-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
Project Meeting 2017.06.09
Ben Stabler edited this page Jun 9, 2017
·
14 revisions
- We'd like to split out the input table loading into a new first step
- We'll add the input tables as filenames to the settings file and explicitly read in the tables as opposed to relying on the orca lazy loading
- This will make it easier for a user to get started and to customize/extend the models
- We can also move the orca dynamic columns into expression files eventually (but this may come later due to resources)
- @Ben to start on this, based on what we're doing with the BCA and PopSim projects
- This would be under Task 6 - Completing Phase 1 Models
- @Stefan wants to build the existing DaySim parcel buffering procedures into ActivitySim
- This will require a new sub-module, maybe activitysim.abm.models.buffering
- It will need its own example/test, probably PSRC data
- It will use an input loading step
- @PSRC to get started by forking the repo and RSG to assist as needed
- We're almost at the point where we can contribute the first working version of populationSim into ActivitySim
- This will require a new sub-model, maybe activitysim.popsim
- It will need its own example/test, probably MTC data to be consistent with the ABM example? We're currently using the Corvallis-Albany-Lebanon region of Oregon as our test
- It will use an input loading step
- We plan to fork the repo, add this, and issue a pull request
- Anyone interested in setting up the MTC example to get familiar with it and to help build out this new module?
- We're going to get back into this work now that the populationSim work is slowing down
- We're planning to speed up the pandas queries and formally integrate this into the code base
- It will be under activitysim.core and the activitysim.abm example will be updated as well
- @Jeff to do this next
- Starting in a few weeks, Jeff will be halftime for the summer
- We're planning to complete the tasks above and then start on logsums
- We've spent about 40% of the phase 3 funds
- Can we still accelerate the funding in the second half of the year?