Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tr/patch extra lines before and after #1113

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

mrT23
Copy link
Collaborator

@mrT23 mrT23 commented Aug 11, 2024

PR Type

Enhancement, Tests


Description

  • Refactored patch extension functionality to allow separate control of lines before and after changes
  • Updated extend_patch function and related methods to use new patch_extra_lines_before and patch_extra_lines_after parameters
  • Modified configuration to set patch_extra_lines_before to 4 and patch_extra_lines_after to 2
  • Increased max_context_tokens to 16000 for improved context handling
  • Added new 'claude-3-5-sonnet' model to the supported models list
  • Updated tests to reflect new patch extension functionality
  • Enabled extra lines for code suggestions by default
  • Updated documentation to explain new configuration options

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Configuration changes
__init__.py
Add new Claude 3.5 Sonnet model                                                   

pr_agent/algo/init.py

  • Added 'claude-3-5-sonnet' model with a token limit of 100000
+1/-0     
configuration.toml
Update configuration for new patch extension settings       

pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml

  • Changed patch_extra_lines to separate patch_extra_lines_before and
    patch_extra_lines_after
  • Increased max_context_tokens from 10000 to 16000
  • +3/-2     
    Enhancement
    git_patch_processing.py
    Refactor patch extension for flexible line handling           

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py

  • Modified extend_patch function to accept separate parameters for lines
    before and after
  • Updated patch extension logic to use new parameters
  • +8/-19   
    pr_processing.py
    Update PR processing for new patch extension parameters   

    pr_agent/algo/pr_processing.py

  • Updated get_pr_diff and pr_generate_extended_diff to use separate
    before and after line parameters
  • Modified patch extension calls to use new configuration settings
  • +15/-17 
    pr_code_suggestions.py
    Enable extra lines for code suggestions                                   

    pr_agent/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py

  • Changed disable_extra_lines parameter to False in _prepare_prediction
    method
  • +1/-1     
    Tests
    test_extend_patch.py
    Update and add tests for new patch extension functionality

    tests/unittest/test_extend_patch.py

  • Updated existing tests to use new patch_extra_lines_before and
    patch_extra_lines_after parameters
  • Added new test class PRProcessingTest with tests for extended patches
  • +65/-45 
    Documentation
    additional_configurations.md
    Update documentation for new patch extension configuration

    docs/docs/usage-guide/additional_configurations.md

  • Updated configuration example to show separate
    patch_extra_lines_before and patch_extra_lines_after parameters
  • +2/-1     

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    …s handling
    
    - Added unit tests in `test_extend_patch.py` and `test_pr_generate_extended_diff.py` to verify patch extension functionality with extra lines.
    - Updated `pr_processing.py` to include `patch_extra_lines_before` and `patch_extra_lines_after` settings.
    - Modified `configuration.toml` to adjust `patch_extra_lines_before` to 4 and `max_context_tokens` to 16000.
    - Enabled extra lines in `pr_code_suggestions.py`.
    - Added new model `claude-3-5-sonnet` to `__init__.py`.
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪
    🏅 Score: 85
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    🔀 Multiple PR themes

    Sub-PR theme: Refactor patch extension functionality

    Relevant files:

    • pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py
    • pr_agent/algo/pr_processing.py
    • tests/unittest/test_extend_patch.py

    Sub-PR theme: Update configuration and add new Claude model

    Relevant files:

    • pr_agent/algo/init.py
    • pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml

    Sub-PR theme: Update code suggestions and documentation

    Relevant files:

    • pr_agent/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py
    • docs/docs/usage-guide/additional_configurations.md

    ⚡ Key issues to review

    Code Refactoring
    The extend_patch function has been refactored to use separate parameters for lines before and after changes. This change affects the function's interface and usage throughout the codebase.

    Configuration Update
    New configuration options patch_extra_lines_before and patch_extra_lines_after have been introduced to replace the single patch_extra_lines option. This change affects how patch extension is configured and applied throughout the PR processing.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Best practice
    Use parameterized tests to reduce code duplication in test cases

    Consider using parameterized tests to reduce code duplication and improve test
    maintainability for similar test cases.

    tests/unittest/test_extend_patch.py [10-24]

    -def test_happy_path(self):
    -    original_file_str = 'line1\nline2\nline3\nline4\nline5'
    -    patch_str = '@@ -2,2 +2,2 @@ init()\n-line2\n+new_line2\nline3'
    -    num_lines = 1
    -    expected_output = '@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ init()\nline1\n-line2\n+new_line2\nline3\nline4'
    +@pytest.mark.parametrize("original_file_str, patch_str, num_lines, expected_output", [
    +    ('line1\nline2\nline3\nline4\nline5',
    +     '@@ -2,2 +2,2 @@ init()\n-line2\n+new_line2\nline3',
    +     1,
    +     '@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ init()\nline1\n-line2\n+new_line2\nline3\nline4'),
    +    ('line1\nline2\nline3\nline4\nline5',
    +     '',
    +     1,
    +     ''),
    +])
    +def test_extend_patch_cases(self, original_file_str, patch_str, num_lines, expected_output):
         actual_output = extend_patch(original_file_str, patch_str,
                                      patch_extra_lines_before=num_lines, patch_extra_lines_after=num_lines)
         assert actual_output == expected_output
     
    -# Tests that the function returns an empty string when patch_str is empty
    -def test_empty_patch(self):
    -    original_file_str = 'line1\nline2\nline3\nline4\nline5'
    -    patch_str = ''
    -    num_lines = 1
    -    expected_output = ''
    -    assert extend_patch(original_file_str, patch_str,
    -                        patch_extra_lines_before=num_lines, patch_extra_lines_after=num_lines) == expected_output
    -
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: Parameterized tests can significantly reduce code duplication and improve test maintainability, which is a valuable improvement for the test suite.

    8
    Enhancement
    Extract patch extension logic into a separate function for better modularity

    Consider extracting the patch extension logic into a separate function to improve
    code modularity and reusability.

    pr_agent/algo/pr_processing.py [404-407]

    +def get_patch_extension_params():
    +    return {
    +        'patch_extra_lines_before': get_settings().config.patch_extra_lines_before,
    +        'patch_extra_lines_after': get_settings().config.patch_extra_lines_after
    +    }
    +
     patches_extended, total_tokens, patches_extended_tokens = pr_generate_extended_diff(
         pr_languages, token_handler, add_line_numbers_to_hunks=True,
    -    patch_extra_lines_before=get_settings().config.patch_extra_lines_before,
    -    patch_extra_lines_after=get_settings().config.patch_extra_lines_after)
    +    **get_patch_extension_params())
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: This suggestion enhances code modularity and reusability, which can improve maintainability in the long run.

    7
    Maintainability
    Use a more descriptive variable name to improve code readability

    Consider using a more descriptive variable name instead of res to improve code
    readability. For example, you could use hunk_info or patch_details.

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [37-41]

    -res = list(match.groups())
    -for i in range(len(res)):
    -    if res[i] is not None:
    -        res[i] = res[i].decode('utf-8')
    -start1, size1, size2 = map(int, res[:3])
    +hunk_info = list(match.groups())
    +for i in range(len(hunk_info)):
    +    if hunk_info[i] is not None:
    +        hunk_info[i] = hunk_info[i].decode('utf-8')
    +start1, size1, size2 = map(int, hunk_info[:3])
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: The suggestion improves code readability by using a more descriptive variable name, which is a good practice but not critical.

    6
    Add comments to explain the purpose of configuration options

    Consider adding comments to explain the purpose and impact of the
    patch_extra_lines_before and patch_extra_lines_after configuration options.

    pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml [23-24]

    +# Number of extra lines to include before each patch hunk for context
     patch_extra_lines_before = 4
    +# Number of extra lines to include after each patch hunk for context
     patch_extra_lines_after = 2
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: While adding comments is beneficial for code clarity, it's a minor improvement that doesn't affect functionality.

    5

    @mrT23 mrT23 closed this Aug 11, 2024
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant