Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: add input packing example #1311

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 4, 2024
Merged

docs: add input packing example #1311

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 4, 2024

Conversation

ivokub
Copy link
Collaborator

@ivokub ivokub commented Nov 4, 2024

Description

Add an example on how to use a hash of the public inputs to optimize for calldata and proof recursion complexity.

Type of change

  • This change requires a documentation update

How has this been tested?

  • Example

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I did not modify files generated from templates
  • golangci-lint does not output errors locally
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@ivokub ivokub added the doc label Nov 4, 2024
@ivokub ivokub added this to the v0.11.N milestone Nov 4, 2024
@ivokub ivokub requested a review from yelhousni November 4, 2024 11:43
@ivokub ivokub self-assigned this Nov 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@yelhousni yelhousni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

examples/inputpacking/doc.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ivokub ivokub merged commit c975bac into master Nov 4, 2024
5 checks passed
@ivokub ivokub deleted the doc/inputpacking-example branch November 4, 2024 23:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants