Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

contribution guideline: remove zero checker #103

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 5, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Antonboom
Copy link
Owner

Closes #75

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 5, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9379415121

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 93.793%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9371927791: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2025
Relevant Lines: 2159

💛 - Coveralls

@Antonboom Antonboom merged commit 654e0ae into master Jun 5, 2024
3 checks passed
@Antonboom Antonboom changed the title contribution: remove zero checker contribution guideline: remove zero checker Jun 5, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9379426186

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 93.793%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9371927791: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2025
Relevant Lines: 2159

💛 - Coveralls

@ccoVeille
Copy link
Contributor

ccoVeille commented Jun 5, 2024

Replying here as other is locked.

#75 (comment)

OK, it's true that the existence of Zero vs Empty in testify is already a problem.

Suggesting to replace one by another would be a problem on code already using testifylint that would have to change valid tests.

So I'm OK with your choice

@Antonboom Antonboom deleted the docs/rm-zero branch June 25, 2024 18:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

zero: use zero instead of asserr.Equal(t, 0, v)
3 participants