You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In connection with #1289, I wonder whether it might make sense to differentiate in a more standardised way between different works of poetry. The original issue was on the ʿƎṭāna mogar type of qəne, but maybe was not resolved because it is actually a broader question.
The status quo is:
many work records for poetic texts which are textually transmitted (such as malkəʾ, "salām")
the keyword "Poetry" for such records
the values Poem, PoemArke, PoemSalam, and PoemQene for desc @type in additions
Ideas for encoding "genre" could be the introduction of further keywords or the use of narrative units. Do you think that that could be useful?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
In connection with #1289, I wonder whether it might make sense to differentiate in a more standardised way between different works of poetry. The original issue was on the ʿƎṭāna mogar type of qəne, but maybe was not resolved because it is actually a broader question.
The status quo is:
desc @type
in additionsIdeas for encoding "genre" could be the introduction of further keywords or the use of narrative units. Do you think that that could be useful?
@DenisNosnitsin1970 @DariaElagina @smaugustine
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions