Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tweak title and abstract to more clear talk about EDHOC. #19

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mcr
Copy link
Collaborator

@mcr mcr commented May 31, 2023

AFAIK, abstracts are not supposed to use acronyms, might need some more changes

AFAIK, abstracts are not supposed to use acronyms, might need some more changes
@gselander
Copy link
Collaborator

I think we agreed in the meeting that we should have a setup that allows different instantiations and where BRSKI is one. Alternative formulation (inspired by this text) in #22

@mcr
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mcr commented Jun 1, 2023

I'm looking forward to the description of what these other instantiations are.
Can you please give them names? How do they differ? How does mentioning that this is similar to BRSKI hurt?

@gselander
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm looking forward to the description of what these other instantiations are.
Can you please give them names?

We mentioned EAP and one-touch in the meeting.

How do they differ? How does mentioning that this is similar to BRSKI hurt?

It does not. BRSKI is mentioned in #22, see Introduction.

@gselander
Copy link
Collaborator

gselander commented Jul 4, 2023

Are people happy with merging #22 and closing this?

@malishav
Copy link
Collaborator

malishav commented Jul 4, 2023

WFM

@gselander
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing this since #22 is merged.

@gselander gselander closed this Jul 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants