-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adopt RFC2119 terms for requirements language #48
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
source/transfer_list.rst
Outdated
containing platform-specific data or internal structures specific to a single | ||
firmware implementation is no reason not to allocate a standardized tag for it | ||
firmware implementation, should allocate a standardized tag for it |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That makes it significantly weaker. Is there a way to encourage this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This reword was a nitpick.
It's simply removing the double negative.
We can drop the change.
I've reworded the sentence a bit in the latest push (hopefully respecting the original language):
"
In particular, a creator of a TE that just contains platform-specific data or internal structures specific to a single firmware implementation, should allocate a standardized tag for it in this specification -- using the non-standardized range is strongly discouraged.
"
817a9e5
to
74c0a3a
Compare
The IETF RFC2119 defines terms for requirements and guidance statements. This commit changes the spec to adopt those terms, where relevant, and requires future contributions to comply with RFC2119. Fix FirmwareHandoff#30 Change-Id: Ia4cc7f44bcd4508025f30d2410e83802c6ec4a11 Signed-off-by: Jose Marinho <jose.marinho@arm.com>
The IETF RFC2119 defines terms for requirements and guidance statements. This commit changes the spec to adopt those terms, where relevant, and requires future contributions to comply with RFC2119.
Fix #30
Change-Id: Ia4cc7f44bcd4508025f30d2410e83802c6ec4a11