feat: keep manual comments working when commenting draft MRs

[paolomainardi]

User description

closes #1160

---

PR Type

Enhancement

---

Description

• Removed the check for draft status in the GitLab webhook handler
• Allows manual comments to be processed for both draft and non-draft merge requests
• Improves user experience by enabling interaction with draft merge requests
• Addresses issue Gitlab server should handle the draft status  #1160

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	gitlab_webhook.py Enable manual comments on draft merge requests                      pr_agent/servers/gitlab_webhook.py Removed code that skipped processing draft merge requests Enabled manual comments to work on draft merge requests +1/-5

---

💡 PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🏅 Score: 95

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

🔀 No multiple PR themes

⚡ No key issues to review

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Improve error handling when accessing nested dictionary keys Consider handling potential KeyError exceptions when accessing nested dictionary keys using the get() method with a default value. pr_agent/servers/gitlab_webhook.py [143-145] -body = data.get('object_attributes', {}).get('note') -if data.get('object_attributes', {}).get('type') == 'DiffNote' and '/ask' in body: # /ask_line +body = data.get('object_attributes', {}).get('note', '') +if data.get('object_attributes', {}).get('type') == 'DiffNote' and body and '/ask' in body: # /ask_line body = handle_ask_line(body, data) Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion improves robustness by handling potential KeyError exceptions, which is a good practice for working with nested dictionaries.	7

[paolomainardi]

Thanks @mrT23