Tr/help

[mrT23]

PR Type

enhancement, dependencies

---

Description

• Refactored the PR help message tool to utilize the full documentation content for answering questions, replacing the previous method of retrieving similarity results from various databases.
• Updated the logic to read and prioritize markdown files from the documentation, ensuring that priority files are processed first.
• Modified the response handling to focus on relevant sections of the documentation instead of snippets, improving the accuracy of the answers.
• Updated the system prompts to reflect the changes in how documentation content is used, and adjusted the output format to include relevant sections.
• Removed unused dependencies related to langchain and chromadb from the requirements.txt file.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	pr_help_message.py Refactor PR help tool to use full documentation content    pr_agent/tools/pr_help_message.py Removed methods for retrieving similarity results from various databases. Added logic to read and prioritize markdown files from documentation. Updated the method to prepare and clip documentation content for AI processing. Modified the response handling to use relevant sections instead of snippets. +43/-114 pr_help_prompts.toml Update prompts to align with full documentation usage        pr_agent/settings/pr_help_prompts.toml Updated system instructions to use full documentation content. Changed output format to use relevant sections instead of snippets. Added new class definition for relevant sections. +14/-10
Dependencies	requirements.txt Clean up unused dependencies from requirements                      requirements.txt Removed dependencies related to langchain and chromadb. +0/-6

---

💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

(Checks updated until commit 9786499)

Action: build-and-test

Failed stage: Build dev docker [❌]

Failure summary: The action failed due to an error in the Docker build process: The ADD command in the Dockerfile attempted to add a file docs/chroma_db.zip to the image. The file docs/chroma_db.zip could not be found, resulting in a failure to calculate the checksum. This caused the build process to fail with an error message indicating the file was not found.

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 747: #7 importing cache manifest from gha:12788529805924562417 748: #7 DONE 0.3s 749: #5 [internal] load build context 750: #5 transferring context: 810.67kB 0.0s done 751: #5 DONE 0.0s 752: #8 [base 2/6] WORKDIR /app 753: #8 CACHED 754: #9 [base 3/6] ADD docs/chroma_db.zip /app/docs/chroma_db.zip 755: #9 ERROR: failed to calculate checksum of ref jx9dxesitgggms7h8dkz2q1nn::r9worxhebwh490hnpfzmprmk7: "/docs/chroma_db.zip": not found ... 759: Dockerfile:4 760: -------------------- 761: 2 | 762: 3 | WORKDIR /app 763: 4 | >>> ADD docs/chroma_db.zip /app/docs/chroma_db.zip 764: 5 | ADD pyproject.toml . 765: 6 | ADD requirements.txt . 766: -------------------- 767: ERROR: failed to solve: failed to compute cache key: failed to calculate checksum of ref jx9dxesitgggms7h8dkz2q1nn::r9worxhebwh490hnpfzmprmk7: "/docs/chroma_db.zip": not found 768: ##[error]buildx failed with: ERROR: failed to solve: failed to compute cache key: failed to calculate checksum of ref jx9dxesitgggms7h8dkz2q1nn::r9worxhebwh490hnpfzmprmk7: "/docs/chroma_db.zip": not found

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🏅 Score: 85

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

🔀 Multiple PR themes Sub-PR theme: Refactor PR help message tool to use full documentation content Relevant files: pr_agent/tools/pr_help_message.py pr_agent/settings/pr_help_prompts.toml Sub-PR theme: Remove unused dependencies related to langchain and chromadb Relevant files: requirements.txt

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Performance Concern The new implementation loads all markdown files into memory, which could potentially cause memory issues for large documentation sets. Consider implementing a more efficient way to handle large amounts of documentation. Error Handling The code doesn't handle potential file reading errors when loading markdown files. Consider adding try-except blocks to handle IOErrors or similar exceptions. Code Duplication The logic for excluding certain files and folders is repeated. Consider extracting this into a separate function for better maintainability.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	✅ Add error handling for file operations to improve robustness Consider adding error handling when opening and reading files to gracefully handle potential IOErrors or other exceptions that may occur during file operations. pr_agent/tools/pr_help_message.py [102-105] for file in md_files: - with open(file, 'r') as f: - file_path = str(file).replace(str(docs_path), '') - docs_prompt += f"==file name:==\n\n{file_path}\n\n==file content:==\n\n{f.read().strip()}\n=========\n\n" + try: + with open(file, 'r') as f: + file_path = str(file).relative_to(docs_path) + docs_prompt += f"==file name:==\n\n{file_path}\n\n==file content:==\n\n{f.read().strip()}\n=========\n\n" + except IOError as e: + get_logger().error(f"Error reading file {file}: {e}") [Suggestion has been applied] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Adding error handling for file operations is crucial for robustness, as it prevents the program from crashing due to unexpected IO errors, ensuring better fault tolerance and logging of issues.	9
Performance	✅ Use a set for faster lookup of excluded files Suggestion Impact: The list for files_to_exclude was changed to a set, as suggested, to improve lookup performance. code diff: - files_to_exclude = ['EXAMPLE_BEST_PRACTICE.md', 'compression_strategy.md', '/docs/overview/index.md'] + files_to_exclude = {'EXAMPLE_BEST_PRACTICE.md', 'compression_strategy.md', '/docs/overview/index.md'} Consider using a set instead of a list for files_to_exclude to improve lookup performance, especially if the list of excluded files grows larger. pr_agent/tools/pr_help_message.py [90] -files_to_exclude = ['EXAMPLE_BEST_PRACTICE.md', 'compression_strategy.md', '/docs/overview/index.md'] +files_to_exclude = {'EXAMPLE_BEST_PRACTICE.md', 'compression_strategy.md', '/docs/overview/index.md'} Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Using a set for files_to_exclude improves lookup performance, especially as the list grows larger, due to the average O(1) time complexity for lookups in sets compared to O(n) for lists.	8
Enhancement	Simplify and optimize the file filtering logic to improve code readability and performance Consider using a more efficient method to filter out excluded files and folders. The current approach of using multiple list comprehensions can be simplified and optimized. pr_agent/tools/pr_help_message.py [88-91] -md_files = list(docs_path.glob('**/*.md')) -folders_to_exclude = ['/finetuning_benchmark/'] -files_to_exclude = ['EXAMPLE_BEST_PRACTICE.md', 'compression_strategy.md', '/docs/overview/index.md'] -md_files = [file for file in md_files if not any(folder in str(file) for folder in folders_to_exclude) and not any(file.name == file_to_exclude for file_to_exclude in files_to_exclude)] +def is_excluded(file): + return any(folder in str(file) for folder in folders_to_exclude) or file.name in files_to_exclude +md_files = [file for file in docs_path.glob('**/*.md') if not is_excluded(file)] + Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion improves code readability and maintainability by encapsulating the exclusion logic in a function, which can make the code easier to understand and modify. It also slightly optimizes performance by reducing the complexity of the list comprehension.	7
Best practice	Use a more robust method for URL construction to handle potential edge cases in file paths Consider using a more robust method to handle file paths, such as os.path.join() or Path.joinpath(), instead of string concatenation when constructing the base URL for documentation links. pr_agent/tools/pr_help_message.py [138-142] +from urllib.parse import urljoin base_path = "https://qodo-merge-docs.qodo.ai/" -answer_str += f"> - {base_path}{file}#{markdown_header}\n" +answer_str += f"> - {urljoin(base_path, f'{file}#{markdown_header}')}\n" Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: The suggestion to use urljoin enhances the robustness of URL construction, reducing the risk of errors from manual string concatenation, although the current implementation may already suffice for the given context.	6

• Author self-review: I have reviewed the PR code suggestions, and addressed the relevant ones.

💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat