You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the feature you'd like
Support for CID (CI doubles) calculations.
Describe what the current code offers in relation to what it lacks
We already support SpinResolvedSelectedONVBasis, so we can support 'slow' spin-resolved CID calculations by implementing a named constructor on SpinResolvedSelectedONVBasis.
The hard part would be figuring out the addressing scheme for spin-resolved CID.
Additional context
This issue is brought over from #234.
This discussion was converted from issue #714 on December 11, 2020 07:50.
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Describe the feature you'd like
Support for CID (CI doubles) calculations.
Describe what the current code offers in relation to what it lacks
SpinResolvedSelectedONVBasis
, so we can support 'slow' spin-resolved CID calculations by implementing a named constructor onSpinResolvedSelectedONVBasis
.Additional context
This issue is brought over from #234.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions