Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: behaviours on chat page #648

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2024
Merged

fix: behaviours on chat page #648

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

FleetAdmiralJakob
Copy link
Owner

@FleetAdmiralJakob FleetAdmiralJakob commented Nov 5, 2024

  • updated styles so the loading bar is in the center

  • updated the useScrollBehaviourHook to not scroll down on the first render the messages

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced scroll behavior on the chat page for a smoother user experience.
    • Improved error handling for unauthorized access, redirecting users appropriately.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted rendering logic to ensure proper layout during message display.

- updated styles so the loading bar is in the center

- updated the useScrollBehaviourHook to not scroll down on the first render the messages
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 5, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
chat-io ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 5, 2024 1:53am

Copy link

sweep-ai bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Hey @FleetAdmiralJakob, here is an example of how you can ask me to improve this pull request:

@Sweep Add unit tests for the `useScrollBehavior` hook to verify:
1. Initial load behavior (should scroll instantly without animation)
2. Subsequent message updates (should scroll smoothly)
3. The `scrollToBottom` function with both smooth and instant scroll behaviors

📖 For more information on how to use Sweep, please read our documentation.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes made in the chat page component of the application focus on enhancing the scrolling behavior and refining error handling. A new isFirstLoad reference has been introduced to manage scroll behavior during the initial message load. The scrollToBottom function has been modified to accept a smooth parameter for customizable scrolling. Additionally, the rendering logic for messages has been adjusted, and error handling has been improved to redirect users in case of unauthorized access.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/app/(internal-sites)/chats/[chatId]/page.tsx - Added isFirstLoad reference for initial scroll management.
- Updated scrollToBottom function to accept a smooth parameter.
- Modified useEffect for different scroll behavior on first load vs. subsequent updates.
- Changed message section class from min-h-full to h-full.
- Refined error handling for unauthorized requests, redirecting users accordingly.

Poem

🐇 In the chat where messages flow,
A smooth scroll now steals the show!
First load's quick, then gentle sway,
Errors caught, no more dismay.
Hopping through updates, all feels right,
Our chat's a joy, a pure delight! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/app/(internal-sites)/chats/[chatId]/page.tsx (1)

100-109: Consider adding a cleanup function to the useEffect.

While the scroll behavior logic is correct, it's a good practice to include a cleanup function in useEffect hooks, even if it might not be strictly necessary in this case.

Consider adding a cleanup function:

  useEffect(() => {
    if (messages) {
      if (isFirstLoad.current) {
        scrollToBottom(false);
        isFirstLoad.current = false;
      } else {
        scrollToBottom(true);
      }
    }
+   return () => {
+     // Reset isFirstLoad when component unmounts
+     isFirstLoad.current = true;
+   };
  }, [messages, scrollToBottom]);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7b82346 and ee155f7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/app/(internal-sites)/chats/[chatId]/page.tsx (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/app/(internal-sites)/chats/[chatId]/page.tsx (3)

78-78: LGTM: Well-implemented first load tracking.

The isFirstLoad ref is correctly initialized and used to differentiate between initial and subsequent renders.


91-97: LGTM: Well-designed scroll function with backward compatibility.

The scrollToBottom function is well implemented with:

  • Optional smooth parameter defaulting to true
  • Proper null checks using optional chaining
  • Clear behavior distinction between smooth and instant scrolling

366-366: Verify layout behavior with varying content lengths.

The change from min-h-full to h-full ensures the container takes exactly the full height, but we should verify that this doesn't cause issues with:

  1. Very long message lists that need scrolling
  2. Very short message lists that might leave empty space

Let's verify the layout behavior:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a final response as the findings show a well-implemented scroll behavior system:

The layout change from min-h-full to h-full is safe and properly implemented

The container's scroll behavior is well-handled because:

  • The parent element has overflow-x-hidden and proper scroll handlers
  • There's a robust scroll management system with useScrollBehavior hook that handles:
    • Automatic scrolling for new messages
    • Smooth and instant scroll behaviors
    • Bottom detection and scroll position tracking
  • The container is part of a flex layout that ensures proper height distribution
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential scroll-related issues in the codebase

# Test 1: Look for scroll-related styles or overflow handling
echo "Checking for scroll-related styles:"
rg -A 2 'overflow-[xy]|scroll' src/app

# Test 2: Check for height-related classes that might conflict
echo "Checking for height-related classes:"
rg -A 2 'h-full|min-h-full|max-h' src/app

# Test 3: Look for existing scroll behavior tests
echo "Checking for scroll-related tests:"
fd -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx | xargs rg 'scroll'

Length of output: 9532

@FleetAdmiralJakob FleetAdmiralJakob merged commit b31e9b1 into main Nov 5, 2024
8 checks passed
@FleetAdmiralJakob FleetAdmiralJakob deleted the update-chat-page branch November 5, 2024 01:59
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant