Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

checking for publish_output in the suggestions tool exception handler #1184

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2024

Conversation

MaxHoecker
Copy link

@MaxHoecker MaxHoecker commented Aug 28, 2024

PR Type

Bug fix


Description

  • Added a check for publish_output configuration in the exception handler of the code suggestions tool
  • Error handling and comment publishing are now only executed when publish_output is set to True
  • This change ensures that error messages are not published when output publishing is disabled
  • Improves consistency with the tool's behavior when successful

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Error handling
pr_code_suggestions.py
Improve error handling in code suggestions tool                   

pr_agent/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py

  • Added a check for publish_output in the exception handler
  • Wrapped the error handling and comment publishing logic inside the
    publish_output condition
  • +9/-8     

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🏅 Score: 95
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    🔀 No multiple PR themes
    ⚡ No key issues to review

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Error handling
    Move error handling logic outside the conditional block for consistent execution

    Consider moving the error handling logic outside the if block to ensure it's always
    executed, regardless of the publish_output setting. This will maintain consistent
    error handling behavior.

    pr_agent/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py [171-179]

    -if get_settings().config.publish_output:
    -    if self.progress_response:
    -        self.progress_response.delete()
    -    else:
    -        try:
    -            self.git_provider.remove_initial_comment()
    +if self.progress_response:
    +    self.progress_response.delete()
    +else:
    +    try:
    +        self.git_provider.remove_initial_comment()
    +        if get_settings().config.publish_output:
                 self.git_provider.publish_comment(f"Failed to generate code suggestions for PR")
    -        except Exception as e:
    -            pass
    +    except Exception as e:
    +        pass
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies an improvement in error handling consistency, which is important for maintaining robust code behavior across different settings.

    8
    Log exceptions caught in nested try-except blocks for better debugging

    Consider logging the exception when catching it in the nested try-except block. This
    will help with debugging and understanding any issues that occur during the error
    handling process.

    pr_agent/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py [175-179]

     try:
         self.git_provider.remove_initial_comment()
         self.git_provider.publish_comment(f"Failed to generate code suggestions for PR")
     except Exception as e:
    -    pass
    +    get_logger().error(f"Error during error handling: {e}")
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: This suggestion enhances error visibility and debugging capabilities, which is valuable for maintaining and troubleshooting the code, especially in error handling scenarios.

    7

    @mrT23 mrT23 closed this Aug 28, 2024
    @mrT23 mrT23 reopened this Aug 28, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🏅 Score: 95
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    🔀 No multiple PR themes
    ⚡ No key issues to review

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Best practice
    Log exceptions in error handling for better debugging

    Consider logging the exception when failing to remove the initial comment or publish
    the error comment. This can help with debugging issues in the error handling
    process.

    pr_agent/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py [175-179]

     try:
         self.git_provider.remove_initial_comment()
    -    self.git_provider.publish_comment(f"Failed to generate code suggestions for PR")
    +    self.git_provider.publish_comment("Failed to generate code suggestions for PR")
     except Exception as e:
    -    pass
    +    get_logger().warning(f"Failed to remove initial comment or publish error: {e}")
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This suggestion enhances error handling and debugging capabilities, which is important for maintaining and troubleshooting the code.

    8
    Enhancement
    Use a context manager to handle error reporting and cleanup

    Consider using a context manager to handle the deletion of self.progress_response
    and the publishing of the error comment. This can help reduce code duplication and
    improve readability.

    pr_agent/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py [171-179]

     if get_settings().config.publish_output:
    -    if self.progress_response:
    -        self.progress_response.delete()
    -    else:
    -        try:
    +    with contextlib.suppress(Exception):
    +        if self.progress_response:
    +            self.progress_response.delete()
    +        else:
                 self.git_provider.remove_initial_comment()
    -            self.git_provider.publish_comment(f"Failed to generate code suggestions for PR")
    -        except Exception as e:
    -            pass
    +            self.git_provider.publish_comment("Failed to generate code suggestions for PR")
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: The suggestion improves code readability and reduces duplication, but it's not addressing a critical issue or bug.

    7
    Remove unnecessary f-string from error message

    Remove the f-string from the error message as it doesn't contain any formatted
    values. This simplifies the code without changing its functionality.

    pr_agent/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py [177]

    -self.git_provider.publish_comment(f"Failed to generate code suggestions for PR")
    +self.git_provider.publish_comment("Failed to generate code suggestions for PR")
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3

    Why: While correct, this suggestion offers only a minor improvement in code cleanliness and has no impact on functionality.

    3

    self.git_provider.publish_comment(f"Failed to generate code suggestions for PR")
    except Exception as e:
    pass
    if get_settings().config.publish_output:
    Copy link
    Collaborator

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    move this to line 176

    Copy link
    Author

    @MaxHoecker MaxHoecker Aug 28, 2024

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    shouldn't the progress_response (as well as the initial_comment) not exist if publish_output is false? Therefore it makes sense to wrap all of the output publishing logic here in the publish_output check?

    Copy link
    Collaborator

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    i dont know. ok

    @qin987
    Copy link

    qin987 commented Aug 28, 2024

    Preparing review...

    13 similar comments
    @qin987
    Copy link

    qin987 commented Aug 28, 2024

    Preparing review...

    @qin987
    Copy link

    qin987 commented Aug 28, 2024

    Preparing review...

    @qin987
    Copy link

    qin987 commented Aug 28, 2024

    Preparing review...

    @qin987
    Copy link

    qin987 commented Aug 28, 2024

    Preparing review...

    @qin987
    Copy link

    qin987 commented Aug 28, 2024

    Preparing review...

    @qin987
    Copy link

    qin987 commented Aug 28, 2024

    Preparing review...

    @qin987
    Copy link

    qin987 commented Aug 28, 2024

    Preparing review...

    @qin987
    Copy link

    qin987 commented Aug 28, 2024

    Preparing review...

    @qin987
    Copy link

    qin987 commented Aug 28, 2024

    Preparing review...

    @qin987
    Copy link

    qin987 commented Aug 28, 2024

    Preparing review...

    @qin987
    Copy link

    qin987 commented Aug 28, 2024

    Preparing review...

    @qin987
    Copy link

    qin987 commented Aug 28, 2024

    Preparing review...

    @qin987
    Copy link

    qin987 commented Aug 28, 2024

    Preparing review...

    @mrT23 mrT23 merged commit 97b48da into Codium-ai:main Aug 28, 2024
    2 checks passed
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    3 participants