bump controller-runtime to v0.19.3

[dsessler7]

Checklist:

• Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like them to be included?
• Have you updated or added documentation for the change, as applicable?
• Have you tested your changes on all related environments with successful results, as applicable?
  • Have you added automated tests?

Type of Changes:

• New feature
• Bug fix
• Documentation
• Testing enhancement
• Other

What is the current behavior (link to any open issues here)?

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Other Information:

[benjaminjb]

Whoa, never saw that lint check before. So the problem is that there are 6 types of PersistentVolumeClaimConditionType and our switch only covers 4?

I lean toward adding a nolint:exhaustive to that to ignore the lint check there. (I'm not even sure it's worth making a ticket to cover the two missing cases, but we could for now and revisit it.)

[cbandy]

I lean toward adding a nolint:exhaustive to that to ignore the lint check there. (I'm not even sure it's worth making a ticket to cover the two missing cases, but we could for now and revisit it.)

👍🏻 The issue raised by the linter shouldn't block this PR. I'm fine with ignoring or nolint or anything that unblocks here.

🔧 I would like an issue for the missing cases. They sound exactly like the resizing that code is supposed to understand.