Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add error handling for missing GitLab URL and improve inline comment … #1132

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 13, 2024

Conversation

mrT23
Copy link
Collaborator

@mrT23 mrT23 commented Aug 13, 2024

User description

…logic in gitlab_provider.py


PR Type

Enhancement, Bug fix


Description

  • Added error handling for missing GitLab URL in the config file
  • Improved inline comment logic with better error handling and fallback options
  • Enhanced code suggestion handling to accommodate different data structures
  • Added a new method get_pr_owner_id() to retrieve the PR owner's ID
  • Fixed potential issues with type mismatches and missing keys in dictionaries
  • Improved logging messages for better debugging
  • Refactored some parts of the code for better readability and maintainability

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
gitlab_provider.py
Enhance GitLab provider with improved error handling and comment logic

pr_agent/git_providers/gitlab_provider.py

  • Added error handling for missing GitLab URL
  • Improved inline comment logic and error handling
  • Enhanced code suggestion handling with more robust fallback options
  • Added method to get PR owner ID
  • +38/-12 

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    @codiumai-pr-agent-pro codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot added enhancement New feature or request Bug fix labels Aug 13, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪
    🏅 Score: 85
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    🔀 No multiple PR themes
    ⚡ Key issues to review

    Error Handling
    The new error handling for missing GitLab URL is good, but it might be better to use a custom exception instead of a generic ValueError.

    Code Duplication
    There's some code duplication in the fallback logic for creating a general note. Consider refactoring this into a separate method.

    Type Annotation
    The return type annotation for get_pr_owner_id() method uses the | operator which is not valid in Python type hints. Consider using Union[str, None] or Optional[str] instead.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Use GitLab API to fetch project owner information more reliably

    In the get_pr_owner_id method, consider using a more robust way to extract the
    project owner from the id_project. The current implementation assumes a specific
    format (owner/project) which might not always be the case. Consider using GitLab API
    to fetch the project details and extract the owner information.

    pr_agent/git_providers/gitlab_provider.py [443-450]

     def get_pr_owner_id(self) -> str | None:
         if not self.gitlab_url or 'gitlab.com' in self.gitlab_url:
             if not self.id_project:
                 return None
    -        return self.id_project.split('/')[0]
    +        try:
    +            project = self.gl.projects.get(self.id_project)
    +            return project.namespace['full_path']
    +        except gitlab.exceptions.GitlabGetError:
    +            return None
         # extract host name
         host = urlparse(self.gitlab_url).hostname
         return host
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: This suggestion addresses a potential issue in the code and proposes a more robust solution using the GitLab API, which significantly improves the reliability of the function.

    9
    Maintainability
    Extract fallback comment logic into a separate method

    Consider extracting the logic for creating the fallback comment into a separate
    method to improve code readability and maintainability. This will also make it
    easier to test and modify the fallback behavior in the future.

    pr_agent/git_providers/gitlab_provider.py [259-280]

    -if 'suggestion_orig_location' in original_suggestion:
    -    line_start = original_suggestion['suggestion_orig_location']['start_line']
    -    line_end = original_suggestion['suggestion_orig_location']['end_line']
    -    old_code_snippet = original_suggestion['prev_code_snippet']
    -    new_code_snippet = original_suggestion['new_code_snippet']
    -    content = original_suggestion['suggestion_summary']
    -    label = original_suggestion['category']
    -    if 'score' in original_suggestion:
    -        score = original_suggestion['score']
    +def _extract_fallback_comment_data(self, original_suggestion):
    +    if 'suggestion_orig_location' in original_suggestion:
    +        line_start = original_suggestion['suggestion_orig_location']['start_line']
    +        line_end = original_suggestion['suggestion_orig_location']['end_line']
    +        old_code_snippet = original_suggestion['prev_code_snippet']
    +        new_code_snippet = original_suggestion['new_code_snippet']
    +        content = original_suggestion['suggestion_summary']
    +        label = original_suggestion['category']
         else:
    -        score = 7
    -else:
    -    line_start = original_suggestion['relevant_lines_start']
    -    line_end = original_suggestion['relevant_lines_end']
    -    old_code_snippet = original_suggestion['existing_code']
    -    new_code_snippet = original_suggestion['improved_code']
    -    content = original_suggestion['suggestion_content']
    -    label = original_suggestion['label']
    -    if 'score' in original_suggestion:
    -        score = original_suggestion['score']
    -    else:
    -        score = 7
    +        line_start = original_suggestion['relevant_lines_start']
    +        line_end = original_suggestion['relevant_lines_end']
    +        old_code_snippet = original_suggestion['existing_code']
    +        new_code_snippet = original_suggestion['improved_code']
    +        content = original_suggestion['suggestion_content']
    +        label = original_suggestion['label']
    +    
    +    score = original_suggestion.get('score', 7)
    +    return line_start, line_end, old_code_snippet, new_code_snippet, content, label, score
     
    +# In the send_inline_comment method:
    +line_start, line_end, old_code_snippet, new_code_snippet, content, label, score = self._extract_fallback_comment_data(original_suggestion)
    +
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This suggestion significantly improves code readability and maintainability by extracting complex logic into a separate method, which is a valuable refactoring.

    8
    Error handling
    Use a more specific exception type when catching errors

    Consider using a more specific exception type instead of the generic Exception when
    catching errors in the send_inline_comment method. This will make it easier to
    handle different types of errors separately if needed in the future.

    pr_agent/git_providers/gitlab_provider.py [254-258]

     try:
         self.mr.discussions.create({'body': body, 'position': pos_obj})
    -except Exception as e:
    +except gitlab.exceptions.GitlabCreateError as e:
         try:
             # fallback - create a general note on the file in the MR
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion to use a more specific exception type (gitlab.exceptions.GitlabCreateError) is valid and improves error handling, but it's not a critical change.

    7
    Best practice
    Use dictionary's get method with a default value for cleaner code

    Consider using the get method with a default value for the score key in the
    original_suggestion dictionary, instead of using an if-else statement. This will
    make the code more concise and easier to read.

    pr_agent/git_providers/gitlab_provider.py [267-270]

    -if 'score' in original_suggestion:
    -    score = original_suggestion['score']
    -else:
    -    score = 7
    +score = original_suggestion.get('score', 7)
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: The suggestion to use the dictionary's get method is a good practice for more concise code, but it's a minor improvement in terms of functionality.

    6

    @mrT23 mrT23 merged commit 7ac9f27 into main Aug 13, 2024
    2 checks passed
    @mrT23 mrT23 deleted the tr/err_protections branch August 13, 2024 16:05
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    3 participants