Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DRAFT: Gitlab serve whitelist ips #1167

Closed

Conversation

paolomainardi
Copy link
Contributor

@paolomainardi paolomainardi commented Aug 22, 2024

User description

refs #1166


PR Type

Enhancement


Description

  • Implemented IP whitelisting functionality for the GitLab webhook server
  • Added IPWhitelistMiddleware to check client IP against a whitelist
  • Created a custom exception handler for HTTPException to return JSON responses
  • Modified FastAPI app initialization to include the new middleware
  • Added server_whitelisted_ips configuration option in configuration.toml
  • Improved error handling and security for the webhook server

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
gitlab_webhook.py
Implement IP whitelisting for GitLab webhook server           

pr_agent/servers/gitlab_webhook.py

  • Imported HTTPException and BaseHTTPMiddleware
  • Implemented IPWhitelistMiddleware to restrict access based on client
    IP
  • Added custom exception handler for HTTPException
  • Modified FastAPI app initialization to include new middleware
  • +28/-4   
    Configuration changes
    configuration.toml
    Add whitelist IP configuration                                                     

    pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml

    • Added server_whitelisted_ips configuration option
    +2/-0     

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    @paolomainardi paolomainardi changed the title DRAFT: Gitlab serve whitelist ips DRAFT: Gitlab server whitelist ips Aug 22, 2024
    @codiumai-pr-agent-pro codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 22, 2024
    @codiumai-pr-agent-pro codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot changed the title DRAFT: Gitlab server whitelist ips DRAFT: Gitlab serve whitelist ips Aug 22, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🏅 Score: 85
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 Security concerns

    IP Whitelist Implementation:
    The current implementation of IP whitelisting in the IPWhitelistMiddleware class may have potential security issues. The code only handles IPv4 addresses with ports, but it doesn't account for IPv6 addresses or other possible formats. This could potentially allow unauthorized access if an attacker uses a different IP format. Additionally, the whitelist check is only performed if the whitelisted_ips list is not empty, which might not be the intended behavior if the list is accidentally left empty.

    🔀 Multiple PR themes

    Sub-PR theme: Implement IP whitelisting for GitLab webhook server

    Relevant files:

    • pr_agent/servers/gitlab_webhook.py

    Sub-PR theme: Update configuration settings and add server_whitelisted_ips option

    Relevant files:

    • pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml

    ⚡ Key issues to review

    Security Concern
    The IP whitelisting implementation might not handle all possible IP formats, potentially allowing unauthorized access.

    Error Handling
    The custom exception handler for HTTPException might not cover all possible error scenarios.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Performance
    Optimize IP whitelist checking for better performance

    The IP whitelist check is performed on every request, which could impact performance
    for high-traffic applications. Consider caching the whitelist or using a more
    efficient data structure for lookups if the list of whitelisted IPs is large.

    pr_agent/servers/gitlab_webhook.py [201-214]

     class IPWhitelistMiddleware(BaseHTTPMiddleware):
    +    def __init__(self, app):
    +        super().__init__(app)
    +        self.whitelisted_ips = set(get_settings().get("CONFIG.WHITELISTED_IPS", []))
    +
         async def dispatch(self, request: Request, call_next):
    -        whitelisted_ips = get_settings().get("CONFIG.WHITELISTED_IPS", [])
    -        client_ip = request.client.host
    +        client_ip = request.client.host.split(":")[0]  # Strip port if present
    +        if self.whitelisted_ips and client_ip not in self.whitelisted_ips:
    +            logging.warning(f"Client IP {client_ip} not in whitelisted IPs")
    +            raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Forbidden")
    +        return await call_next(request)
     
    -        # strip port from client_ip if present.
    -        if ":" in client_ip:
    -            client_ip = client_ip.split(":")[0]
    -
    -        if client_ip not in whitelisted_ips and whitelisted_ips != []:
    -            print (f"Client IP {client_ip} not in whitelisted IPs {whitelisted_ips}")
    -            raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Forbidden")
    -        response = await call_next(request)
    -        return response
    -
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: This suggestion significantly improves performance and efficiency, especially for high-traffic applications.

    9
    Possible issue
    Improve IP address handling to support both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses correctly

    The current implementation doesn't handle IPv6 addresses properly. The string
    splitting method used to remove the port might not work correctly for IPv6
    addresses. Consider using the ipaddress module for more robust IP address handling.

    pr_agent/servers/gitlab_webhook.py [204-208]

    -client_ip = request.client.host
    +from ipaddress import ip_address
     
    -# strip port from client_ip if present.
    -if ":" in client_ip:
    -    client_ip = client_ip.split(":")[0]
    +try:
    +    client_ip = ip_address(request.client.host.split('%')[0])  # Remove scope if present
    +except ValueError:
    +    logging.error(f"Invalid IP address: {request.client.host}")
    +    raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail="Invalid IP address")
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: Proper handling of both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses is crucial for network compatibility and security.

    9
    Best practice
    Replace print statement with proper logging for IP whitelist violations

    The print statement used for logging the IP whitelist violation is not suitable for
    production environments. Consider using a proper logging mechanism that allows for
    better control over log levels and output destinations.

    pr_agent/servers/gitlab_webhook.py [210-212]

     if client_ip not in whitelisted_ips and whitelisted_ips != []:
    -    print (f"Client IP {client_ip} not in whitelisted IPs {whitelisted_ips}")
    +    logging.warning(f"Client IP {client_ip} not in whitelisted IPs {whitelisted_ips}")
         raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Forbidden")
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: Proper logging is a significant improvement for production environments, enhancing debugging and monitoring capabilities.

    8
    Enhancement
    Use a custom exception for IP whitelist violations instead of a general HTTPException

    Consider using a more specific exception type instead of a general HTTPException for
    IP whitelist violations. This would provide clearer error handling and make it
    easier to distinguish between different types of errors.

    pr_agent/servers/gitlab_webhook.py [210-212]

     if client_ip not in whitelisted_ips and whitelisted_ips != []:
    -    print (f"Client IP {client_ip} not in whitelisted IPs {whitelisted_ips}")
    -    raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Forbidden")
    +    print(f"Client IP {client_ip} not in whitelisted IPs {whitelisted_ips}")
    +    raise IPWhitelistViolation(status_code=403, detail="IP not in whitelist")
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Using a custom exception improves error handling specificity and clarity, but it's not a critical change.

    7

    @paolomainardi
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    /describe

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

    PR Description updated to latest commit (91bc229)

    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator

    mrT23 commented Aug 25, 2024

    closing, as this is ability should not be a part of pr-agent

    @mrT23 mrT23 closed this Aug 25, 2024
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants