! Is this plagiarism?
How about this?
Taking someone's ideas or words, putting them into your own words, and crediting \
the source.
> Since Canada had such a small economy it did not have much to say when it came \
to making trading deals with other nations.<sup>1</sup>
> ...
> <ol><li>Michael Hart, "Lessons from Canada's History as a Trading Nation," \
//International Journal// 58, no.1 (2002): 42, doi:10.2307/40203811.</li></ol>
> ...
> __Bibliography__
> Hart, Michael. "Lessons from Canada's History as a Trading Nation." \
//International Journal// 58, no.1 (2002): 25-42, doi:10.2307/40203811.
<<AnswerChoices
"en_style_chicago_plagiarism_02" $next_common_passage "hide"
"en_style_chicago_plagiarism_02_include_answer_yes" "Yes, this is plagiarism"
"en_style_chicago_plagiarism_02_include_answer_no" "No, this is not plagiarism"
>>
::en_style_chicago_plagiarism_02_include_answer_yes
!! Incorrect
Actually, this is not plagiarism: it's paraphrasing.
Paraphrasing is fine as long as you credit the source and the paraphrase is \
entirely in your words—just changing a couple words here and there \
doesn't cut it.
<<AnswerStatus
"en_style_chicago_plagiarism_02"
"incorrect"
>>
::en_style_chicago_plagiarism_02_include_answer_no
!! Correct
You're right! This is not plagiarism. It's paraphrasing.
Paraphrasing is fine as long as you credit the source and the paraphrase is \
entirely in your words—just changing a couple words here and there \
doesn't cut it.
<<AnswerStatus
"en_style_chicago_plagiarism_02"
"correct"
>>
::en_style_chicago_knowledge_01
! Common knowledge or not?
One sentence is common knowledge and the other is not. Pick the one that needs \
to be cited.
''Sentence A''
> Canada became a Confederation in 1867.
''Sentence B''
> Scholars and politicians are divided on whether Confederation constitutes an \
Act imposed by Britain or an agreement between sovereign colonies.
<<AnswerChoices
"en_style_chicago_knowledge_01" $next_common_passage "hide"
"en_style_chicago_knowledge_01_include_answer_a" "Sentence A"
"en_style_chicago_knowledge_01_include_answer_b" "Sentence B"
>>
::en_style_chicago_knowledge_01_include_answer_a
!! Incorrect
Actually, this is common knowledge and doesn't need to be cited. (But when in \
doubt, it's better to cite than not.)
<<AnswerStatus
"en_style_chicago_knowledge_01"
"incorrect"
>>
::en_style_chicago_knowledge_01_include_answer_b
!! Correct
You're right! This needs to be cited. It's from this book:
> Belshaw, J. //Canadian History: Post-Confederation.// British Columbia: \
BCcampus, 2016. """https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/671""".
<<AnswerStatus
"en_style_chicago_knowledge_01"
"correct"
>>
::en_style_chicago_knowledge_02
! Common knowledge or not?
One sentence is common knowledge and the other is not. Pick the one that needs \
to be cited.
''Sentence A''
> The Mexican peso devaluation in 1994 seriously affected the country's \
financial markets.
''Sentence B''
> The peso is the currency used in the country of Mexico.
<<AnswerChoices
"en_style_chicago_knowledge_02" $next_common_passage "hide"
"en_style_chicago_knowledge_02_include_answer_a" "Sentence A"
"en_style_chicago_knowledge_02_include_answer_b" "Sentence B"
>>
::en_style_chicago_knowledge_02_include_answer_a
!! Correct
You're right! This needs to be cited. It's from this journal article:
> Goldberg, C.S. and J.M. Veitch "Exchange rate crisis and firm values: A case \
study of Mexico's tequila crisis." //Journal of American Academy of Business// \
2, no. 2 (2003): 545-549.
<<AnswerStatus
"en_style_chicago_knowledge_02"
"correct"
>>
::en_style_chicago_knowledge_02_include_answer_b
!! Incorrect
Actually, this is common knowledge and doesn't need to be cited. (But when in \
doubt, it's better to cite than not.)
<<AnswerStatus
"en_style_chicago_knowledge_02"
"incorrect"
>>
::en_style_chicago_knowledge_03
! Common knowledge or not?
One sentence is common knowledge and the other is not. Pick the one that needs \
to be cited.
''Sentence A''
> France is the third largest country in Europe.
''Sentence B''
> Paris is the Capitol of France.
<<AnswerChoices
"en_style_chicago_knowledge_03" $next_common_passage "hide"
"en_style_chicago_knowledge_03_include_answer_a" "Sentence A"
"en_style_chicago_knowledge_03_include_answer_b" "Sentence B"
>>
::en_style_chicago_knowledge_03_include_answer_a
!! Correct
You're right! This needs to be cited. It's from this website:
> Chepkemoi, Joyce. "The Largest Countries in Europe." WorldAtlas. Accessed \
May 31, 2018. """http://worldatlas.com/articles/the-largest-countries-in-europe.html""".
<<AnswerStatus
"en_style_chicago_knowledge_03"
"correct"
>>
::en_style_chicago_knowledge_03_include_answer_b
!! Incorrect
Actually, this is common knowledge and doesn't need to be cited. (But when in \
doubt, it's better to cite than not.)
<<AnswerStatus
"en_style_chicago_knowledge_03"
"incorrect"
>>
::en_style_chicago_quotvpara_01_include
! Quoting and Paraphrasing: Differences
Maybe it would help to show the difference between quoting and paraphrasing, and \
how to do each correctly using Chicago style.
Imagine that this passage from an eBook is one that you would like to use in \
your essay.
> The form of rule established by Diocletian at the end of the 3^^rd^^ century \
was effectively a rule of four: two Augusti (principle emperors) and two Caesares \
(or Ceasars, second-tier emperors), overseeing an empire that was split east and \
west...
::en_style_chicago_quotvpara_02_include
! Quoting and Paraphrasing: Differences
!! Quoting
A quotation uses exactly the same words as those found in the source material \
and puts them in quotation marks. Here's what a quotation looks like with a \
proper in-text reference in Chicago style:
> "The form of rule established by Diocletian at the end of the 3^^rd^^ century \
was effectively a rule of four: two Augusti (principle emperors) and two Caesares \
(or Ceasars, second-tier emperors), overseeing an empire that was split east and \
west...".<sup>1</sup>
> ...
> <ol><li>Andrew Leach, //Rome// (Oxford: Polity Press, 2016), 77, Proquest \
Ebook Central.</li></ol>
> ...
> __Bibliography__
> Leach, Andrew. //Rome.// Oxford: Polity Press. 2016. ProQuest Ebook Central.
::en_style_chicago_quotvpara_03_include
! Quoting and Paraphrasing: Differences
!! Paraphrasing
A paraphrase is another author’s ideas expressed //in your own words//—\
without quotation marks, since it's no longer a word-for-word quotation. And \
just changing a few words from the original doesn't count!
> A tetrarchy was used to rule Rome for a time at the end of the 3^^rd^^ century \
and into the 4^^th^^. This form of rule consisted of one emperor in the east and \
one in the west, known as Augusti. Each of these emperors had a second in command \
known as a Caesar, who would eventually gain the throne upon each emperor's \
retirement or death.<sup>1</sup>
> ...
> <ol><li>Andrew Leach, //Rome// (Oxford: Polity Press, 2016), 77, Proquest \
Ebook Central.</li></ol>
> ...
> __Bibliography__
> Leach, Andrew. //Rome.// Oxford: Polity Press. 2016. ProQuest Ebook Central.
::en_style_chicago_quotvpara_04
! Quoting and Paraphrasing: Differences
!! Quoting
Now that you know the difference between quoting and paraphrasing, let's make \
sure you can do it properly in an actual assignment. Imagine that this is your \
essay so far:
> In an interview, the Ukranian Health Minister, Anatoly Y. Romanenko ''advised \
residents not to have outings in the woods north of Kiev, near the 18-mile zone \
from which 135,000 people were evacuated two years ago.''
Is this plagiarism?
<<AnswerChoices
"en_style_chicago_quotvpara_04" $next_common_passage "hide"
"en_style_chicago_quotvpara_04_include_answer_yes" "Yes, this is plagiarism"
"en_style_chicago_quotvpara_04_include_answer_no" "No, this is not plagiarism"
>>
::en_style_chicago_quotvpara_04_include_answer_yes
!! Correct
Good catch! This is plagiarism because the quotation is not in quotation marks \
and the source is not cited!
<<AnswerStatus
"en_style_chicago_quotvpara_04"
"correct"
>>
::en_style_chicago_quotvpara_04_include_answer_no
!! Incorrect
Oh yes, it is! This is plagiarism because the quotation is not in quotation \
marks and the source is not cited.
<<AnswerStatus
"en_style_chicago_quotvpara_04"
"incorrect"
>>
::en_style_chicago_quotvpara_05
! Quoting and Paraphrasing: Differences
!! Quoting Revisions
Click "Fix it" to see how to quote without plagiarising.
> In an interview, the Ukranian Health Minister, Anatoly Y. Romanenko ''advised \
residents not to have outings in the woods north of Kiev, near the 18-mile zone \
from which 135,000 people were evacuated two years ago.''
<<AnswerChoices
"en_style_chicago_quotvpara_05" $next_common_passage "hide"
"en_style_chicago_quotvpara_05_include_answer_fix" "Fix it"
>>
::en_style_chicago_quotvpara_05_include_answer_fix
!! Fixed
> In an interview, the Ukranian Health Minister, Anatoly Y. Romanenko "advised \
residents not to have outings in the woods north of Kiev, near the 18-mile zone \
from which 135,000 people were evacuated two years ago."<sup>1</sup>
> ...
> __Note__
> 1. Felicity Barringer, "Fear of Chernobyl Radiation Lingers for the people \
of Kiev," //New York Times,// May 23, 1998, \
"""https://ezproxy.acadiau.ca:9443/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.acadiau.ca:9443/docview/426829329?accountid=8172"""
> ...
> __Bibliography__
> Barringer, Felicity. "Fear of Chernobyl Radiation Lingers for the people \
of Kiev." //New York Times,// May 23, 1998. \
"""https://ezproxy.acadiau.ca:9443/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.acadiau.ca:9443/docview/426829329?accountid=8172"""
<<AnswerStatus
"en_style_chicago_quotvpara_05"
"fixed"
>>
::en_style_chicago_quotvpara_06
! Quoting and Paraphrasing: Differences
!! Paraphrasing
> Although the Ukranian Health Minister recommended that residents did not go in \
the woods near Kiev, he continued to disregard the worries residents had \
concerning radiation.
Is this plagiarism?
<<AnswerChoices
"en_style_chicago_quotvpara_06" $next_common_passage "hide"
"en_style_chicago_quotvpara_06_include_answer_yes" "Yes, this is plagiarism"
"en_style_chicago_quotvpara_06_include_answer_no" "No, this is not plagiarism"
>>
::en_style_chicago_quotvpara_06_include_answer_yes
!! Correct
Definitely. The author has used their own words and sentence structure but \
forgotten to cite the source!
<<AnswerStatus
"en_style_chicago_quotvpara_06"
"correct"
>>
::en_style_chicago_quotvpara_06_include_answer_no
!! Incorrect
Actually, it IS plagiarism. Although they used their own words and sentence \
structure, they have forgotten to cite the source!
<<AnswerStatus
"en_style_chicago_quotvpara_06"
"incorrect"
>>
::en_style_chicago_quotvpara_07
! Quoting and Paraphrasing: Differences
!! Paraphrasing Revisions
Click "Fix it" to see how to paraphrase without plagiarising.
> Although the Ukranian Health Minister recommended that residents did not go in \
the woods near Kiev, he continued to disregard the worries residents had \
concerning radiation.
<<AnswerChoices
"en_style_chicago_quotvpara_07" $next_common_passage "hide"
"en_style_chicago_quotvpara_07_include_answer_fix" "Fix it"
>>
::en_style_chicago_quotvpara_07_include_answer_fix
!! Fixed
> Although the Ukranian Health Minister recommended that residents did not go in \
the woods near Kiev, he continued to disregard the worries residents had \
concerning radiation.<sup>1</sup>
> ...
> __Note__
> 1. Felicity Barringer, "Fear of Chernobyl Radiation Lingers for the people \
of Kiev," //New York Times,// May 23, 1998, \
"""https://ezproxy.acadiau.ca:9443/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.acadiau.ca:9443/docview/426829329?accountid=8172"""
> ...
> __Bibliography__
> Barringer, Felicity. "Fear of Chernobyl Radiation Lingers for the people \
of Kiev." //New York Times,// May 23, 1998. \
"""https://ezproxy.acadiau.ca:9443/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.acadiau.ca:9443/docview/426829329?accountid=8172"""
<<AnswerStatus
"en_style_chicago_quotvpara_07"
"fixed"
>>