chore: Ignore TYPE_CHECKING in coverage by default

[khvn26]

Thanks for submitting a PR! Please check the boxes below:

• I have run pre-commit to check linting
• I have added information to docs/ if required so people know about the feature!
• I have filled in the "Changes" section below?
• I have filled in the "How did you test this code" section below?
• I have used a Conventional Commit title for this Pull Request

Changes

After merging this PR, we won't have to manually mark imports under if TYPE_CHECKING: and abstract methods with # pragma: no cover.

How did you test this code?

This is a CI change.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
docs	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	May 7, 2024 4:45pm
flagsmith-frontend-preview	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	May 7, 2024 4:45pm
flagsmith-frontend-staging	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	May 7, 2024 4:45pm

[github-actions]

Uffizzi Preview deployment-51385 was deleted.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.92%. Comparing base (b66747f) to head (7f10209).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3891      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.87%   95.92%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files        1134     1134              
  Lines       36009    35958      -51     
==========================================
- Hits        34522    34493      -29     
+ Misses       1487     1465      -22     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.