protections

[mrT23]

PR Type

Enhancement

---

Description

• Added conditional checks in the set_review_labels method to ensure review labels are only set when necessary
• Disabled the enable_review_labels_effort setting if require_estimate_effort_to_review is not enabled
• Disabled the enable_review_labels_security setting if require_security_review is not enabled
• These changes improve the efficiency and accuracy of the review label setting process

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	pr_reviewer.py Conditional Review Label Settings                                                pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py Added conditional checks for review label settings Disabled security and effort review labels if corresponding settings are not enabled Ensures review labels are only set when necessary +5/-0

---

💡 PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🏅 Score: 95

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

🔀 No multiple PR themes

⚡ No key issues to review

[mrT23]

/improve

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Latest suggestions up to 8589941

Category	Suggestion	Score
Maintainability	Extract complex condition into a separate function for improved readability Consider extracting the complex condition into a separate function for better readability and maintainability. pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [160-166] -if (len(diff_split_lines) >= 6) and \ - ((diff_split_lines[2].startswith("---") and - diff_split_lines[3].startswith("+++") and - diff_split_lines[4].startswith("@@")) or - (diff_split_lines[3].startswith("---") and # new or deleted file - diff_split_lines[4].startswith("+++") and - diff_split_lines[5].startswith("@@"))): +def is_valid_diff_header(lines): + return (len(lines) >= 6) and \ + ((lines[2].startswith("---") and lines[3].startswith("+++") and lines[4].startswith("@@")) or + (lines[3].startswith("---") and lines[4].startswith("+++") and lines[5].startswith("@@"))) +if is_valid_diff_header(diff_split_lines): + Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: This suggestion significantly improves code readability and maintainability by extracting a complex condition into a separate function.	8
Enhancement	Refactor file content retrieval logic for better maintainability Consider using a dictionary to map file types to their content retrieval methods, instead of using multiple if-else statements. This can make the code more scalable and easier to maintain. pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [180-187] -if diff.old.get_data("links"): - original_file_content_str = self._get_pr_file_content(diff.old.get_data("links")['self']['href']) -else: - original_file_content_str = "" -if diff.new.get_data("links"): - new_file_content_str = self._get_pr_file_content(diff.new.get_data("links")['self']['href']) -else: - new_file_content_str = "" +def get_content(diff_file): + return self._get_pr_file_content(diff_file.get_data("links")['self']['href']) if diff_file.get_data("links") else "" +original_file_content_str = get_content(diff.old) +new_file_content_str = get_content(diff.new) + Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion offers a more concise and maintainable approach to file content retrieval, which is a good improvement to the code structure.	7
	Combine conditional statements setting boolean flags for more concise code Consider combining the two conditional statements that set boolean flags to false into a single line using tuple assignment. This can make the code more concise and easier to read. pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py [381-384] -if not get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_estimate_effort_to_review: - get_settings().pr_reviewer.enable_review_labels_effort = False # we did not generate this output -if not get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_security_review: - get_settings().pr_reviewer.enable_review_labels_security = False # we did not generate this output +settings = get_settings().pr_reviewer +settings.enable_review_labels_effort, settings.enable_review_labels_security = ( + settings.require_estimate_effort_to_review, + settings.require_security_review +) Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: The suggestion provides a more concise way to set the boolean flags, which improves code readability, but it's not a critical change.	6
Best practice	Use a more descriptive variable name in the loop for better readability Consider using a more descriptive variable name instead of i in the loop. This will improve code readability and maintainability. pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py [158-159] -for i, _ in enumerate(diff_split): - diff_split_lines = diff_split[i].splitlines() +for index, _ in enumerate(diff_split): + diff_split_lines = diff_split[index].splitlines() Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: The suggestion to use 'index' instead of 'i' is valid and improves readability, but it's a minor improvement.	5

---

Previous suggestions

Suggestions up to commit 8589941

Category	Suggestion	Score
Maintainability	Refactor repetitive code using a dictionary to map configuration settings to their corresponding enable flags Consider using a dictionary to map configuration settings to their corresponding enable flags. This approach would make the code more maintainable and easier to extend in the future. pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py [381-384] -if not get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_estimate_effort_to_review: - get_settings().pr_reviewer.enable_review_labels_effort = False # we did not generate this output -if not get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_security_review: - get_settings().pr_reviewer.enable_review_labels_security = False # we did not generate this output +config_to_enable_map = { + 'require_estimate_effort_to_review': 'enable_review_labels_effort', + 'require_security_review': 'enable_review_labels_security' +} +for require_setting, enable_setting in config_to_enable_map.items(): + if not getattr(get_settings().pr_reviewer, require_setting): + setattr(get_settings().pr_reviewer, enable_setting, False) Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion improves code maintainability and reduces duplication, making it easier to extend in the future.	8
Best practice	Extract the logic for updating review label settings into a separate method Consider moving the logic for setting review labels to a separate method to improve code organization and readability. pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py [381-384] -if not get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_estimate_effort_to_review: - get_settings().pr_reviewer.enable_review_labels_effort = False # we did not generate this output -if not get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_security_review: - get_settings().pr_reviewer.enable_review_labels_security = False # we did not generate this output +def _update_review_label_settings(self): + if not get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_estimate_effort_to_review: + get_settings().pr_reviewer.enable_review_labels_effort = False + if not get_settings().pr_reviewer.require_security_review: + get_settings().pr_reviewer.enable_review_labels_security = False +def set_review_labels(self, data): + if not get_settings().config.publish_output: + return + + self._update_review_label_settings() + Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: This suggestion improves code organization and readability by separating concerns, but the benefit is moderate.	7
	Use a more descriptive parameter name in the method signature Consider using a more descriptive variable name instead of data in the set_review_labels method signature to improve code clarity. pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py [377] -def set_review_labels(self, data): +def set_review_labels(self, review_data): Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: While using a more descriptive parameter name improves code clarity, the impact is relatively minor in this context.	5