Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disable Submit Button to Prevent Duplicate Submissions #4275

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

jperson1
Copy link
Contributor

@jperson1 jperson1 commented Sep 12, 2024

Disable Submit Button to Prevent Duplicate Submissions

Issue: #4274

Changes:

  1. Add a new util.js file. It contains a disableSubmitAfterClick function, which does exactly as one would expect.
  2. Apply disable-submit-after-click to the final submission button.

How to test:

  1. Switch to this branch and run normally. Ensure that a collectstatic is run as part of this process, so that the JS changes come through.
  2. Bring a record to the final submission stage.
    • Manually works, and so does a wonky Cypress run.
    • docker compose run web python manage.py load_fixtures can also help, if you've logged in once. If you do this, don't expect the submission to actually go through.
  3. Maybe, stall out the submission to give you time to see that the button disables properly.
    • A time.sleep(5) or similar should then by placed around line 715 of backend/audit/views/views.py.
  4. Try to submit. See that the button disables, and then the form submits normally.

Recording:

In this example, I have intentionally stalled out the final submission by five seconds, to show that the button does disable.

I'm also using a submission that will fail the final dissemination, so that I can reuse it when testing.

Screen.Recording.2024-09-12.at.4.34.47.PM.mov

PR Checklist: Submitter

  • Link to an issue if possible. If there’s no issue, describe what your branch does. Even if there is an issue, a brief description in the PR is still useful.
  • List any special steps reviewers have to follow to test the PR. For example, adding a local environment variable, creating a local test file, etc.
  • For extra credit, submit a screen recording like this one.
  • Make sure you’ve merged main into your branch shortly before creating the PR. (You should also be merging main into your branch regularly during development.)
  • Make sure you’ve accounted for any migrations. When you’re about to create the PR, bring up the application locally and then run git status | grep migrations. If there are any results, you probably need to add them to the branch for the PR. Your PR should have only one new migration file for each of the component apps, except in rare circumstances; you may need to delete some and re-run python manage.py makemigrations to reduce the number to one. (Also, unless in exceptional circumstances, your PR should not delete any migration files.)
  • Make sure that whatever feature you’re adding has tests that cover the feature. This includes test coverage to make sure that the previous workflow still works, if applicable.
  • Make sure the full-submission.cy.js Cypress test passes, if applicable.
  • Do manual testing locally. Our tests are not good enough yet to allow us to skip this step. If that’s not applicable for some reason, check this box.
  • Verify that no Git surgery was necessary, or, if it was necessary at any point, repeat the testing after it’s finished.
  • Once a PR is merged, keep an eye on it until it’s deployed to dev, and do enough testing on dev to verify that it deployed successfully, the feature works as expected, and the happy path for the broad feature area (such as submission) still works.
  • Ensure that prior to merging, the working branch is up to date with main and the terraform plan is what you expect.

PR Checklist: Reviewer

  • Pull the branch to your local environment and run make docker-clean; make docker-first-run && docker compose up; then run docker compose exec web /bin/bash -c "python manage.py test"
  • Manually test out the changes locally, or check this box to verify that it wasn’t applicable in this case.
  • Check that the PR has appropriate tests. Look out for changes in HTML/JS/JSON Schema logic that may need to be captured in Python tests even though the logic isn’t in Python.
  • Verify that no Git surgery is necessary at any point (such as during a merge party), or, if it was, repeat the testing after it’s finished.

The larger the PR, the stricter we should be about these points.

Pre Merge Checklist: Merger

  • Ensure that prior to approving, the terraform plan is what we expect it to be. -/+ resource "null_resource" "cors_header" should be destroying and recreating its self and ~ resource "cloudfoundry_app" "clamav_api" might be updating its sha256 for the fac-file-scanner and fac-av-${ENV} by default.
  • Ensure that the branch is up to date with main.
  • Ensure that a terraform plan has been recently generated for the pull request.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 12, 2024

Terraform plan for meta

Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.
Terraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
!~  update in-place

Terraform will perform the following actions:

  # module.environments["production"].cloudfoundry_space.space will be updated in-place
!~  resource "cloudfoundry_space" "space" {
!~      allow_ssh         = true -> false
        id                = "5593dba8-7023-49a5-bdbe-e809fe23edf9"
        name              = "production"
#        (10 unchanged attributes hidden)
    }

Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.

Warning: Argument is deprecated

  with module.s3-backups.cloudfoundry_service_instance.bucket,
  on /tmp/terraform-data-dir/modules/s3-backups/s3/main.tf line 14, in resource "cloudfoundry_service_instance" "bucket":
  14:   recursive_delete = var.recursive_delete

Since CF API v3, recursive delete is always done on the cloudcontroller side.
This will be removed in future releases

❌ Plan not applied in Deploy to Development and Management Environment #806 (Plan has changed)

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 12, 2024

Terraform plan for dev

Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 1 to destroy.
Terraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
-/+ destroy and then create replacement

Terraform will perform the following actions:

  # module.dev.module.cors.null_resource.cors_header must be replaced
-/+ resource "null_resource" "cors_header" {
!~      id       = "*******************" -> (known after apply)
!~      triggers = { # forces replacement
!~          "always_run" = "2024-09-12T20:19:12Z" -> (known after apply)
        }
    }

Plan: 1 to add, 0 to change, 1 to destroy.

Warning: Argument is deprecated

  with module.dev-backups-bucket.cloudfoundry_service_instance.bucket,
  on /tmp/terraform-data-dir/modules/dev-backups-bucket/s3/main.tf line 14, in resource "cloudfoundry_service_instance" "bucket":
  14:   recursive_delete = var.recursive_delete

Since CF API v3, recursive delete is always done on the cloudcontroller side.
This will be removed in future releases

(and 6 more similar warnings elsewhere)

❌ Plan not applied in Deploy to Development and Management Environment #806 (Plan has changed)

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 12, 2024

☂️ Python Coverage

current status: ✅

Overall Coverage

Lines Covered Coverage Threshold Status
18378 16735 91% 0% 🟢

New Files

No new covered files...

Modified Files

No covered modified files...

updated for commit: 8c64ff9 by action🐍

@jperson1 jperson1 marked this pull request as ready for review September 12, 2024 15:41
@jperson1 jperson1 requested a review from a team September 12, 2024 16:17
@jperson1 jperson1 added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 18, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit baabe97 Sep 18, 2024
16 checks passed
@jperson1 jperson1 deleted the jp/prevent-duplicate-final-submissions branch September 18, 2024 15:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants