Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

abstract in person #2732

Open
thea-m opened this issue Dec 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

abstract in person #2732

thea-m opened this issue Dec 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
person related to person records wishlist Issues for future app improvements, to assign possibly to JinnTech when possible

Comments

@thea-m
Copy link
Contributor

thea-m commented Dec 17, 2024

I see that several recently created person records contain an <abstract> in which basic information on the person is given in paragraphic form. This is currently not visualised, in the past there was a decision against this use abstract in person #1305
Since it seems that the use of abstract in person records is very intuitive and the wish to use it often arises independently, I would propose either to allow this and visualise the content of abstract in person records or modify the schema to produce an error message.

@eu-genia @karljonaskarlsson @CarstenHoffmannMarburg @nafisa-valieva @MagdaKrzyz

@thea-m thea-m added person related to person records wishlist Issues for future app improvements, to assign possibly to JinnTech when possible labels Dec 17, 2024
@nafisa-valieva
Copy link

I have familiarized myself with the issues and find both solutions acceptable: either allowing and visualizing the abstract or having a schema error message.

@karljonaskarlsson
Copy link

To me, both alternatives also sound very reasonable.

@eu-genia
Copy link
Contributor

I have to think a bit and check TEI guidelines, my feeling is that the "instinctive" use goes against them

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
person related to person records wishlist Issues for future app improvements, to assign possibly to JinnTech when possible
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants