Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add goodwe backend #75

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rlagerweij
Copy link

These commits make my setup at home work with Sunalyzer. I have an GoodweDNS 4200W solar inverter and a HomeWizard P1 Wifi reader for my smart meter. Since the solar production and grid consumption are registered by two separate devices, I took it upon myself to adapt the grabber for multiple devices. I've tried to split out the various changes that I made into as small as possible chuncks, but I have had to modify the Fronius and Dummy device classes as well.

I think none of the changes should affect existing installations but I obviously can't fully check that since I don't own a Fronius inverter.

@n9yty
Copy link
Contributor

n9yty commented Aug 30, 2024

This is some nice work. It is a bit old and still sitting here? Why not merge this in? In my case where my Fronius unit doesn't have a smart meter, I could perhaps pull data from another source (I have an Emporia monitor system).

@BorisBrock I know this would likely have to be updated now after the other changes, but can this be re-evaluated? It would be nice to be able to bring in my Emporia usage monitoring data, but it would require the support of multiple devices as offered in this patch.

@n9yty
Copy link
Contributor

n9yty commented Sep 3, 2024

I did revise a copy of this locally, but I see it might need some work. It is fixed to only five devices, that should probably be made more dynamic. Also, the new "specific_option", while unused, is defined for the device type not the individual devices. I do have this running here, and am looking at adding an Emporia device, but I can see why this may not be an ideal merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants