You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, author. While training the BDA code, I noticed that in evaluation mode, lofF1 is nan, clfF1 is 0.0, and oaF1 is nan. Could you help me identify what might be causing this issue? Additionally, regarding the label construction: for loc_label, 0 represents background and 255 represents building, while for clf_label, 0 represents background, 1 represents no damage, 2 represents minor damage, 3 represents severe damage, and 4 represents destroyed. Are these labels correct?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, author. While training the BDA code, I noticed that in evaluation mode, lofF1 is nan, clfF1 is 0.0, and oaF1 is nan. Could you help me identify what might be causing this issue? Additionally, regarding the label construction: for loc_label, 0 represents background and 255 represents building, while for clf_label, 0 represents background, 1 represents no damage, 2 represents minor damage, 3 represents severe damage, and 4 represents destroyed. Are these labels correct?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: