Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cod. orient. 271a nv #2715

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Dec 16, 2024
Merged

Cod. orient. 271a nv #2715

merged 12 commits into from
Dec 16, 2024

Conversation

nafisa-valieva
Copy link
Contributor

I have updated the record for the exhibition. I have not added incipit or explicit, since the text is available in LIT id. Let me know if you want me to add the text.

<locus from="64" to="71"/>
</item>
<collation>
<signatures> Quire marks on the upper left corner of the first leaf of each quire
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you want to and have the information available, it is possible to encode the quire numbers also within the individual quires. I think it looks good in the visualization :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It means to change Eliana´s work, but I think it is ok to do so.

</dimensions>
<ab type="ruling" subtype="pattern">1-1-11/0/0/C</ab>
<ab type="pricking" subtype="pattern"> The layout corresponds to the pattern I
defined by D. Nosnitsin: the text is written above the first ruled line, the
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe better to refer to Denis's publication than just to his name?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"pattern I defined" is confusing, because "I" can be read as "me". Better: "The layout corresponds to the pattern 1, defined by D. Nosnitsin."

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But if Denis uses Latin numbers, I think it's better to keep them. However, maybe "Pattern I", with a capitalized "p", would make it clear? It could also be italicized.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see, that a comma in this place is grammatically incorrect. It is better to write this way:
The layout corresponds to pattern I as defined by D. Nosnitsin:

</dimensions>
<ab type="ruling" subtype="pattern">1-1-11/0/0/C</ab>
<ab type="pricking" subtype="pattern"> The layout corresponds to the pattern I
defined by D. Nosnitsin: the text is written above the first ruled line, the
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Again here

<handNote script="Ethiopic" xml:id="h1">
<date notBefore="1700" notAfter="1800"/>
<seg type="ink">18th cent. Black, red</seg>
<note>According to Charles, ´It was written in the 18th cent. Is was possibly
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here it would also be good to refer to the publication

<additions>
<list>
<item xml:id="a1">
<desc>Donation note from J. M. Flad to his beloved brother Haussmann.</desc>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This, I suppose, is PRS4133Flad. Maybe one could add the reference?

Copy link
Contributor

@eu-genia eu-genia Nov 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this is a model description it would be good to do as much mark up as one can. So all owners must be annotated as persName with role="owner".
A record is also needed for Haussmann. On him, see JOHANN LUDWIG KRAPF (ed.), Bericht Ûber die neuesten Vorgänge in Abessinien im Jahr 1863 von C. F. Haussmann, Pilger-Missionar (Basel 1864). https://www.bmarchives.org/items/browse/#c=5100

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is an archival record, as far as I could see, it has not been published yet. I have discussed with Denis what would be a solution and came up with the record you have seen. If you want me to refer to this archival record which needs to be treated as a manuscript, I will do it, but I would be grateful for an example.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bm:KrapfHaussmann1864Bericht
bm:Haussmann1864Bericht

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

great! thank you!

<additions>
<list>
<item xml:id="a1">
<desc>Donation note from J. M. Flad to his beloved brother Haussmann.</desc>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you add types to additions? thank you

<additions>
<list>
<item xml:id="a1">
<desc>Donation note from J. M. Flad to his beloved brother Haussmann.</desc>
Copy link
Contributor

@eu-genia eu-genia Nov 26, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this is a model description it would be good to do as much mark up as one can. So all owners must be annotated as persName with role="owner".
A record is also needed for Haussmann. On him, see JOHANN LUDWIG KRAPF (ed.), Bericht Ûber die neuesten Vorgänge in Abessinien im Jahr 1863 von C. F. Haussmann, Pilger-Missionar (Basel 1864). https://www.bmarchives.org/items/browse/#c=5100

</msContents>
<msItem xml:id="ms_i1">
<locus from="2ra" to="69vb"/>
<title type="complete" ref="LIT1340EnochE">Enoch</title>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

since this is a model description that will be featured in the exhibition it would be good to supply all that we can, so also incipit and explicit in this case, to show off what we can.

<date notBefore="1700" notAfter="1800"/>
<seg type="ink">18th cent. Black, red</seg>
<note>According to Charles, ´It was written in the 18th cent. Is was possibly
written by the same scribe as Ms.o (=Ms.orient.491 [lies: 499] in the British
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the reference to the manuscript must also be marked up

</decoDesc>
<decoDesc>
<decoNote type="punctuation" xml:id="d1">
<locus target="#69vb n3"/>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do not understand this target

<origin>
<origDate notBefore="1700" notAfter="1800" evidence="lettering context"/>
</origin>
<provenance><persName ref="PRS4133Flad"/> bought the manuscript sometime between <date
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

add role="owner"

<provenance><persName ref="PRS4133Flad"/> bought the manuscript sometime between <date
when="1855"/> and <date when="1894"/> during his stays in <placeName
ref="LOC3010Ethiop"/>. <persName ref="PRS4133Flad"/> then gave the manuscript to his
´beloved brother Haussmann´. <persName ref="PRS14592Westenholz"/> bought the
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mark up Haussmann, see above

<source>
<listBibl type="catalogue">
<bibl>
<ptr target="bm:Brockelmann1908KatalogHamburg"/>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

add relevant pages

<listBibl type="secondary">

<bibl>
<ptr target="bm:KnibbUllendorff1978Enoch2"/>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

add relevant pages (speaking of this particular witness)

<ptr target="bm:KnibbUllendorff1978Enoch2"/>
</bibl>
<bibl>
<ptr target="bm:Uhlig1984Henochbuch"/>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pages

in the outer. </ab>
</layout>
<layout columns="2" writtenLines="26 27">
<note>Data on dimension are taken from <locus target="#68r"/>.</note>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dimensions

<dim type="intercolumn">10</dim>
</dimensions>
<ab type="ruling" subtype="pattern">1-1-11/0/0/C</ab>
<ab type="pricking" subtype="pattern"> The layout corresponds to the pattern I
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1 and comma, as above

@karljonaskarlsson
Copy link
Contributor

@nafisa-valieva , you have still not implemented the changes for some of the things you "thumbs-upped", it seems! Just so you don't forget :)

@nafisa-valieva
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nafisa-valieva , you have still not implemented the changes for some of the things you "thumbs-upped", it seems! Just so you don't forget :)

yes yes! I have implemented the changes, but not pushed them yet because there are things I am working on.

@nafisa-valieva
Copy link
Contributor Author

@karljonaskarlsson @eu-genia @CarstenHoffmannMarburg, i believe I have addressed all your comments and would be happy now, in case I have not missed anything, to have you approve.

Copy link
Contributor

@eu-genia eu-genia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you

@@ -189,7 +193,7 @@ type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
<seg type="ink">18th cent. Black, red</seg>
<seg type="rubrication">A few lines, alternating with black lines, on the incipit
page of text 1.1(<locus target="#2r"/>), of part 71 (<locus target="#36v"/>);
navigating element <foreign>ክፍል፡ </foreign> for ´indicating the beginning of a new
navigating element <foreign>ክፍል፡ </foreign> for idicating the beginning of a new
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

indicating

<item xml:id="a2">
<desc type="StampExlibris">Signature written in pencil: "Cod. Orient. 271a = 130
<item xml:id="e1">
<desc>Signature written in pencil: "Cod. Orient. 271a = 130
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why did you delete StampExlibris here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why did you delete StampExlibris here?

I have spoken with Dorothea, these types of additions are rather element, elements do not need ´type´

<item xml:id="a3">
<desc type="Unclear">Note written in pencil: "1905 5388"</desc>
<item xml:id="e2">
<desc>Note written in pencil: "1905 5388"</desc>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

StampExlibris?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same as above.

in the 18th cent. Is was possibly written by the same scribe as Ms.o
(=Ms.orient.491 [lies: 499] in the British Museum).`</note>
in the 18th cent. Is was possibly written by the same scribe as Ms.o (=<ref
type="mss" corresp="BLorient491">.orient.491 [lies: 499] in the British
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[lies: 499] = [read: 499]? Is it a misreading or an alternative shelfmark? Is it a convention to implement it like this? I think, it would be better to solve the unclear notation in the manuscript record of BLorient491.

I think, the readable text in the tag should not start with a dot. I propose:
Is was possibly written by the same scribe as Ms.o (= Ms. orient, referring to <ref type="mss" BLorient491"/>).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to the first comment: I do not know, I am just quoting the quoted comment. I understand your point, but I will think what to do.

@@ -276,6 +279,10 @@ type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?>
also a letter with the details of the purchase. </decoNote>
</binding>
</bindingDesc>
<accMat>Small stripe of <material key="paper">paper</material>: "Handschriften Sammlung
Freihr. a.d. v. <persName ref="PRS14592Westenholz">Westenholz</persName>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think "v." belongs to the name "von Westenholz" and should be integrated in the tag:
<persName ref="PRS14592Westenholz">v. Westenholz</persName>

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

test

@nafisa-valieva nafisa-valieva merged commit 3a356d5 into master Dec 16, 2024
1 check passed
@nafisa-valieva nafisa-valieva deleted the Cod.-orient.-271a_NV branch December 16, 2024 10:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants