You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem in the current program to new available techology or software? Please describe and add links/citations if appropriate.
The ClinVar variantS filter is currently a bit clunky with two somewhat hard to understand checkboxes, plus the dropdown. And it still does not allow negation (as in exclude all Benign calls), at least not while retaining inclusion of non-value entries.
Describe the solution you'd like
A refactor, allowing exclusion filter without making the already hard feature worse.
Perhaps the quality level does not have to be a checkbox? While being more careful about the actual contents. It would be lovely to be able to filter on eg the majority of calls, ignoring a single "Conflicting interpretations" or "Uncertain significance" from 2010...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem in the current program to new available techology or software? Please describe and add links/citations if appropriate.
The ClinVar variantS filter is currently a bit clunky with two somewhat hard to understand checkboxes, plus the dropdown. And it still does not allow negation (as in exclude all Benign calls), at least not while retaining inclusion of non-value entries.
Describe the solution you'd like
A refactor, allowing exclusion filter without making the already hard feature worse.
Perhaps the quality level does not have to be a checkbox? While being more careful about the actual contents. It would be lovely to be able to filter on eg the majority of calls, ignoring a single "Conflicting interpretations" or "Uncertain significance" from 2010...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: