Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Icon Notes not available on some list cards : ThirdParty, Project, Shipment,Products... #13645

Open
josett225 opened this issue Apr 17, 2020 · 12 comments
Labels
Feature request This is a feature request

Comments

@josett225
Copy link
Contributor

josett225 commented Apr 17, 2020

Instructions

This is a template to help you report good issues. You may use Github Markdown syntax to format your issue report.
Please:

  • replace the bracket enclosed texts with meaningful information
  • remove any unused sub-section

Bug

[Icon Notes missing in several list cards : Shipping, Project, ThirdParty, Products, Services,...]

Environment

Version: [11.0.3] and [12.x]
OS: [Linux]
Web server: [Apache/2.2.34 (Unix)]
PHP: [7.4.2]
Database: [MYSqli 5.7.26]
URL(s):[/projet/list.php?leftmenu=projets;/expedition/list.php?leftmenu=sendings;/societe/list.php?leftmenu=thirdparties]


Expected and actual behavior

[The Notes Icon appears in several list cards as Proposal, Order, Invoices as tested. See Screenshots. In Project, Shipment, Products, Thirdparty, the icon doesn't appear. This is great tool to get immediate information to manage projects, shipments whithout the need to discover if there are some notes attached and to get immediate access to the information. The behavior expected is as Proposal, Orders and Invoices. ]

Steps to reproduce the behavior

[Please go to a shipment and/or a project card, select Note Tab and then type a private note. Please go to the list and you will not see the icon on the shipment or project list]

Attached files (Screenshots, screencasts, dolibarr.log, debugging informations…)

[Capture d'écran 2020-04-17 18 30 07
Capture d'écran 2020-04-17 18 30 19
Capture d'écran 2020-04-17 18 30 30
Capture d'écran 2020-04-17 18 30 41
Capture d'écran 2020-04-17 18 31 18
Capture d'écran 2020-04-17 18 44 26
]

@josett225 josett225 added the Bug This is a bug (something does not work as expected) label Apr 17, 2020
@atm-maxime
Copy link
Member

Yes you're right, this icon has been added on some lists but not all for the moment. This is not a bug but a feature request to continue adding this on other lists.

@atm-maxime atm-maxime added Feature request This is a feature request and removed Bug This is a bug (something does not work as expected) labels Apr 17, 2020
@josett225
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @atm-maxime thanks for answering. Is there any chance to get it done in V12 as in a usability and time adoption end user perspective, to get it in project/opportunity and shipment lists, its critical business requirement. There are more than 200 opportunities and 200 shipments in a flow window. Maybe we are wrong in using the following user behavior process. Status and Icons with particularly Notes icon (MAIN_AUTO_TIMESTAMP_IN_PRIVATE_NOTES activated : Time Stamp and User Stamp) are used with different usersgroup to run the full process from opportunities/Proposals/orders/shipments/invoices. So small things can make a huge business impact.

@atm-maxime
Copy link
Member

Hi !
V12 is already frozen and the beta just started, so there will be no new feature. And to "get it done", you need a developer to volunteer for the task, open-source project is based on volonteering, so there's no expectations to have. Or you can fund a developer to do it and share with the community.
As for your own process, I couldn't tell if it's appropriate without knowing it, but maybe you can check on extrafields to store data on your business documents and use them on lists with filters.
Cheers :)

@josett225
Copy link
Contributor Author

@atm-maxime Thanks for your return. Yes I perfectly understand your opensource volunteer explanation as I already funded several OpenSource projects/companies. I am ready to evaluate funding if I know either who has the skills on this specific item (don't want to lose funding on reverse engineering time) or if we could fund the core team association or if the process is explained somewhere to make it develop internally. How to be sure this development will be added in the core (after review and validation of course) in the future as I don't want to get specific code to be maintained and then struggle each time a new Dolibarr release is coming out? You raised a beta is coming soon. where could we find the beta information? As a enduser and admin of the solution, is there any usergroup/conference where we could attend virtually to share inputs, feedback, get info or requests? Be part of the association could help?

@atm-maxime
Copy link
Member

@josett225 Any active developer in the community would have the skills to do this task. The Dolibarr fundation is not concerned by technical developments, so if you want this to be developed and added to the core you should contact one of the Dolibarr partners. They're listed in the Dolibarr wiki.
Information about new releases and beta are shared on Dolibarr websites, forums, social medias, ... (https://www.dolibarr.org/forum/). These are the places you can find many informations and share with others.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Issue Stale (automatic label) This issue is stale because it has been open 1 year with no activity. Remove this label to keep open label May 22, 2021
@atm-maxime
Copy link
Member

Still relevant

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Issue Stale (automatic label) This issue is stale because it has been open 1 year with no activity. Remove this label to keep open label May 25, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Issue Stale (automatic label) This issue is stale because it has been open 1 year with no activity. Remove this label to keep open label May 25, 2022
@josett225
Copy link
Contributor Author

josett225 commented May 25, 2022 via email

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Issue Stale (automatic label) This issue is stale because it has been open 1 year with no activity. Remove this label to keep open label May 25, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Issue Stale (automatic label) This issue is stale because it has been open 1 year with no activity. Remove this label to keep open label May 26, 2023
@josett225
Copy link
Contributor Author

Still required.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Issue Stale (automatic label) This issue is stale because it has been open 1 year with no activity. Remove this label to keep open label May 27, 2023
@josett225
Copy link
Contributor Author

josett225 commented Nov 12, 2023

Hi @eldy and @atm-maxime

After 3 years learning Dolibarr with both using it internally and deploying it in several customers thru Pichinov based in Toulouse and after some PRs, I started the project to add notes in all objects list.
I would like your advise before sending all the PRs.
I divided the project in 2 phases :

  • Add both public notes and private notes in actual objects. I changed the color of private picto in black and let the public note in grey (as today)
    Here is the first example with Order list.
    CommandeNotesGlobal
    CommandeNotesPrivate
    CommandeNotesPublic

  • Add same structure in all objects without notes
    Here is an example with products list :
    ProductNoteGlobal
    ProductNotePublic
    ProductNotePrivate

Could you please comment or amend the project?

Best Regards

Jose

@atm-maxime
Copy link
Member

Hi Jose !
My point of view on this subject is that we should avoid adding too many pictos on lists. Maybe only one picto as it is now but displaying both public and private note in the tooltip is a good solution?
Happy to hear you have achieved work on this matter to share with the community!

@josett225
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @atm-maxime

Thanks a lot for the feedback, I will work on it based on your comment and 2 ideas I have to keep it clear between public only, private only or both.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Issue Stale (automatic label) This issue is stale because it has been open 1 year with no activity. Remove this label to keep open label Nov 12, 2024
@josett225
Copy link
Contributor Author

Still in progress

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Issue Stale (automatic label) This issue is stale because it has been open 1 year with no activity. Remove this label to keep open label Nov 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature request This is a feature request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants