Skip to content

Speed up issue triaging with automated chat-bot and chat-ops operations. Increased code review agility by moving quality control hierarchy from requirements to educational steps.

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

BirthdayResearch/oss-governance-bot

Use this GitHub action with your project
Add this Action to an existing workflow or create a new one
View on Marketplace

Repository files navigation

OSS Governance Bot

codecov Codacy Badge Release License MIT

Although putting our project on GitHub makes it transparent and visible for public contributions, it's far from making it maintainable. For new contributors, creating an issue or pull request and successfully sending it is a mountainous journey in itself. Quality control hierarchy such as 'Triage', 'Conventional Commits', 'CI steps' and 'Code review' often deter contributors from contributing due to the complex nature of each OSS governance policy.

A healthy open source projects must be able to scale to thousands of contributors. This project is an attempt to bring efficacy to the process by lowering the barrier of entry for community participation. The onus should be on the reviewers or ChatBot/ChatOp to guide the contributor through a series of education (governance/triage requirements) or adjustment (code review changes).

This project is created to fully utilize the GitHub generous open source policy. It runs on GitHub Actions workflow hooks and deeply integrate with many GitHub offerings. In addition to providing a chat-bot experience when contributor interact with your project, oss-governance-bot also provide automation in the form of policy enforcement. Community contributors can trigger chat-ops via /slash style commands.

What can OSS Governance Bot do for you?

  • Speed up issue triaging with automated chat-bot and chat-ops operations.
  • Increased code review agility by moving quality control hierarchy from requirements to educational steps.
  • Scale to thousands of contributors without alienating community participation with complex quality control hierarchy.
  • A GitHub Action that lives natively and integrate well with the GitHub action/workflow product offering. You can view the source directly and modify it to your needs.
  • See it in action at DeFiCh/jellyfish or DeFiCh/scan.

preview

Usage

.github/workflow/governance.yml

# .github/workflow/governance.yml

on:
  pull_request_target:
    types: [ synchronize, opened, labeled, unlabeled ]
  issues:
    types: [ opened, labeled, unlabeled ]
  issue_comment:
    types: [ created ]

# You can use permissions to modify the default permissions granted to the GITHUB_TOKEN, 
# adding or removing access as required, so that you only allow the minimum required access. 
permissions:
  contents: read
  issues: write
  pull-requests: write
  statuses: write
  checks: write

jobs:
  governance:
    name: Governance
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      # Semantic versioning, lock to different version: v2, v2.0 or a commit hash.
      - uses: BirthdayResearch/oss-governance-bot@v2
        with:
          # You can use a PAT to post a comment/label/status so that it shows up as a user instead of github-actions
          github-token: ${{secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN}} # optional, default to '${{ github.token }}'
          config-path: .github/governance.yml # optional, default to '.github/governance.yml'

.github/governance.yml

# .github/governance.yml

version: v1

issue:
  labels:
    - prefix: triage
      list: [ "accepted" ]
      multiple: false
      author_association:
        collaborator: true
        member: true
        owner: true
      needs:
        comment: |
          @$AUTHOR: This issue is currently awaiting triage.

          The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

    - prefix: kind
      list: [ "feature", "bug", "question" ]
      multiple: false
      needs:
        comment: |
          @$AUTHOR: There are no 'kind' label on this PR. You need a 'kind' label to generate the release note automatically.

          * `/kind feature`
          * `/kind bug`
          * `/kind question`

    - prefix: area
      list: [ "ui-ux", "semantics", "translation", "security" ]
      multiple: true
      needs:
        comment: |
          @$AUTHOR: There are no area labels on this issue. Adding an appropriate label will greatly expedite the process for us. You can add as many area as you see fit. **If you are unsure what to do you can ignore this!**

          * `/area ui-ux`
          * `/area semantics`
          * `/area translation`
          * `/area security`

    - prefix: os
      list: [ "mac", "win", "linux" ]
      multiple: true

    - prefix: priority
      multiple: false
      list: [ "urgent-now", "important-soon" ]
      author_association:
        collaborator: true
        member: true
        owner: true

  chat_ops:
    - cmd: /close
      type: close
      author_association:
        author: true
        collaborator: true
        member: true
        owner: true

    - cmd: /cc
      type: none

    - cmd: /assign
      type: assign
      author_association:
        collaborator: true
        member: true
        owner: true

    - cmd: /comment issue
      type: comment
      comment: |
        @$ISSUE_AUTHOR: Hey this is comment issue example for issue/pr author.
        @$AUTHOR: Hey this is comment issue example for sender author.

pull_request:
  labels:
    - prefix: kind
      multiple: false
      list: [ "feature", "fix", "chore", "docs", "refactor", "dependencies" ]
      needs:
        comment: |
          @$AUTHOR: There are no 'kind' label on this PR. You need a 'kind' label to generate the release automatically.

          * `/kind feature`
          * `/kind fix`
          * `/kind chore`
          * `/kind docs`
          * `/kind refactor`
          * `/kind dependencies`
        status:
          context: "Kind Label"
          description:
            success: Ready for review & merge.
            failure: Missing kind label to generate release automatically.

    - prefix: priority
      multiple: false
      list: [ "urgent-now", "important-soon" ]
      author_association:
        collaborator: true
        member: true
        owner: true

  chat_ops:
    - cmd: /close
      type: close
      author_association:
        author: true
        collaborator: true
        member: true
        owner: true

    - cmd: /cc
      type: none # does not trigger anything

    - cmd: /request
      type: review
      author_association:
        collaborator: true
        member: true
        owner: true

    - cmd: /comment pr
      type: comment
      comment: |
        @$AUTHOR: Hey this is comment pr example.

Configuration

You can target pull_request or issue with labels and/or chat_ops.

version: v1

issue:
  labels:
  chat_ops:

pull_request:
  labels:
  chat_ops:

Author Association

Author association to restrict who can trigger the operation. You can use this for both labels and chat_ops in issue or pull_request.

version: v1

issue:
  labels:
    - prefix: triage
      list: [ "accepted" ]
      author_association:
        author: false
        collaborator: true
        contributor: true
        first_timer: false
        first_time_contributor: false
        mannequin: false
        member: true
        none: false
        owner: true

Labels

version: v1

pull_request:
  labels:
    - prefix: kind
      multiple: false
      list: [ "feature", "fix", "chore", "docs", "refactor", "dependencies" ]
      needs:
        comment: |
          @$AUTHOR: There are no 'kind' label on this PR. You need a 'kind' label to generate the release automatically.

          * `/kind feature`
          * `/kind ...`
        status:
          context: "Governance/Kind"
          description:
            success: Ready for review & merge.
            failure: Missing kind label to generate release automatically.

ChatOps: close

version: v1

issue:
  chat_ops:
    - cmd: /close
      type: close

ChatOps: review

Review is only available for pull_request.

version: v1

pull_request:
  chat_ops:
    # /request-review @john @ben @more
    - cmd: /request-review
      type: review

ChatOps: assign

version: v1

issue:
  chat_ops:
    # /assign @john @ben @more
    - cmd: /assign
      type: assign

ChatOps: none

Does nothing, might be useful to show it in governance.

version: v1

issue:
  chat_ops:
    - cmd: /cc
      type: none

ChatOps: comment

  • $AUTHOR is the user that send the /chat-ops, comment/issue/pull_request.
  • $ISSUE_AUTHOR is the user that owns the current issue/pull_request.
version: v1

issue:
  chat_ops:
    - cmd: /comment me
      type: comment
      comment: |
        @$ISSUE_AUTHOR: Hey this is comment issue example for issue/pr author.
        @$AUTHOR: Hey this is comment issue example for sender author.

ChatOps: label

Add or remove labels via chat ops.

version: v1

issue:
  chat_ops:
    - cmd: /label me
      type: label
      label:
        add: kind/me
        remove: [ 'label/remove', 'label/that' ]

Captures: Regex

Capture labels based on regex, optionally validate them against github_release.

version: v1

issue:
  captures:
    - regex: "- Version: *(.+)"
      github_release: true # validate against github_release
      label: 'version/$CAPTURED'

Development & Contribution

IntelliJ IDEA is the IDE of choice for writing and maintaining this code library. IntelliJ's files are included for convenience with toolchain setup but usage of IntelliJ is optional.

npm i # npm 7 is used
npm run all # to build/check/lint/package
  • For any question please feel free to create an issue.
  • Pull request for non-breaking features are welcomed too!
  • Although all features were created specifically for Birthday Research needs; you should not limit yourself to our offering. Feel free to fork the project. Appreciate if you mention us!

Prior art

About

Speed up issue triaging with automated chat-bot and chat-ops operations. Increased code review agility by moving quality control hierarchy from requirements to educational steps.

Topics

Resources

License

Code of conduct

Security policy

Stars

Watchers

Forks