Adding OCP4 multi-arch support #12073
Conversation
|
Start a new ephemeral environment with changes proposed in this pull request: Fedora Environment Oracle Linux 8 Environment |
|
🤖 A k8s content image for this PR is available at: Click here to see how to deploy itIf you alread have Compliance Operator deployed: Otherwise deploy the content and operator together by checking out ComplianceAsCode/compliance-operator and: |
|
@Vincent056 How would you like to continue since metal-toolbox/container-push#77 was merged? |
@yuumasato I was just about to update it, this one should work |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Vincent056 The container file is not identical to what we use downstream, so profiles and products available will be slightly different.
For the moment, I lean towards having identical builds upstream and downstream.
Let's skip sbom, using a forked github action for now before we have metal-toolbox/container-push#77 landed. Modified Dockerfile so we only build certain profiles for s390x and ppc64le. Update github action to build for s390x and ppc64le.
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit 2035c6a and detected 0 issues on this pull request. The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold). This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 59.4% (0.0% change). View more on Code Climate. |
Let's skip sbom, before we have metal-toolbox/container-push#77 landed. Modified Dockerfile so we only build certain profiles for s390x and ppc64le. Update github action to build for s390x and ppc64le.