-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathPhilosophy of Data.bib
executable file
·209 lines (208 loc) · 14.4 KB
/
Philosophy of Data.bib
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
Automatically generated by Mendeley 0.9.9.2
Any changes to this file will be lost if it is regenerated by Mendeley.
@book{Galison1997c,
author = {Galison, P.L.},
file = {:Volumes/Data/localDataNoBackup/z3235728/Mendeley/Galison/Unknown/Galison - 1997 - Image and logic A material culture of microphysics.html:html},
publisher = {University of Chicago Press},
shorttitle = {Image and logic},
title = {{Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics}},
url = {http://books.google.com/books?hl=en\&lr=\&id=6Gcu92U8CwYC\&oi=fnd\&pg=PR13\&dq=Image+and+logic:+A+material+culture+of+microphysics\&ots=8VXZgQdHDa\&sig=J2jrjTapJ76UrD4lgkhp0Dea1Oc},
year = {1997}
}
@inproceedings{Chalmers2004b,
address = {Cambridge, MA, USA},
author = {Chalmers, Matthew and Galani, Areti},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques},
file = {:Volumes/Data/localDataNoBackup/z3235728/Mendeley/Chalmers, Galani/Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems processes, practices, methods, and techniques/Chalmers, Galani - 2004 - Seamful interweaving heterogeneity in the theory and design of interactive systems.html:html},
pages = {243--252},
publisher = {ACM},
title = {{Seamful interweaving: heterogeneity in the theory and design of interactive systems}},
url = {http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1013115.1013149},
year = {2004}
}
@book{Maybin1994c,
author = {Maybin, Janet},
month = apr,
pages = {292},
publisher = {Multilingual Matters Ltd},
shorttitle = {Language and literacy in social practice},
title = {{Language and literacy in social practice: a reader}},
url = {http://books.google.com/books?hl=en\&lr=\&id=cCo2Ray4B7kC\&oi=fnd\&pg=PR1\&dq=Language+and+literacy+in+social+practice:+a+reader\&ots=93TMoCMizg\&sig=OFtvkBlMmtxTt7R7qMLCZwxknbY},
year = {1994}
}
@book{Hogan2003b,
author = {Hogan, Christine},
month = mar,
pages = {500},
publisher = {Kogan Page Ltd},
shorttitle = {Practical facilitation},
title = {{Practical facilitation: A toolkit of techniques}},
url = {http://books.google.com/books?hl=en\&lr=\&id=Eh7PQMTbdX8C\&oi=fnd\&pg=PR11\&dq=Practical+facilitation:+a+toolkit+of+techniques\&ots=mdAVi8DJzC\&sig=ZB6UmY8CJ-shIkP\_1kH1woooyuE},
year = {2003}
}
@book{Oppel2004b,
author = {Oppel, A.J.},
pages = {366},
publisher = {McGraw-Hill Osborne Media},
title = {{Databases demystified}},
url = {http://books.google.com/books?hl=en\&lr=\&id=8TpWEIA9sEcC\&oi=fnd\&pg=PT20\&dq=Databases+demystified\&ots=2sjpWYnStC\&sig=FJSkNejGdAkIo\_LVdTCu6bto\_iQ},
year = {2004}
}
@article{Floridi2004d,
author = {Floridi, L.},
file = {:Volumes/Data/localDataNoBackup/z3235728/Mendeley/Floridi/Metaphilosophy/Floridi - 2004 - Open problems in the philosophy of information:},
journal = {Metaphilosophy},
number = {4},
pages = {554--582},
publisher = {John Wiley \& Sons},
title = {{Open problems in the philosophy of information}},
url = {http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118759729/abstract},
volume = {35},
year = {2004}
}
@article{Swanson2004b,
abstract = {Although organizational innovation with information technology is often carefully considered, bandwagon phenomena indicate that much innovative behavior may nevertheless be of the "me too" variety. In this essay, we explore such differences in innovative behavior. Adopting a perspective that is both institutional and cognitive, we introduce the notion of mindful innovation with IT. A mindful firm attends to an IT innovation with reasoning grounded in its own organizational facts and specifics. We contrast this with mindless innovation, where a firm's actions betray an absence of such attention and grounding. We develop these concepts by drawing on the recent appearance of the idea of mindfulness in the organizational literature, and adapting it for application to IT innovation. We then bring mindfulness and mindlessness together in a larger theoretical synthesis in which these apparent opposites are seen to interact in ways that help to shape the overall landscape of opportunity for organizational innovation with IT. We conclude by suggesting several promising new research directions.},
author = {Swanson, E.B. and Ramiller, N.C.},
file = {:Volumes/Data/localDataNoBackup/z3235728/Mendeley/Swanson, Ramiller/MIS Quarterly/Swanson, Ramiller - 2004 - Innovating mindfully with information technology.pdf:pdf},
journal = {MIS Quarterly},
month = dec,
number = {4},
pages = {553--583},
publisher = {JSTOR},
title = {{Innovating mindfully with information technology}},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/25148655},
volume = {28},
year = {2004}
}
@article{Carmel1993d,
author = {Carmel, E. and Whitaker, R.D. and George, J.F.},
file = {:Volumes/Data/localDataNoBackup/z3235728/Mendeley/Carmel, Whitaker, George/Communications of the ACM/Carmel, Whitaker, George - 1993 - PD and joint application design a transatlantic comparison.html:html},
journal = {Communications of the ACM},
number = {6},
pages = {40--48},
publisher = {ACM},
shorttitle = {PD and joint application design},
title = {{PD and joint application design: a transatlantic comparison}},
url = {http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=153571.163265\&dl=GUIDE\&dl=ACM\&idx=153571\&part=periodical\&WantType=periodical\&title=Communications of the ACM},
volume = {36},
year = {1993}
}
@article{Bryan2005b,
author = {Bryan, L. and Joyce, C.},
file = {:Volumes/Data/localDataNoBackup/z3235728/Mendeley/Bryan, Joyce/McKinsey Quarterly/Bryan, Joyce - 2005 - The 21st-century organization.pdf:pdf},
journal = {McKinsey Quarterly},
pages = {23--33},
title = {{The 21st-century organization}},
url = {http://www.drkresearch.org/Contact\_Us/OB\_750/21st\_century\_organizations\_2005.pdf},
volume = {3},
year = {2005}
}
@inproceedings{Suppes1962,
address = {Stanford},
author = {Suppes, P.},
booktitle = {Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress},
editor = {Nagel;, E. and Suppes;, P. and Tarski, A.},
language = {English},
pages = {252--261},
publisher = {Stanford University Press},
title = {{Models of Data}},
year = {1962}
}
@inproceedings{Vredenburg2002b,
author = {Vredenburg, K. and Mao, J.Y. and Smith, P.W. and Carey, T.},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves},
file = {:Volumes/Data/localDataNoBackup/z3235728/Mendeley/Vredenburg et al./Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Changing our world, changing ourselves/Vredenburg et al. - 2002 - A survey of user-centered design practice.html:html},
pages = {471--478},
publisher = {ACM},
title = {{A survey of user-centered design practice}},
url = {http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=503376.503460},
year = {2002}
}
@inproceedings{Mealy1967,
abstract = {We do not, it seems, have a very clear and commonly agreed upon set of notions about data---either what they are, how they should be fed and cared for, or their relation to the design of programming languages and operating systems. This paper sketches a theory of data which may serve to clarify these questions. It is based on a number of old ideas and may, as a result, seem obvious. Be that as it may, some of these old ideas are not common currency in our field, either separately or in combination; it is hoped that rehashing them in a somewhat new form may prove to be at least suggestive.},
author = {Mealy, George H},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 1967, fall joint computer conference},
doi = {10.1145/1465611.1465682},
keywords = {data definition},
pages = {525--534},
publisher = {ACM},
title = {{Another look at data}},
year = {1967}
}
@article{Zins2007,
abstract = {The field of Information Science is constantly changing. Therefore, information scientists are required to regularly review-and if necessary—redefine its fundamental building blocks. This article is one of a group of four articles, which resulted from a Critical Delphi study conducted in 2003–2005. The study, "Knowledge Map of Information Science," was aimed at exploring the foundations of information science. The international panel was composed of 57 leading scholars from 16 countries, who represent (almost) all the major subfields and important aspects of the field. This particular article documents 130 definitions of data, information, and knowledge formulated by 45 scholars, and maps the major conceptual approaches for defining these three key concepts.
},
author = {Zins, Chaim},
journal = {JASIST},
keywords = {data definitions foundations information knowledge},
number = {4},
pages = {479--493},
title = {{Conceptual Approaches for Defining Data, Information, and Knowledge}},
url = {http://www.success.co.il/is/zins\_definitions\_dik.pdf},
volume = {58},
year = {2007}
}
@inproceedings{Chapin1968,
abstract = {For sharpness in presentation, and for improved reader comprehension, this paper draws frequent contrasts to George H. Mealy's pleasingly-reasoned and useful paper by the title of “Another Look at Data.” 1Since it is assumed that the reader has access to that paper, no summary of it is presented here, but from time to time, some of George H. Mealy's definitions and positions will be paraphrased. This is not to suggest that others have not made contributions. On the contrary, many persons have addressed themselves to the problem of data organization within the confines of information retrieval (see for instance, 2,3), and to the organization of files (see for instance, 4,5,6,7).},
address = {New York},
author = {Chapin, Ned},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 23rd ACM national conference},
doi = {10.1145/800186.810627},
keywords = {data definition},
pages = {631--638},
publisher = {ACM},
title = {{A deeper look at data}},
year = {1968}
}
@inproceedings{Gray2003,
abstract = {It is a commonplace among contemporary information systems professionals that the concepts of data and information are obviously distinct and clearly understood. Through a review of the historical literature, this paper shows that, in fact, the distinction is not obvious, that it is an outgrowth of work in the information systems area, and that the distinction is not clearly understood. The paper briefly notes some of the implications of this historical development for information systems theory. This paper will be of interest primarily to academics and those with an interest in the conceptual foundations and theoretical frameworks guiding Information Systems research.},
address = {Tampa, Florida},
author = {Gray, Robert L},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 9th Americas Conference on Information Systems},
editor = {Ross, J and Galletta, D},
keywords = {data foundations information},
pages = {2843--2849},
publisher = {Association for Information Systems},
title = {{Brief Historical Review of the Development of the Distinction Between Data and Information}},
url = {http://www.cis.gsu.edu/~dtruex/courses/CIS8660/CasesArticles/Gray-Historicalreview-Data-Info AMCIS03.pdf},
year = {2003}
}
@article{Floridi2003,
abstract = {There is no consensus yet on the definition of semantic information. This paper contributes to the current debate by criticising and revising the Standard Definition of semantic Information (SDI) as meaningful data, in favour of the Dretske-Grice approach: meaningful and well-formed data constitute semantic information only if they also qualify as contingently truthful. After a brief introduction, SDI is criticised for providing necessary but insufficient conditions for the definition of semantic information. SDI is incorrect because truth-values do not supervene on semantic information, and misinformation (that is, false semantic information) is not a type of semantic information, but pseudo-information, that is not semantic information at all. This is shown by arguing that none of the reasons for interpreting misinformation as a type of semantic information is convincing, whilst there are compelling reasons to treat it as pseudo-information. As a consequence, SDI is revised to include a necessary truth-condition. The last section summarises the main results of the paper and indicates the important implications of the revised definition for the analysis of the deflationary theories of truth, the standard definition of knowledge and the classic, quantitative theory of semantic information.},
author = {Floridi, Luciano},
journal = {Entropy},
keywords = {data information informationscience meaning philos},
number = {2},
pages = {125--145},
title = {{From Data to Semantic Information}},
url = {http://www.mdpi.org/entropy/papers/e5020125.pdf},
volume = {5},
year = {2003}
}
@article{Floridi2005,
abstract = {There is no consensus yet on the definition of semantic information. This paper contributes to the current debate by criticising and revising the Standard Definition of semantic Information (SDI) as meaningful data, in favour of the Dretske-Grice approach: meaningful and well-formed data constitute semantic information only if they also qualify as contingently truthful. After a brief introduction, SDI is criticised for providing necessary but insufficient conditions for the definition of semantic information. SDI is incorrect because truth-values do not supervene on semantic information, and misinformation (that is, false semantic information) is not a type of semantic information, but pseudo-information, that is not semantic information at all. This is shown by arguing that none of the reasons for interpreting misinformation as a type of semantic information is convincing, whilst there are compelling reasons to treat it as pseudo-information. As a consequence, SDI is revised to include a necessary truth-condition. The last section summarises the main results of the paper and indicates some interesting areas of application of the revised definition.},
author = {Floridi, Luciano},
journal = {Philosophy and Phenomenological Research},
keywords = {data information informationscience meaning philos},
number = {2},
pages = {351--370},
title = {{Is Information Meaningful Data?}},
url = {http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00002536/},
volume = {70},
year = {2005}
}
@book{Kent1978,
author = {Kent, William},
keywords = {data datamodeling foundations},
publisher = {North-Holland},
title = {{Data and Reality. Basic assumptions in data processing reconsidered}},
year = {1978}
}
@inproceedings{Mealy1974,
author = {Mealy, George H},
booktitle = {6th IFIP Congress},
keywords = {data foundations},
pages = {322--325},
title = {{Data Structures Theory and Representation}},
year = {1974}
}