We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We could implement the axiomatisation of CSSK (cf. Fig. 3), knowing that:
fn(a.P) = fn(P) $\cup$ {a, 'a} fn('a.P) = fn(P) $\cup$ {a, 'a} fn(P + Q) = fn(P) $\cup$ fn(Q) fn(P | Q) = fn(P) $\cup$ fn(Q) fn(0) = $\emptyset$ fn(P \ a) = fn(P) \ {a, 'a} (in the sense "fn(P) minus a, 'a")
and std(X) is X without its keys (its "standard" form)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I guess that the meaning of this issue is "couldn't we use this to solve #22", so it is not really a bug report, more like a question.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
We could implement the axiomatisation of CSSK (cf. Fig. 3), knowing that:
fn(a.P) = fn(P)$\cup$ {a, 'a}$\cup$ {a, 'a}$\cup$ fn(Q)$\cup$ fn(Q)$\emptyset$
fn('a.P) = fn(P)
fn(P + Q) = fn(P)
fn(P | Q) = fn(P)
fn(0) =
fn(P \ a) = fn(P) \ {a, 'a} (in the sense "fn(P) minus a, 'a")
and std(X) is X without its keys (its "standard" form)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: