Add Review Labels for Security and Effort Estimation

[mrT23]

PR Type:

Enhancement

---

PR Description:

This PR introduces the following enhancements:

• Adds a new feature to set review labels based on the predicted review effort and security concerns.
• Adds new configuration options to enable or disable these review labels.
• Updates the prompts for effort estimation and security concerns to guide the user to provide the expected format of responses.

---

PR Main Files Walkthrough:

files:

• pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py: Added a new method 'set_review_labels' to set review labels based on the review prediction data. The labels are set for review effort and security concerns if enabled in the settings.
• .pr_agent.toml: Added a new configuration option 'enable_review_labels_effort' under 'pr_reviewer' section.
• pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml: Added new configuration options 'enable_review_labels_security' and 'enable_review_labels_effort' under 'pr_reviewer' section.
• pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml: Updated the prompts for 'Estimated effort to review' and 'Security concerns' to guide the user to provide the expected format of responses.

[mrT23]

/describe

[github-actions]

PR Analysis

(review updated until commit 762a698)

• 🎯 Main theme: Adding review labels for security and effort estimation
• 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces a new feature to set review labels based on the predicted review effort and security concerns. It also adds new configuration options to enable or disable these review labels and updates the prompts for effort estimation and security concerns.
• 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
• 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
• ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 3, because the PR involves changes in multiple files and introduces new features which need to be thoroughly reviewed.
• 🔒 Security concerns: No

PR Feedback

• 💡 General suggestions: The new feature of adding review labels based on the predicted review effort and security concerns is a good enhancement. However, it would be better if there were tests added to ensure the new feature works as expected. Also, consider handling the case where the estimated effort is not in the expected format more gracefully.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py
    suggestion: Consider adding a default value for the estimated effort in case it's not provided or not in the expected format. This will prevent the application from crashing due to unexpected input. [important]
    relevant line: estimated_effort = data['PR Analysis']['Estimated effort to review [1-5]']

  • relevant file: pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py
    suggestion: It would be better to handle the exception in a more specific way, for example, by logging the type of the exception along with the error message. This will help in debugging the issue. [medium]
    relevant line: except Exception as e:

  • relevant file: pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml
    suggestion: Consider adding comments to explain what each configuration option does. This will make it easier for other developers to understand the purpose of each option. [medium]
    relevant line: enable_review_labels_security=true

  • relevant file: pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml
    suggestion: Consider adding a note to guide the user to provide the expected format of responses for the 'Security concerns' prompt. This will ensure that the user provides the response in the correct format. [medium]
    relevant line: Answer 'Yes, because ...' if there are security concerns or issues. Explain your answer shortly.

[mrT23]

Persistent review updated to latest commit 7a342d3

[mrT23]

Persistent review updated to latest commit 762a698