Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add suggested polling frequency (aka "shelf life") to decision point pages #523

Open
ahouseholder opened this issue Mar 4, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ahouseholder
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the solution you'd like

(based on a suggestion from @laurie-tyz)

/docs/howto/bootstrap/use.md has a section Information Changes Over Time.

In it are some suggestions for individual decision points and "polling frequency". We should include this information on the individual decision point pages as well, where appropriate.

Describe alternatives you've considered

  • Status quo: keep the content on the use.md page only. Folks who only see the decision point pages in /docs/reference/decision_points might never encounter it.

Additional context

"Shelf life" may or may not be relevant to every decision point, but we should consider whether it is or not in the course of resolving this issue.

This is parallel in concept to the subject of #522, which also suggests replicating information from the bootstrapping docs into individual decision point reference pages.

@ahouseholder ahouseholder added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 4, 2024
@j---
Copy link
Collaborator

j--- commented Mar 4, 2024

This seems like a good idea.
Capturing some notes for future us, before I forget:
Some decision points will be on the order of 1-2 years, for example Mission Impact might be re-validated rather rarely. I suppose CVSS Base score policy is that CVSS vectors are static unless challenged. So I could see an argument that Technical Impact or Value Density are never re-checked. If that is true, it would make sense to document that, also.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants