Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

protections #1106

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2024
Merged

protections #1106

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2024

Conversation

mrT23
Copy link
Collaborator

@mrT23 mrT23 commented Aug 9, 2024

PR Type

Enhancement


Description

  • Added support for GitHub Flavored Markdown (GFM) in help comments, improving compatibility across different git providers
  • Implemented limits on the number of extra files included in prompts (50) and output (100) for large PRs, preventing token limit issues
  • Improved async task creation for PR description generation, only creating tasks for non-empty patches
  • Enhanced error handling and logging for large PR processing, providing better visibility into potential issues
  • Optimized the extension of additional files in the PR description, ensuring valid YAML output
  • Added clipping and summary for remaining and deleted files when exceeding the limit, improving readability

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
pr_description.py
Enhance PR description generation and large PR handling   

pr_agent/tools/pr_description.py

  • Added condition to check if git provider supports GFM markdown for
    help comment
  • Improved handling of large PRs by limiting the number of extra files
    in prompts and output
  • Enhanced error handling and logging for large PR processing
  • Optimized async task creation for PR description generation
  • +42/-15 

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🏅 Score: 92
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    🔀 Multiple PR themes

    Sub-PR theme: Add support for GitHub Flavored Markdown (GFM) in help comments

    Relevant files:

    • pr_agent/tools/pr_description.py

    Sub-PR theme: Implement limits and optimizations for large PR handling

    Relevant files:

    • pr_agent/tools/pr_description.py

    ⚡ Key issues to review

    Potential Performance Issue
    The new code introduces multiple loops over remaining_files_list and deleted_files_list. For very large PRs, this could potentially impact performance.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Best practice
    Correct indentation for better code readability and consistency

    The indentation of the extra_file_yaml string in the extend_additional_files method
    seems incorrect. Adjust the indentation to match the surrounding code and improve
    readability.

    pr_agent/tools/pr_description.py [294-303]

    -extra_file_yaml = 
    +extra_file_yaml = f"""
     - filename: |
         Additional {len(remaining_files_list) - MAX_EXTRA_FILES_TO_OUTPUT} files not shown
       changes_summary: |
         ...
       changes_title: |
         ...
       label: |
         additional files (token-limit)
    +"""
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: The suggestion accurately points out an indentation issue in the code and provides a correct solution, which significantly improves code readability.

    8
    Error handling
    Improve error handling by returning a default value in case of an exception

    The error handling in the extend_additional_files method could be improved.
    Currently, it logs the error but doesn't return any value in the exception case.
    Consider returning a default value or re-raising the exception.

    pr_agent/tools/pr_description.py [339-340]

     except Exception as e:
         get_logger().error(f"Error extending additional files {self.pr_id}: {e}")
    +    return prediction  # Return the original prediction if an error occurs
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a potential issue in error handling and provides a sensible solution to improve the robustness of the code.

    8
    Maintainability
    Define constants for maximum file limits to improve code maintainability

    Consider using a constant for the maximum number of files to display in the prompt
    and output. This will improve maintainability and make it easier to adjust these
    limits in the future.

    pr_agent/tools/pr_description.py [244-279]

     MAX_EXTRA_FILES_TO_PROMPT = 50
    +MAX_EXTRA_FILES_TO_OUTPUT = 100
     ...
    -MAX_EXTRA_FILES_TO_OUTPUT = 100
    +# Use MAX_EXTRA_FILES_TO_PROMPT and MAX_EXTRA_FILES_TO_OUTPUT consistently
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies the use of magic numbers and proposes using constants, which improves code maintainability and readability.

    7
    Possible issue
    Evaluate the necessity of skipping empty patches in the async processing loop

    The condition if patches: before processing each patch in the async loop might skip
    empty patches. Consider whether this is the intended behavior or if empty patches
    should be processed as well.

    pr_agent/tools/pr_description.py [219-224]

    -if patches:
    -    patches_diff = "\n".join(patches)
    -    get_logger().debug(f"PR diff number {i + 1} for describe files")
    -    task = asyncio.create_task(
    -        self._get_prediction(model, patches_diff, prompt="pr_description_only_files_prompts"))
    -    tasks.append(task)
    +patches_diff = "\n".join(patches)
    +get_logger().debug(f"PR diff number {i + 1} for describe files")
    +task = asyncio.create_task(
    +    self._get_prediction(model, patches_diff, prompt="pr_description_only_files_prompts"))
    +tasks.append(task)
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: The suggestion raises a valid point about potential skipping of empty patches, but it's unclear if this is intentional or not without more context.

    5

    Copy link

    codecov bot commented Aug 9, 2024

    Codecov Report

    Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 28 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

    Project coverage is 17.27%. Comparing base (620dbbe) to head (e531245).
    Report is 17 commits behind head on main.

    Files Patch % Lines
    pr_agent/tools/pr_description.py 0.00% 28 Missing ⚠️
    Additional details and impacted files
    @@            Coverage Diff             @@
    ##             main    #1106      +/-   ##
    ==========================================
    - Coverage   17.31%   17.27%   -0.04%     
    ==========================================
      Files          57       57              
      Lines        7770     7785      +15     
    ==========================================
      Hits         1345     1345              
    - Misses       6425     6440      +15     

    ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
    📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

    @mrT23 mrT23 merged commit 219d962 into main Aug 9, 2024
    2 of 4 checks passed
    @mrT23 mrT23 deleted the tr/protections branch August 9, 2024 18:29
    @ShikangPang
    Copy link

    Configuration file for pr_description_only_files_prompts not submitted in the PR

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    3 participants