Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
1371 lines (1060 loc) · 45.7 KB

core-appendix.adoc

File metadata and controls

1371 lines (1060 loc) · 45.7 KB

Appendix

XML Schemas

This part of the appendix lists XML schemas related to the core container.

The util schema

As the name implies, the util tags deal with common, utility configuration issues, such as configuring collections, referencing constants, and suchlike. To use the tags in the util schema, you need to have the following preamble at the top of your Spring XML configuration file; the text in the snippet below references the correct schema so that the tags in the util namespace are available to you.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xmlns:util="http://www.springframework.org/schema/util" xsi:schemaLocation="
		http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
		http://www.springframework.org/schema/util http://www.springframework.org/schema/util/spring-util.xsd"> <!-- bean definitions here -->

</beans>

<util:constant/>

Before…​

<bean id="..." class="...">
	<property name="isolation">
		<bean id="java.sql.Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE"
				class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.FieldRetrievingFactoryBean" />
	</property>
</bean>

The above configuration uses a Spring FactoryBean implementation, the FieldRetrievingFactoryBean, to set the value of the isolation property on a bean to the value of the java.sql.Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE constant. This is all well and good, but it is a tad verbose and (unnecessarily) exposes Spring’s internal plumbing to the end user.

The following XML Schema-based version is more concise and clearly expresses the developer’s intent ('inject this constant value'), and it just reads better.

<bean id="..." class="...">
	<property name="isolation">
		<util:constant static-field="java.sql.Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE"/>
	</property>
</bean>
Setting a bean property or constructor arg from a field value

FieldRetrievingFactoryBean is a FactoryBean which retrieves a static or non-static field value. It is typically used for retrieving public static final constants, which may then be used to set a property value or constructor arg for another bean.

Find below an example which shows how a static field is exposed, by using the staticField property:

<bean id="myField"
		class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.FieldRetrievingFactoryBean">
	<property name="staticField" value="java.sql.Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE"/>
</bean>

There is also a convenience usage form where the static field is specified as the bean name:

<bean id="java.sql.Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE"
		class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.FieldRetrievingFactoryBean"/>

This does mean that there is no longer any choice in what the bean id is (so any other bean that refers to it will also have to use this longer name), but this form is very concise to define, and very convenient to use as an inner bean since the id doesn’t have to be specified for the bean reference:

<bean id="..." class="...">
	<property name="isolation">
		<bean id="java.sql.Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE"
				class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.FieldRetrievingFactoryBean" />
	</property>
</bean>

It is also possible to access a non-static (instance) field of another bean, as described in the API documentation for the FieldRetrievingFactoryBean class.

Injecting enum values into beans as either property or constructor arguments is very easy to do in Spring, in that you don’t actually have to do anything or know anything about the Spring internals (or even about classes such as the FieldRetrievingFactoryBean). Let’s look at an example to see how easy injecting an enum value is; consider this enum:

package javax.persistence;

public enum PersistenceContextType {

	TRANSACTION,
	EXTENDED
}

Now consider a setter of type PersistenceContextType:

package example;

public class Client {

	private PersistenceContextType persistenceContextType;

	public void setPersistenceContextType(PersistenceContextType type) {
		this.persistenceContextType = type;
	}
}

and the corresponding bean definition:

<bean class="example.Client">
	<property name="persistenceContextType" value="TRANSACTION"/>
</bean>

<util:property-path/>

Before…​

<!-- target bean to be referenced by name -->
<bean id="testBean" class="org.springframework.beans.TestBean" scope="prototype">
	<property name="age" value="10"/>
	<property name="spouse">
		<bean class="org.springframework.beans.TestBean">
			<property name="age" value="11"/>
		</bean>
	</property>
</bean>

<!-- will result in 10, which is the value of property 'age' of bean 'testBean' -->
<bean id="testBean.age" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPathFactoryBean"/>

The above configuration uses a Spring FactoryBean implementation, the PropertyPathFactoryBean, to create a bean (of type int) called testBean.age that has a value equal to the age property of the testBean bean.

After…​

<!-- target bean to be referenced by name -->
<bean id="testBean" class="org.springframework.beans.TestBean" scope="prototype">
	<property name="age" value="10"/>
	<property name="spouse">
		<bean class="org.springframework.beans.TestBean">
			<property name="age" value="11"/>
		</bean>
	</property>
</bean>

<!-- will result in 10, which is the value of property 'age' of bean 'testBean' -->
<util:property-path id="name" path="testBean.age"/>

The value of the path attribute of the <property-path/> tag follows the form beanName.beanProperty.

Using <util:property-path/> to set a bean property or constructor-argument

PropertyPathFactoryBean is a FactoryBean that evaluates a property path on a given target object. The target object can be specified directly or via a bean name. This value may then be used in another bean definition as a property value or constructor argument.

Here’s an example where a path is used against another bean, by name:

// target bean to be referenced by name
<bean id="person" class="org.springframework.beans.TestBean" scope="prototype">
	<property name="age" value="10"/>
	<property name="spouse">
		<bean class="org.springframework.beans.TestBean">
			<property name="age" value="11"/>
		</bean>
	</property>
</bean>

// will result in 11, which is the value of property 'spouse.age' of bean 'person'
<bean id="theAge"
		class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPathFactoryBean">
	<property name="targetBeanName" value="person"/>
	<property name="propertyPath" value="spouse.age"/>
</bean>

In this example, a path is evaluated against an inner bean:

<!-- will result in 12, which is the value of property 'age' of the inner bean -->
<bean id="theAge"
		class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPathFactoryBean">
	<property name="targetObject">
		<bean class="org.springframework.beans.TestBean">
			<property name="age" value="12"/>
		</bean>
	</property>
	<property name="propertyPath" value="age"/>
</bean>

There is also a shortcut form, where the bean name is the property path.

<!-- will result in 10, which is the value of property 'age' of bean 'person' -->
<bean id="person.age"
		class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPathFactoryBean"/>

This form does mean that there is no choice in the name of the bean. Any reference to it will also have to use the same id, which is the path. Of course, if used as an inner bean, there is no need to refer to it at all:

<bean id="..." class="...">
	<property name="age">
		<bean id="person.age"
				class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPathFactoryBean"/>
	</property>
</bean>

The result type may be specifically set in the actual definition. This is not necessary for most use cases, but can be of use for some. Please see the Javadocs for more info on this feature.

<util:properties/>

Before…​

<!-- creates a java.util.Properties instance with values loaded from the supplied location -->
<bean id="jdbcConfiguration" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertiesFactoryBean">
	<property name="location" value="classpath:com/foo/jdbc-production.properties"/>
</bean>

The above configuration uses a Spring FactoryBean implementation, the PropertiesFactoryBean, to instantiate a java.util.Properties instance with values loaded from the supplied Resource location).

After…​

<!-- creates a java.util.Properties instance with values loaded from the supplied location -->
<util:properties id="jdbcConfiguration" location="classpath:com/foo/jdbc-production.properties"/>

<util:list/>

Before…​

<!-- creates a java.util.List instance with values loaded from the supplied 'sourceList' -->
<bean id="emails" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.ListFactoryBean">
	<property name="sourceList">
		<list>
			<value>pechorin@hero.org</value>
			<value>raskolnikov@slums.org</value>
			<value>stavrogin@gov.org</value>
			<value>porfiry@gov.org</value>
		</list>
	</property>
</bean>

The above configuration uses a Spring FactoryBean implementation, the ListFactoryBean, to create a java.util.List instance initialized with values taken from the supplied sourceList.

After…​

<!-- creates a java.util.List instance with the supplied values -->
<util:list id="emails">
	<value>pechorin@hero.org</value>
	<value>raskolnikov@slums.org</value>
	<value>stavrogin@gov.org</value>
	<value>porfiry@gov.org</value>
</util:list>

You can also explicitly control the exact type of List that will be instantiated and populated via the use of the list-class attribute on the <util:list/> element. For example, if we really need a java.util.LinkedList to be instantiated, we could use the following configuration:

<util:list id="emails" list-class="java.util.LinkedList">
	<value>jackshaftoe@vagabond.org</value>
	<value>eliza@thinkingmanscrumpet.org</value>
	<value>vanhoek@pirate.org</value>
	<value>d'Arcachon@nemesis.org</value>
</util:list>

If no list-class attribute is supplied, a List implementation will be chosen by the container.

<util:map/>

Before…​

<!-- creates a java.util.Map instance with values loaded from the supplied 'sourceMap' -->
<bean id="emails" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.MapFactoryBean">
	<property name="sourceMap">
		<map>
			<entry key="pechorin" value="pechorin@hero.org"/>
			<entry key="raskolnikov" value="raskolnikov@slums.org"/>
			<entry key="stavrogin" value="stavrogin@gov.org"/>
			<entry key="porfiry" value="porfiry@gov.org"/>
		</map>
	</property>
</bean>

The above configuration uses a Spring FactoryBean implementation, the MapFactoryBean, to create a java.util.Map instance initialized with key-value pairs taken from the supplied 'sourceMap'.

After…​

<!-- creates a java.util.Map instance with the supplied key-value pairs -->
<util:map id="emails">
	<entry key="pechorin" value="pechorin@hero.org"/>
	<entry key="raskolnikov" value="raskolnikov@slums.org"/>
	<entry key="stavrogin" value="stavrogin@gov.org"/>
	<entry key="porfiry" value="porfiry@gov.org"/>
</util:map>

You can also explicitly control the exact type of Map that will be instantiated and populated via the use of the 'map-class' attribute on the <util:map/> element. For example, if we really need a java.util.TreeMap to be instantiated, we could use the following configuration:

<util:map id="emails" map-class="java.util.TreeMap">
	<entry key="pechorin" value="pechorin@hero.org"/>
	<entry key="raskolnikov" value="raskolnikov@slums.org"/>
	<entry key="stavrogin" value="stavrogin@gov.org"/>
	<entry key="porfiry" value="porfiry@gov.org"/>
</util:map>

If no 'map-class' attribute is supplied, a Map implementation will be chosen by the container.

<util:set/>

Before…​

<!-- creates a java.util.Set instance with values loaded from the supplied 'sourceSet' -->
<bean id="emails" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.SetFactoryBean">
	<property name="sourceSet">
		<set>
			<value>pechorin@hero.org</value>
			<value>raskolnikov@slums.org</value>
			<value>stavrogin@gov.org</value>
			<value>porfiry@gov.org</value>
		</set>
	</property>
</bean>

The above configuration uses a Spring FactoryBean implementation, the SetFactoryBean, to create a java.util.Set instance initialized with values taken from the supplied 'sourceSet'.

After…​

<!-- creates a java.util.Set instance with the supplied values -->
<util:set id="emails">
	<value>pechorin@hero.org</value>
	<value>raskolnikov@slums.org</value>
	<value>stavrogin@gov.org</value>
	<value>porfiry@gov.org</value>
</util:set>

You can also explicitly control the exact type of Set that will be instantiated and populated via the use of the 'set-class' attribute on the <util:set/> element. For example, if we really need a java.util.TreeSet to be instantiated, we could use the following configuration:

<util:set id="emails" set-class="java.util.TreeSet">
	<value>pechorin@hero.org</value>
	<value>raskolnikov@slums.org</value>
	<value>stavrogin@gov.org</value>
	<value>porfiry@gov.org</value>
</util:set>

If no 'set-class' attribute is supplied, a Set implementation will be chosen by the container.

The aop schema

The aop tags deal with configuring all things AOP in Spring: this includes Spring’s own proxy-based AOP framework and Spring’s integration with the AspectJ AOP framework. These tags are comprehensively covered in the chapter entitled Aspect Oriented Programming with Spring.

In the interest of completeness, to use the tags in the aop schema, you need to have the following preamble at the top of your Spring XML configuration file; the text in the following snippet references the correct schema so that the tags in the aop namespace are available to you.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xmlns:aop="http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop" xsi:schemaLocation="
		http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
		http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop/spring-aop.xsd"> <!-- bean definitions here -->

</beans>

The context schema

The context tags deal with ApplicationContext configuration that relates to plumbing - that is, not usually beans that are important to an end-user but rather beans that do a lot of grunt work in Spring, such as BeanfactoryPostProcessors. The following snippet references the correct schema so that the tags in the context namespace are available to you.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context" xsi:schemaLocation="
		http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
		http://www.springframework.org/schema/context http://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context.xsd"> <!-- bean definitions here -->

</beans>

<property-placeholder/>

This element activates the replacement of ${…​} placeholders, resolved against the specified properties file (as a Spring resource location). This element is a convenience mechanism that sets up aPropertyPlaceholderConfigurer for you; if you need more control over the PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer, just define one yourself explicitly.

<annotation-config/>

Activates the Spring infrastructure for various annotations to be detected in bean classes: Spring’s @Required and @Autowired, as well as JSR 250’s @PostConstruct, @PreDestroy and @Resource (if available), and JPA’s @PersistenceContext and @PersistenceUnit (if available). Alternatively, you can choose to activate the individual BeanPostProcessors for those annotations explicitly.

Note

This element does not activate processing of Spring’s @Transactional annotation. Use the <tx:annotation-driven/> element for that purpose.

<component-scan/>

This element is detailed in Annotation-based container configuration.

<load-time-weaver/>

<spring-configured/>

<mbean-export/>

This element is detailed in Configuring annotation based MBean export.

The beans schema

Last but not least we have the tags in the beans schema. These are the same tags that have been in Spring since the very dawn of the framework. Examples of the various tags in the beans schema are not shown here because they are quite comprehensively covered in Dependencies and configuration in detail (and indeed in that entire chapter).

Note that it is possible to add zero or more key / value pairs to <bean/> XML definitions. What, if anything, is done with this extra metadata is totally up to your own custom logic (and so is typically only of use if you are writing your own custom tags as described in the appendix entitled XML Schema Authoring).

Find below an example of the <meta/> tag in the context of a surrounding <bean/> (please note that without any logic to interpret it the metadata is effectively useless as-is).

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="
		http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd">

	<bean id="foo" class="x.y.Foo">
		<meta key="cacheName" value="foo"/>
		<property name="name" value="Rick"/>
	</bean>

</beans>

In the case of the above example, you would assume that there is some logic that will consume the bean definition and set up some caching infrastructure using the supplied metadata.

XML Schema Authoring

Introduction

Since version 2.0, Spring has featured a mechanism for schema-based extensions to the basic Spring XML format for defining and configuring beans. This section is devoted to detailing how you would go about writing your own custom XML bean definition parsers and integrating such parsers into the Spring IoC container.

To facilitate the authoring of configuration files using a schema-aware XML editor, Spring’s extensible XML configuration mechanism is based on XML Schema. If you are not familiar with Spring’s current XML configuration extensions that come with the standard Spring distribution, please first read the appendix entitled[xsd-config].

Creating new XML configuration extensions can be done by following these (relatively) simple steps:

  • Authoring an XML schema to describe your custom element(s).

  • Coding a custom NamespaceHandler implementation (this is an easy step, don’t worry).

  • Coding one or more BeanDefinitionParser implementations (this is where the real work is done).

  • Registering the above artifacts with Spring (this too is an easy step).

What follows is a description of each of these steps. For the example, we will create an XML extension (a custom XML element) that allows us to configure objects of the type SimpleDateFormat (from the java.text package) in an easy manner. When we are done, we will be able to define bean definitions of type SimpleDateFormat like this:

<myns:dateformat id="dateFormat"
	pattern="yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm"
	lenient="true"/>

(Don’t worry about the fact that this example is very simple; much more detailed examples follow afterwards. The intent in this first simple example is to walk you through the basic steps involved.)

Authoring the schema

Creating an XML configuration extension for use with Spring’s IoC container starts with authoring an XML Schema to describe the extension. What follows is the schema we’ll use to configure SimpleDateFormat objects.

<!-- myns.xsd (inside package org/springframework/samples/xml) -->

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsd:schema xmlns="http://www.mycompany.com/schema/myns"
		xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
		xmlns:beans="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
		targetNamespace="http://www.mycompany.com/schema/myns"
		elementFormDefault="qualified"
		attributeFormDefault="unqualified">

	<xsd:import namespace="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"/>

	<xsd:element name="dateformat">
		<xsd:complexType>
			<xsd:complexContent>
				<xsd:extension base="beans:identifiedType">
					<xsd:attribute name="lenient" type="xsd:boolean"/>
					<xsd:attribute name="pattern" type="xsd:string" use="required"/>
				</xsd:extension>
			</xsd:complexContent>
		</xsd:complexType>
	</xsd:element>
</xsd:schema>

(The emphasized line contains an extension base for all tags that will be identifiable (meaning they have an id attribute that will be used as the bean identifier in the container). We are able to use this attribute because we imported the Spring-provided 'beans' namespace.)

The above schema will be used to configure SimpleDateFormat objects, directly in an XML application context file using the <myns:dateformat/> element.

<myns:dateformat id="dateFormat"
	pattern="yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm"
	lenient="true"/>

Note that after we’ve created the infrastructure classes, the above snippet of XML will essentially be exactly the same as the following XML snippet. In other words, we’re just creating a bean in the container, identified by the name 'dateFormat' of type SimpleDateFormat, with a couple of properties set.

<bean id="dateFormat" class="java.text.SimpleDateFormat">
	<constructor-arg value="yyyy-HH-dd HH:mm"/>
	<property name="lenient" value="true"/>
</bean>
Note

The schema-based approach to creating configuration format allows for tight integration with an IDE that has a schema-aware XML editor. Using a properly authored schema, you can use autocompletion to have a user choose between several configuration options defined in the enumeration.

Coding a NamespaceHandler

In addition to the schema, we need a NamespaceHandler that will parse all elements of this specific namespace Spring encounters while parsing configuration files. The NamespaceHandler should in our case take care of the parsing of the myns:dateformat element.

The NamespaceHandler interface is pretty simple in that it features just three methods:

  • init() - allows for initialization of the NamespaceHandler and will be called by Spring before the handler is used

  • BeanDefinition parse(Element, ParserContext) - called when Spring encounters a top-level element (not nested inside a bean definition or a different namespace). This method can register bean definitions itself and/or return a bean definition.

  • BeanDefinitionHolder decorate(Node, BeanDefinitionHolder, ParserContext) - called when Spring encounters an attribute or nested element of a different namespace. The decoration of one or more bean definitions is used for example with the out-of-the-box scopes Spring supports. We’ll start by highlighting a simple example, without using decoration, after which we will show decoration in a somewhat more advanced example.

Although it is perfectly possible to code your own NamespaceHandler for the entire namespace (and hence provide code that parses each and every element in the namespace), it is often the case that each top-level XML element in a Spring XML configuration file results in a single bean definition (as in our case, where a single <myns:dateformat/> element results in a single SimpleDateFormat bean definition). Spring features a number of convenience classes that support this scenario. In this example, we’ll make use the NamespaceHandlerSupport class:

package org.springframework.samples.xml;

import org.springframework.beans.factory.xml.NamespaceHandlerSupport;

public class MyNamespaceHandler extends NamespaceHandlerSupport {

	public void init() {
		registerBeanDefinitionParser("dateformat", new SimpleDateFormatBeanDefinitionParser());
	}

}

The observant reader will notice that there isn’t actually a whole lot of parsing logic in this class. Indeed…​ the NamespaceHandlerSupport class has a built in notion of delegation. It supports the registration of any number of BeanDefinitionParser instances, to which it will delegate to when it needs to parse an element in its namespace. This clean separation of concerns allows a NamespaceHandler to handle the orchestration of the parsing of all of the custom elements in its namespace, while delegating to BeanDefinitionParsers to do the grunt work of the XML parsing; this means that each BeanDefinitionParser will contain just the logic for parsing a single custom element, as we can see in the next step

BeanDefinitionParser

A BeanDefinitionParser will be used if the NamespaceHandler encounters an XML element of the type that has been mapped to the specific bean definition parser (which is 'dateformat' in this case). In other words, the BeanDefinitionParser is responsible for parsing one distinct top-level XML element defined in the schema. In the parser, we’ll have access to the XML element (and thus its subelements too) so that we can parse our custom XML content, as can be seen in the following example:

package org.springframework.samples.xml;

import org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionBuilder;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.xml.AbstractSingleBeanDefinitionParser;
import org.springframework.util.StringUtils;
import org.w3c.dom.Element;

import java.text.SimpleDateFormat;

public class SimpleDateFormatBeanDefinitionParser extends AbstractSingleBeanDefinitionParser { // (1)

	protected Class getBeanClass(Element element) {
		return SimpleDateFormat.class; // (2)
	}

	protected void doParse(Element element, BeanDefinitionBuilder bean) {
		// this will never be null since the schema explicitly requires that a value be supplied
		String pattern = element.getAttribute("pattern");
		bean.addConstructorArg(pattern);

		// this however is an optional property
		String lenient = element.getAttribute("lenient");
		if (StringUtils.hasText(lenient)) {
			bean.addPropertyValue("lenient", Boolean.valueOf(lenient));
		}
	}

}
  1. We use the Spring-provided AbstractSingleBeanDefinitionParser to handle a lot of the basic grunt work of creating a single BeanDefinition.

  2. We supply the AbstractSingleBeanDefinitionParser superclass with the type that our single BeanDefinition will represent.

In this simple case, this is all that we need to do. The creation of our single BeanDefinition is handled by the AbstractSingleBeanDefinitionParser superclass, as is the extraction and setting of the bean definition’s unique identifier.

Registering the handler and the schema

The coding is finished! All that remains to be done is to somehow make the Spring XML parsing infrastructure aware of our custom element; we do this by registering our custom namespaceHandler and custom XSD file in two special purpose properties files. These properties files are both placed in a 'META-INF' directory in your application, and can, for example, be distributed alongside your binary classes in a JAR file. The Spring XML parsing infrastructure will automatically pick up your new extension by consuming these special properties files, the formats of which are detailed below.

'META-INF/spring.handlers'

The properties file called 'spring.handlers' contains a mapping of XML Schema URIs to namespace handler classes. So for our example, we need to write the following:

http\://www.mycompany.com/schema/myns=org.springframework.samples.xml.MyNamespaceHandler

(The ':' character is a valid delimiter in the Java properties format, and so the ':' character in the URI needs to be escaped with a backslash.)

The first part (the key) of the key-value pair is the URI associated with your custom namespace extension, and needs to match exactly the value of the 'targetNamespace' attribute as specified in your custom XSD schema.

'META-INF/spring.schemas'

The properties file called 'spring.schemas' contains a mapping of XML Schema locations (referred to along with the schema declaration in XML files that use the schema as part of the 'xsi:schemaLocation' attribute) to classpath resources. This file is needed to prevent Spring from absolutely having to use a default EntityResolver that requires Internet access to retrieve the schema file. If you specify the mapping in this properties file, Spring will search for the schema on the classpath (in this case 'myns.xsd' in the 'org.springframework.samples.xml' package):

http\://www.mycompany.com/schema/myns/myns.xsd=org/springframework/samples/xml/myns.xsd

The upshot of this is that you are encouraged to deploy your XSD file(s) right alongside the NamespaceHandler and BeanDefinitionParser classes on the classpath.

Using a custom extension in your Spring XML configuration

Using a custom extension that you yourself have implemented is no different from using one of the 'custom' extensions that Spring provides straight out of the box. Find below an example of using the custom <dateformat/> element developed in the previous steps in a Spring XML configuration file.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xmlns:myns="http://www.mycompany.com/schema/myns"
	xsi:schemaLocation="
		http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
		http://www.mycompany.com/schema/myns http://www.mycompany.com/schema/myns/myns.xsd">

	<!-- as a top-level bean -->
	<myns:dateformat id="defaultDateFormat" pattern="yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm" lenient="true"/>

	<bean id="jobDetailTemplate" abstract="true">
		<property name="dateFormat">
			<!-- as an inner bean -->
			<myns:dateformat pattern="HH:mm MM-dd-yyyy"/>
		</property>
	</bean>

</beans>

Meatier examples

Find below some much meatier examples of custom XML extensions.

Nesting custom tags within custom tags

This example illustrates how you might go about writing the various artifacts required to satisfy a target of the following configuration:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
	xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xmlns:foo="http://www.foo.com/schema/component"
	xsi:schemaLocation="
		http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd
		http://www.foo.com/schema/component http://www.foo.com/schema/component/component.xsd">

	<foo:component id="bionic-family" name="Bionic-1">
		<foo:component name="Mother-1">
			<foo:component name="Karate-1"/>
			<foo:component name="Sport-1"/>
		</foo:component>
		<foo:component name="Rock-1"/>
	</foo:component>

</beans>

The above configuration actually nests custom extensions within each other. The class that is actually configured by the above <foo:component/> element is the Component class (shown directly below). Notice how the Component class does not expose a setter method for the 'components' property; this makes it hard (or rather impossible) to configure a bean definition for the Component class using setter injection.

package com.foo;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;

public class Component {

	private String name;
	private List<Component> components = new ArrayList<Component> ();

	// mmm, there is no setter method for the 'components'
	public void addComponent(Component component) {
		this.components.add(component);
	}

	public List<Component> getComponents() {
		return components;
	}

	public String getName() {
		return name;
	}

	public void setName(String name) {
		this.name = name;
	}

}

The typical solution to this issue is to create a custom FactoryBean that exposes a setter property for the 'components' property.

package com.foo;

import org.springframework.beans.factory.FactoryBean;

import java.util.List;

public class ComponentFactoryBean implements FactoryBean<Component> {

	private Component parent;
	private List<Component> children;

	public void setParent(Component parent) {
		this.parent = parent;
	}

	public void setChildren(List<Component> children) {
		this.children = children;
	}

	public Component getObject() throws Exception {
		if (this.children != null && this.children.size() > 0) {
			for (Component child : children) {
				this.parent.addComponent(child);
			}
		}
		return this.parent;
	}

	public Class<Component> getObjectType() {
		return Component.class;
	}

	public boolean isSingleton() {
		return true;
	}

}

This is all very well, and does work nicely, but exposes a lot of Spring plumbing to the end user. What we are going to do is write a custom extension that hides away all of this Spring plumbing. If we stick to the steps described previously, we’ll start off by creating the XSD schema to define the structure of our custom tag.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>

<xsd:schema xmlns="http://www.foo.com/schema/component"
		xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
		targetNamespace="http://www.foo.com/schema/component"
		elementFormDefault="qualified"
		attributeFormDefault="unqualified">

	<xsd:element name="component">
		<xsd:complexType>
			<xsd:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
				<xsd:element ref="component"/>
			</xsd:choice>
			<xsd:attribute name="id" type="xsd:ID"/>
			<xsd:attribute name="name" use="required" type="xsd:string"/>
		</xsd:complexType>
	</xsd:element>

</xsd:schema>

We’ll then create a custom NamespaceHandler.

package com.foo;

import org.springframework.beans.factory.xml.NamespaceHandlerSupport;

public class ComponentNamespaceHandler extends NamespaceHandlerSupport {

	public void init() {
		registerBeanDefinitionParser("component", new ComponentBeanDefinitionParser());
	}

}

Next up is the custom BeanDefinitionParser. Remember that what we are creating is a BeanDefinition describing a ComponentFactoryBean.

package com.foo;

import org.springframework.beans.factory.config.BeanDefinition;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanDefinition;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionBuilder;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.support.ManagedList;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.xml.AbstractBeanDefinitionParser;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.xml.ParserContext;
import org.springframework.util.xml.DomUtils;
import org.w3c.dom.Element;

import java.util.List;

public class ComponentBeanDefinitionParser extends AbstractBeanDefinitionParser {

	protected AbstractBeanDefinition parseInternal(Element element, ParserContext parserContext) {
		return parseComponentElement(element);
	}

	private static AbstractBeanDefinition parseComponentElement(Element element) {
		BeanDefinitionBuilder factory = BeanDefinitionBuilder.rootBeanDefinition(ComponentFactoryBean.class);
		factory.addPropertyValue("parent", parseComponent(element));

		List<Element> childElements = DomUtils.getChildElementsByTagName(element, "component");
		if (childElements != null && childElements.size() > 0) {
			parseChildComponents(childElements, factory);
		}

		return factory.getBeanDefinition();
	}

	private static BeanDefinition parseComponent(Element element) {
		BeanDefinitionBuilder component = BeanDefinitionBuilder.rootBeanDefinition(Component.class);
		component.addPropertyValue("name", element.getAttribute("name"));
		return component.getBeanDefinition();
	}

	private static void parseChildComponents(List<Element> childElements, BeanDefinitionBuilder factory) {
		ManagedList<BeanDefinition> children = new ManagedList<BeanDefinition>(childElements.size());
		for (Element element : childElements) {
			children.add(parseComponentElement(element));
		}
		factory.addPropertyValue("children", children);
	}

}

Lastly, the various artifacts need to be registered with the Spring XML infrastructure.

# in 'META-INF/spring.handlers'
http\://www.foo.com/schema/component=com.foo.ComponentNamespaceHandler
# in 'META-INF/spring.schemas'
http\://www.foo.com/schema/component/component.xsd=com/foo/component.xsd

Custom attributes on 'normal' elements

Writing your own custom parser and the associated artifacts isn’t hard, but sometimes it is not the right thing to do. Consider the scenario where you need to add metadata to already existing bean definitions. In this case you certainly don’t want to have to go off and write your own entire custom extension; rather you just want to add an additional attribute to the existing bean definition element.

By way of another example, let’s say that the service class that you are defining a bean definition for a service object that will (unknown to it) be accessing a clustered JCache, and you want to ensure that the named JCache instance is eagerly started within the surrounding cluster:

<bean id="checkingAccountService" class="com.foo.DefaultCheckingAccountService"
		jcache:cache-name="checking.account">
	<!-- other dependencies here... -->
</bean>

What we are going to do here is create another BeanDefinition when the 'jcache:cache-name' attribute is parsed; this BeanDefinition will then initialize the named JCache for us. We will also modify the existing BeanDefinition for the 'checkingAccountService' so that it will have a dependency on this new JCache-initializing BeanDefinition.

package com.foo;

public class JCacheInitializer {

	private String name;

	public JCacheInitializer(String name) {
		this.name = name;
	}

	public void initialize() {
		// lots of JCache API calls to initialize the named cache...
	}

}

Now onto the custom extension. Firstly, the authoring of the XSD schema describing the custom attribute (quite easy in this case).

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>

<xsd:schema xmlns="http://www.foo.com/schema/jcache"
		xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
		targetNamespace="http://www.foo.com/schema/jcache"
		elementFormDefault="qualified">

	<xsd:attribute name="cache-name" type="xsd:string"/>

</xsd:schema>

Next, the associated NamespaceHandler.

package com.foo;

import org.springframework.beans.factory.xml.NamespaceHandlerSupport;

public class JCacheNamespaceHandler extends NamespaceHandlerSupport {

	public void init() {
		super.registerBeanDefinitionDecoratorForAttribute("cache-name",
			new JCacheInitializingBeanDefinitionDecorator());
	}

}

Next, the parser. Note that in this case, because we are going to be parsing an XML attribute, we write a BeanDefinitionDecorator rather than a BeanDefinitionParser.

package com.foo;

import org.springframework.beans.factory.config.BeanDefinitionHolder;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanDefinition;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.support.BeanDefinitionBuilder;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.xml.BeanDefinitionDecorator;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.xml.ParserContext;
import org.w3c.dom.Attr;
import org.w3c.dom.Node;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;

public class JCacheInitializingBeanDefinitionDecorator implements BeanDefinitionDecorator {

	private static final String[] EMPTY_STRING_ARRAY = new String[0];

	public BeanDefinitionHolder decorate(Node source, BeanDefinitionHolder holder,
			ParserContext ctx) {
		String initializerBeanName = registerJCacheInitializer(source, ctx);
		createDependencyOnJCacheInitializer(holder, initializerBeanName);
		return holder;
	}

	private void createDependencyOnJCacheInitializer(BeanDefinitionHolder holder,
			String initializerBeanName) {
		AbstractBeanDefinition definition = ((AbstractBeanDefinition) holder.getBeanDefinition());
		String[] dependsOn = definition.getDependsOn();
		if (dependsOn == null) {
			dependsOn = new String[]{initializerBeanName};
		} else {
			List dependencies = new ArrayList(Arrays.asList(dependsOn));
			dependencies.add(initializerBeanName);
			dependsOn = (String[]) dependencies.toArray(EMPTY_STRING_ARRAY);
		}
		definition.setDependsOn(dependsOn);
	}

	private String registerJCacheInitializer(Node source, ParserContext ctx) {
		String cacheName = ((Attr) source).getValue();
		String beanName = cacheName + "-initializer";
		if (!ctx.getRegistry().containsBeanDefinition(beanName)) {
			BeanDefinitionBuilder initializer = BeanDefinitionBuilder.rootBeanDefinition(JCacheInitializer.class);
			initializer.addConstructorArg(cacheName);
			ctx.getRegistry().registerBeanDefinition(beanName, initializer.getBeanDefinition());
		}
		return beanName;
	}

}

Lastly, the various artifacts need to be registered with the Spring XML infrastructure.

# in 'META-INF/spring.handlers'
http\://www.foo.com/schema/jcache=com.foo.JCacheNamespaceHandler
# in 'META-INF/spring.schemas'
http\://www.foo.com/schema/jcache/jcache.xsd=com/foo/jcache.xsd