You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
-if (len(diff_split_lines) >= 6) and \- ((diff_split_lines[2].startswith("---") and- diff_split_lines[3].startswith("+++") and- diff_split_lines[4].startswith("@@")) or- (diff_split_lines[3].startswith("---") and # new or deleted file- diff_split_lines[4].startswith("+++") and- diff_split_lines[5].startswith("@@"))):+def is_valid_diff_header(lines):+ return (len(lines) >= 6) and \+ ((lines[2].startswith("---") and lines[3].startswith("+++") and lines[4].startswith("@@")) or+ (lines[3].startswith("---") and lines[4].startswith("+++") and lines[5].startswith("@@")))+if is_valid_diff_header(diff_split_lines):+
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8
Why: This suggestion significantly improves code readability and maintainability by extracting a complex condition into a separate function.
8
Enhancement
Refactor file content retrieval logic for better maintainability
Consider using a dictionary to map file types to their content retrieval methods, instead of using multiple if-else statements. This can make the code more scalable and easier to maintain.
Why: The suggestion offers a more concise and maintainable approach to file content retrieval, which is a good improvement to the code structure.
7
Combine conditional statements setting boolean flags for more concise code
Consider combining the two conditional statements that set boolean flags to false into a single line using tuple assignment. This can make the code more concise and easier to read.
-if not get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_estimate_effort_to_review:- get_settings().pr_reviewer.enable_review_labels_effort = False # we did not generate this output-if not get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_security_review:- get_settings().pr_reviewer.enable_review_labels_security = False # we did not generate this output+settings = get_settings().pr_reviewer+settings.enable_review_labels_effort, settings.enable_review_labels_security = (+ settings.require_estimate_effort_to_review,+ settings.require_security_review+)
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6
Why: The suggestion provides a more concise way to set the boolean flags, which improves code readability, but it's not a critical change.
6
Best practice
Use a more descriptive variable name in the loop for better readability
Consider using a more descriptive variable name instead of i in the loop. This will improve code readability and maintainability.
-for i, _ in enumerate(diff_split):- diff_split_lines = diff_split[i].splitlines()+for index, _ in enumerate(diff_split):+ diff_split_lines = diff_split[index].splitlines()
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5
Why: The suggestion to use 'index' instead of 'i' is valid and improves readability, but it's a minor improvement.
Refactor repetitive code using a dictionary to map configuration settings to their corresponding enable flags
Consider using a dictionary to map configuration settings to their corresponding enable flags. This approach would make the code more maintainable and easier to extend in the future.
-if not get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_estimate_effort_to_review:- get_settings().pr_reviewer.enable_review_labels_effort = False # we did not generate this output-if not get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_security_review:- get_settings().pr_reviewer.enable_review_labels_security = False # we did not generate this output+config_to_enable_map = {+ 'require_estimate_effort_to_review': 'enable_review_labels_effort',+ 'require_security_review': 'enable_review_labels_security'+}+for require_setting, enable_setting in config_to_enable_map.items():+ if not getattr(get_settings().pr_reviewer, require_setting):+ setattr(get_settings().pr_reviewer, enable_setting, False)
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8
Why: The suggestion improves code maintainability and reduces duplication, making it easier to extend in the future.
8
Best practice
Extract the logic for updating review label settings into a separate method
Consider moving the logic for setting review labels to a separate method to improve code organization and readability.
-if not get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_estimate_effort_to_review:- get_settings().pr_reviewer.enable_review_labels_effort = False # we did not generate this output-if not get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_security_review:- get_settings().pr_reviewer.enable_review_labels_security = False # we did not generate this output+def _update_review_label_settings(self):+ if not get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_estimate_effort_to_review:+ get_settings().pr_reviewer.enable_review_labels_effort = False+ if not get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_security_review:+ get_settings().pr_reviewer.enable_review_labels_security = False+def set_review_labels(self, data):+ if not get_settings().config.publish_output:+ return++ self._update_review_label_settings()+
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7
Why: This suggestion improves code organization and readability by separating concerns, but the benefit is moderate.
7
Use a more descriptive parameter name in the method signature
Consider using a more descriptive variable name instead of data in the set_review_labels method signature to improve code clarity.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Type
Enhancement
Description
set_review_labels
method to ensure review labels are only set when necessaryenable_review_labels_effort
setting ifrequire_estimate_effort_to_review
is not enabledenable_review_labels_security
setting ifrequire_security_review
is not enabledChanges walkthrough 📝
pr_reviewer.py
Conditional Review Label Settings
pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py
are not enabled