Grace (short for Fall-from-Grace) is a ready-to-fork implementation of a JSON-compatible functional programming language with type inference. You will most likely be interested in Grace for one of two reasons:
-
You need to implement a domain-specific language and you would like to begin from a quality existing implementation instead of embedding a syntax tree in JSON/YAML
-
You're interested in learning more about state-of-the-art algorithms for programming language theory by studying a clear and realistic reference implementation
If you're interested in code samples, then you can either jump down to the Quick tour section or check out the examples directory.
You can also try out Fall-from-Grace in your browser by visiting this page:
You can build the grace
executable using cabal
:
$ cabal build exe:grace
Note: For older versions of cabal (e.g. version <3), use cabal new-build exe:grace
. Known to work for at least cabal v.2.4
You can also build this project using Nix:
$ nix --extra-experimental-features 'nix-command flakes' build
… and you can build the live demo website for this project also using Nix:
$ nix --extra-experimental-features 'nix-command flakes' build .#website
You can also run grace
without explicitly installing it:
$ nix --extra-experimental-features 'nix-command flakes' run github:Gabriella439/grace -- --help
Grace implements the following features so that you don't have to:
-
Efficient and maintainable parsing
Grace uses a lexer in conjunction with an Earley parser in order to improve the efficiency and predictability of parsing performance. In particular, the parser will run in linear time for any grammar accepted by an LR parser.
-
JSON-compatible syntax
Grace uses the same syntax as JSON for records, lists, and scalar values, which means that many JSON expression are already valid Grace expressions:
# This is valid Grace source code { "clients": [ { "isActive": true, "age": 36, "name": "Dunlap Hubbard", "email": "dunlaphubbard@cedward.com", "phone": "+1 (890) 543-2508" }, { "isActive": true, "age": 24, "name": "Kirsten Sellers", "email": "kirstensellers@emergent.com", "phone": "+1 (831) 564-2190" } ] }
Don't like JSON syntax? No problem, the grammar is easy to change.
-
Bidirectional type-inference and type-checking
Grace's type system is based on the Complete and Easy Bidirectional Typechecking for Higher-Rank Polymorphism paper. This algorithm permits most types to be inferred without type annotations and the remaining types can be inferred with a single top-level type annotation.
-
JSON-compatible type system
JSON permits all sorts of nonsense that would normally be rejected by typed languages, but Grace's type system is sufficiently advanced that most JSON expressions can be made valid with a type signature, like this:
[ 1, [] ] : List (exists (a : Type) . a)
… and this doesn't compromise the soundness of the type system.
-
Dhall-style imports
You can import subexpressions by referencing their path or URL. You can also import JSON in the way same way since Grace is a superset of JSON.
-
Fast evaluation
Grace implements normalization by evaluation to efficiently interpret code.
The interpreter also doesn't need to warm up and has a low startup overhead of tens of milliseconds, so Grace is suitable for short-lived command-line tools.
-
Fixes to several JSON design mistakes
The Grace interpreter supports comments, leading/trailing commas, and unquoted field names for input code while still emitting valid JSON output.
This means that you can use Grace as a starting point for an ergonomic JSON preprocessor (similar to jsonnet, but with types).
-
Error messages with source locations
Grace generates accurate and informative source locations in error messages, such as this:
Not a subtype The following type: Bool (input):1:18: │ 1 │ [ { x: 1 }, { x: true } ] │ ↑ … cannot be a subtype of: Natural (input):1:8: │ 1 │ [ { x: 1 }, { x: true } ] │ ↑
-
Syntax highlighting and code formatting
The interpreter highlights and auto-formats code, both for results and error messages. Note that the code formatter does not preserve comments (in order to simplify the implementation).
-
Open records and open unions
Grace extends the bidirectional type-checking algorithm with support for inferring the types of open records (also known as row polymorphism) and open unions (also known as polymorphic variants). This lets you easily work with records or unions where not all fields or alternatives are known in advance.
-
Universal quantification and existential quantification
Universal quantification lets you specify "generic" types (i.e. types parameterized on other types).
Existential quantification lets you specify incomplete / partial types (i.e. types with holes that that the interpreter infers).
Both universal and existential quantification work with types, open records, and open unions.
Also, the package and the code is extensively commented and documented to help you get started making changes. You can also read the CONTRIBUTING guide for instructions on how to get started.
Grace does not support the following language features:
-
Input / output ("IO")
Grace only supports pure computation and doesn't support an effect system for managing or sequencing effects
-
Type classes
These require global coherence, which does not play nice with Dhall-style path-based imports
-
Type synonyms
You cannot easily create short-hand synonyms for commonly used types
-
User-defined datatypes
All data types in Grace are anonymous (e.g. anonymous records and anonymous unions), and there is no concept of a data declaration
-
Recursion or recursive data types
Grace only supports two built-in recursive types, which are
List
andJSON
, but does not support user-defined recursion or anonymous recursion. -
String interpolation
This is possible, but tricky, to lex, so I decided that it would be simpler to remove the feature.
Grace also does not support the following tooling:
-
A language server
I will accept pull requests for this, but I don't plan on maintaining a language server myself since it's a lot of work and is a large surface area to maintain.
-
Code formatter that preserves comments
I will probably reject pull requests to add this because I expect this would really clutter up the implementation and the concrete syntax tree.
-
Extensive documentation
Grace is not really meant to be used directly, but is instead intended to be forked and used as a starting point for your own language, so any documentation written for Grace would need to be substantially rewritten as you adjust the language to your needs.
That said, this
README
has a brief tour of the language below.If you still need an example of a tutorial for a similar language that you can adapt, see the Dhall language tour.
You can get started on changing the language to your liking by reading the CONTRIBUTING guide.
If you're interested in upstreaming your changes, then these are the issues and pull requests I'm most likely to accept:
-
Bug fixes
-
Improving error messages
-
Fixes to build against the latest version of GHC or dependencies
-
Adding new built-ins
… especially if they are likely to be widely used by downstream implementations.
-
Adding features with a high power-to-weight ratio
Basically, anything that isn't too complicated and likely to be generally useful is fair game, especially if it's easy for forks to delete or disable if they don't want it.
-
Simpler and clearer ways of implementing existing functionality
For example, if you think there's a way to simplify the type-checker, parser, or evaluator without too much regression in functionality then I'll probably accept it.
-
Adding more comments or clearer contributing instructions
… so that people can more easily adapt the language to their own use case.
-
Syntactic sugar
For example, I'd probably accept pull requests to compress the syntax for nested
forall
s or nested lambdas.
These are the issues and pull requests that I'm most likely to reject:
-
Anything that significantly increases my maintenance burden
This project is more of an educational resource, like an executable blog post, than a production-ready package. So I commit to maintaining to this about as much as I commit to maintaining a blog post (which is to say: not much at all, other than to merge or reject pull requests).
-
Anything that significantly deteriorates the clarity of the code
It's far more important to me that this code is pedagogically useful than the code being production-ready. Again, think of this project as an executable tutorial that people can learn from.
-
Any request to publish binaries or official releases
This project is made to be forked, not directly used. If you want to publish anything, then fork the project and maintain binaries/releases yourself.
Your fork doesn't need to credit me or this project, beyond what the BSD 3-clause license requires. The only thanks I need is for people to use Grace instead of creating yet another domain-specific language embedded in JSON or YAML.
This section provides a lightning tour that covers all language features as briefly as possible, directed at people who already have some experience with typed and functional programming languages.
This package builds a grace
executable with the following command-line API:
$ grace --help
Usage: grace COMMAND
Command-line utility for the Grace language
Available options:
-h,--help Show this help text
Available commands:
interpret Interpret a Grace file
text Render a Grace text literal
format Format Grace code
builtins List all built-in functions and their types
repl Enter a REPL for Grace
You can use the interpret
subcommand for interpreting a single file:
# ./example.ffg
let greet = \name -> "Hello, " + name + "!"
in greet "world"
$ grace interpret example.ffg
"Hello, world!"
… and you can specify -
to process standard input instead of a file, like
this:
$ grace interpret - <<< '2 + 2'
4
You can also use the repl
subcommand for interactive usage:
$ grace repl
>>> :let x = 1
>>> :let y = 2
>>> x + y
3
Grace supports the following Scalar types:
-
Bool
s, such asfalse
andtrue
-
Natural
numbers, such as0
,1
,2
, … -
Integer
s, such as-2
,-1
,0
,1
,2
, …Natural
numbers are a subtype ofInteger
s -
Real
s, such as3.14159265
,6.0221409e+23
, …Integer
s are a subtype ofReal
s -
Text
, such as""
,"Hello!"
,"ABC"
, …Text
supports JSON-style escape sequences
… and the following complex data structures:
-
List
s, such as[]
,[ 2, 3, 5 ]
, … -
Optional
types, such asnull
There is no special syntax for a present
Optional
value. Every typeT
is a subtype ofOptional T
. For example:[ 1, null ] : List (Optional Natural)
-
Records, such as
{}
,{ x: 2.9, y: -1.4 }
Record field names usually don't need to be quoted unless they require special characters
-
Unions, such as
Left 1
,Right True
Any identifer beginning with an uppercase character is a union tag. You don't need to specify the type of the union, since union types are open and inferred.
-
JSON, such as
[ 1, [ true, "" ] ]
… which is a supertype of all expressions that are also valid JSON.
Note that unions are the only data structure that is not JSON-compatible, since JSON does not support unions.
You can nest complex data structures arbitrarily, such as this example list of package dependencies:
[ GitHub
{ repository: "https://github.com/Gabriel439/Haskell-Turtle-Library.git"
, revision: "ae5edf227b515b34c1cb6c89d9c58ea0eece12d5"
}
, Local { path: "~/proj/optparse-applicative" }
, Local { path: "~/proj/discrimination" }
, Hackage { package: "lens", version: "4.15.4" }
, GitHub
{ repository: "https://github.com/haskell/text.git"
, revision: "ccbfabedea1cf5b38ff19f37549feaf01225e537"
}
, Local { path: "~/proj/servant-swagger" }
, Hackage { package: "aeson", version: "1.2.3.0" }
]
You can annotate a value with type using the :
operator. The left argument
to the operator is a value and the right argument is the expected type:
true : Bool
# ↑ ↑
# Value Expected type
You can also ask to include the inferred type of an interpreted expression as
a type annotation using the --annotate
flag:
$ grace interpret --annotate - <<< '[ 2, 3, 5 ]'
[ 2, 3, 5 ] : List Natural
Here are some example values annotated with types::
true : Bool
"Hello" : Text
1 : Natural
1 : Integer # `Natural` numbers also type-check as `Integer`s
1 : Real # All numbers type-check as `Real`s
1 : Optional Natural # Everything type-checks as `Optional`, too
[ true, false ] : List Bool
[ ] : forall (a : Type) . List a
{ name: "John", age: 24 } : { name: Text, age: Natural }
Left 1 : forall (a : Alternatives) . < Left: Natural | a >
[ Left 1, Right true ]
: forall (a : Alternatives) . List < Left: Natural | Right: Bool | a >
Integer/even : Integer -> Bool
[ 1, true ] : JSON # Any expression that is valid JSON type-checks as `JSON`
Grace supports some operators out-of-the-box, such as:
- Addition:
2 + 3
- Multiplication:
2 * 3
- Logical conjunction:
true && false
- Logical disjunction:
true || false
- Text concatenation:
"AB" + "CD"
- List concatenation:
[ 2, 3 ] + [ 5, 7 ]
You can also consume boolean values using if
/ then
/ else
expressions:
$ grace interpret - <<< 'if true then 0 else 1'
0
You can define immutable and lexically-scoped variables using the let
and
in
keywords:
let name = "redis"
let version = "6.0.14"
in name + "-" + version
You can access record fields using .
:
let record = { turn: 1, health: 100 }
in record.turn
You can pattern match on a union using the merge
keyword by providing a
record of handlers (one per alternative):
let render
: < Left: Real | Right: Bool > -> Text
= merge
{ Left: Real/show
, Right: \b -> if b then "true" else "false"
}
in [ render (Left 2.0), render (Right true) ]
There is no way to consume Optional
values (not even using merge
). The
Optional
type solely exists for compatibility with JSON (so that null
is
not rejected). If you actually want a usable Optional
type then use a
union with constructors named Some
or None
(or whatever names you prefer):
let values = [ Some 1, None { } ]
let toNumber = merge { Some: \n -> n, None: \_ -> 0 }
in List/map toNumber values
If you don't care about JSON compatibility then you can edit the language to
remove null
and Optional
.
Grace supports anonymous functions using \input -> output
syntax. For
example:
let twice = \x -> [ x, x ]
in twice 2
You can also use the built-in functions, including:
# Compare two `Reals` for equality
Real/equal : Real -> Real -> Bool
# Check if one `Real` is less than another `Real`
Real/lessThan : Real -> Real -> Bool
# Negate a `Real` number
Real/negate : Real -> Real
# Render a `Real` number as `Text`
Real/show : Real -> Text
# Drop the first N elements from a `List`
List/drop : forall (a : Type) . Natural -> List a -> List a
# Compare two lists for equality, given an element-wise equality test
List/equal : forall (a : Type) . (a -> a -> Bool) -> List a -> List a -> Bool
# Fold a list
List/fold
: forall (a : Type) .
forall (b : Type) .
{ cons: a -> b -> b, nil: b } -> List a -> b
# Get the first element of a list
List/head
: forall (a : Type) .
forall (b : Alternatives) .
List a -> < Some: a | None: { } | b >
# Annotate each element of a list with its index
List/indexed : forall (a : Type) . List a -> List { index: Natural, value: a }
# Get the last element of a list
List/last
: forall (a : Type) .
forall (b : Alternatives) .
List a -> < Some: a | None: { } | b >
# Compute the length of a list
List/length : forall (a : Type) . List a -> Natural
# Transform each element of a list
List/map : forall (a : Type) . forall (b : Type) . (a -> b) -> List a -> List b
# Reverse a list
List/reverse : forall (a : Type) . List a -> List a
# Take the first N elements of a list
List/take : forall (a : Type) . Natural -> List a -> List a
# Returns `true` if the `Integer` is even
Integer/even : Integer -> Bool
# Negate an `Integer`
Integer/negate : Integer -> Integer
# Returns `true` if the `Integer` is false
Integer/odd : Integer -> Bool
# Compute the absolute value of an `Integer`
Integer/abs : Integer -> Natural
# Fold a JSON value
JSON/fold
: forall (a : Type) .
{ array: List a -> a
, bool: Bool -> a
, real: Real -> a
, integer: Integer -> a
, natural: Natural -> a
, "null": a
, object: List { key: Text, value: a } -> a
, string: Text -> a
} ->
JSON ->
a
# Fold a `Natural` number
Natural/fold : forall (a : Type) . Natural -> (a -> a) -> a -> a
# Compare two `Text` values for equality
Text/equal : Text -> Text -> Bool
For an up-to-date list of builtin functions and their types, run
the grace builtins
subcommand.
By default, the type-checker will infer a polymorphic type for a function if you haven't yet used the function:
$ grace interpret --annotate - <<< '\x -> [ x, x ]'
(\x -> [ x, x ]) : forall (a : Type) . a -> List a
However, if you use the function at least once then the type-checker will infer a monomorphic type by default, so code like the following:
let twice = \x -> [ x, x ]
in twice (twice 2)
… will be rejected with a type error like this:
Not a subtype
The following type:
List Natural
./example.ffg:1:19:
│
1 │ let twice = \x -> [ x, x ]
│ ↑
… cannot be a subtype of:
Natural
./example.ffg:1:14:
│
1 │ let twice = \x -> [ x, x ]
│ ↑
… because the inner use of twice
thinks x
should be a Natural
and the
outer use of twice
thinks x
shoud be a List Natural
.
However, you can fix this by adding a type signature to make the universal quantification explicit:
let twice : forall (a : Type) . a -> List a
= \x -> [ x, x ]
in twice (twice 2)
… and then the example type-checks. You can read that type as saying that the
twice
function works forall
possible Type
s that we could assign to a
(including both Natural
and List Natural
)..
You can also use existential quantification for parts of the type signature that you wish to omit:
let numbers : exists (a : Type) . List a
= [ 2, 3, 5 ]
in numbers
The type-checker will accept the above example and infer that the type a
should be Natural
for each element. You can read that type as saying that
there exists
a Type
that we could assign to a
that would make the type
work, but we don't care which one.
You don't need type annotations when the types of values exactly match, but you do require type annotations to unify types when one type is a proper subtype of another type.
For example, Natural
and Integer
are technically two separate types, so if
you stick both a positive and negative literal in a List
then type-checking
will fail:
$ grace interpret - <<< '[ 3, -2 ]'
Not a subtype
The following type:
Integer
(input):1:7:
│
1 │ [ 3, -2 ]
│ ↑
… cannot be a subtype of:
Natural
(input):1:3:
│
1 │ [ 3, -2 ]
│ ↑
… but if you add an explicit type annotation then type-checking will succeed:
$ grace interpret - <<< '[ 3, -2 ] : List Integer'
[ 3, -2 ]
There is one type that is a supertype of all types, which is
exists (a : Type) . a
(sometimes denoted ⊤
in the literature), so you can
always unify two disparate types, no matter how different, by giving them that
type annotation:
$ grace interpret - <<< '[ { }, \x -> x ] : List (exists (a : Type) . a)'
[ { }, \x -> x ]
Note that if you existentially quantify a value's type then you can't do anything meaningful with that value; it is now a black box as far as the language is concerned.
The interpreter can infer polymorphic types for open records, too. For example:
$ grace interpret --annotate - <<< '\x -> x.foo'
(\x -> x.foo) : forall (a : Type) . forall (b : Fields) . { foo: a, b } -> a
You can read that type as saying that \x -> x.foo
is a function from a record
with a field named foo
to the value of that field. The function type also
indicates that the function works no matter what type of value is present within
the foo
field and also works no matter what other fields might be present
within the record x
.
You can also use existential quantification to unify records with mismatched sets of fields. For example, the following list won't type-check without a type annotation because the fields don't match:
$ grace interpret - <<< '[ { x: 1, y: true }, { x: 2, z: "" } ]'
Record type mismatch
The following record type:
{ z: Text }
(input):1:22:
│
1 │ [ { x: 1, y: true }, { x: 2, z: "" } ]
│ ↑
… is not a subtype of the following record type:
{ y: Bool }
(input):1:3:
│
1 │ [ { x: 1, y: true }, { x: 2, z: "" } ]
│ ↑
The former record has the following extra fields:
• z
… while the latter record has the following extra fields:
• y
… but if we're only interested in the field named x
then we can use a
type annotation to tell the type-checker to ignore all of the other fields by
existentially quantifying them:
[ { x: 1, y: true }, { x: 2, z: "" } ]
: List (exists (a : Fields) . { x: Natural, a })
We can still write a function that consumes this list so long as the function
only accesses the field named x
:
let values
: exists (a : Fields) . List { x: Natural, a }
= [ { x: 1, y: true }, { x: 2, z: "" } ]
in List/map (\record -> record.x) values
The compiler also infers universally quantified types for union alternatives, too. For example:
$ grace interpret --annotate - <<< '[ Left 1, Right true ]'
[ Left 1, Right true ]
: forall (a : Alternatives) . List < Left: Natural | Right: Bool | a >
The type is universally quantified over the extra union alternatives, meaning that the union is "open" and we can keep adding new alternatives. We don't need to specify the desired type or set of alternatives in advance.
You can make all sorts of weird expressions type-check by adding a type
annotation of JSON
:
[ true, 1, [ -2, false, "" ], null, { foo: { } } ] : JSON
… but the only way you can consume an expression of type JSON
is to use
JSON/fold
, which has the following type:
JSON/fold
: forall (a : Type) .
{ array: List a -> a
, bool: Bool -> a
, real: Real -> a
, integer: Integer -> a
, natural: Natural -> a
, "null": a
, object: List { key: Text, value: a } -> a
, string: Text -> a
} ->
JSON ->
a
This is similar in spirit to a merge
expression where you need to specify how
to handle every possible case that the JSON value could possibly be.
For example, the following expression
JSON/fold
{ "bool": \b -> if b then 1 else 0
, "natural": \x -> x
, "integer": Integer/abs
, "real": \_ -> 1
, "string": \_ -> 2
, "null": 3
, "object": List/length
, "array": List/fold { nil: 0, cons: \x -> \y -> x + y : Natural }
}
[ true, 1, [ -2, false, "" ], null, { foo: { } } ]
… evaluates to 10
.
There is no other way to consume a JSON
value other than to specify how to
handle every single case, because once you annotate a value as having type
JSON
then the interpreter can no longer guarantee that the value is a List
,
record, or a specific scalar value. This is why you should prefer to use a
more precise type annotation if possible and only use JSON
as a type
annotation as a last resort.
Grace has two ways to import expressions from other sources: Filepath-based imports and imports using URIs.
You can import a Grace subexpression stored within a separate file by referencing the file's relative or absolute path.
For example, instead of having one large expression like this:
[ { name: "Cake donut"
, batters: [ "Regular", "Chocolate", "Blueberry", "Devil's Food" ]
, topping: [ "None"
, "Glazed"
, "Sugar"
, "Powdered Sugar"
, "Chocolate with Sprinkles"
, "Chocolate"
, "Maple"
]
}
, { name: "Raised donut"
, batters: [ "Regular" ]
, topping: [ "None", "Glazed", "Sugar", "Chocolate", "Maple" ]
}
, { name: "Old Fashioned donut"
, batters: [ "Regular", "Chocolate" ]
, topping: [ "None", "Glazed", "Chocolate", "Maple" ]
}
]
… you can split the expression into smaller files:
# ./cake.ffg
{ name: "Cake donut"
, batters: [ "Regular", "Chocolate", "Blueberry", "Devil's Food" ]
, topping: [ "None"
, "Glazed"
, "Sugar"
, "Powdered Sugar"
, "Chocolate with Sprinkles"
, "Chocolate"
, "Maple"
]
}
# ./raised.ffg
{ name: "Raised donut"
, batters: [ "Regular" ]
, topping: [ "None", "Glazed", "Sugar", "Chocolate", "Maple" ]
}
# ./old-fashioned.ffg
{ name: "Old Fashioned donut"
, batters: [ "Regular", "Chocolate" ]
, topping: [ "None", "Glazed", "Chocolate", "Maple" ]
}
… and then reference them within a larger file, like this:
[ ./cake.ffg
, ./raised.ffg
, ./old-fashioned.ffg
]
You can also import functions in this way, too. For example:
# ./greet.ffg
\name -> "Hello, " + name + "!"
$ grace interpret - <<< './greet.ffg "John"'
"Hello, John!"
Any subexpression can be imported in this way.
Imports with URIs work similar to the ones using a simple filepath.
Suppose you do not have the greet.ffg
stored locally but instead it resides
on a web server: http://example.com/grace/greet.ffg
You could either download it and reference it by its filepath like demonstrated
in the example above or let the Grace interpreter do the job:
$ grace interpret - <<< 'http://example.com/grace/greet.ffg "John"'
"Hello, John!"
Grace supports the following URI schemes:
-
HTTP:
https://…
orhttp://…
$ grace interpret - <<< 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Gabriel439/grace/5b3c0e11ee4776a42c26c1986bef8a17dd329e2e/prelude/bool/not.ffg true' false
-
Files:
file:…
$ grace interpret - <<< 'file:/path/to/greet.ffg "John"'
"Hello, John!"
-
Environment variables:
env:…
$ MY_VAR='"Hello !"' grace interpret - <<< 'env:MY_VAR'
"Hello !"
You can import a small standard library of utilities from the following URL:
These utilities provide higher-level functionality that wraps the underlying builtins.
Here is an example of how to use the Prelude:
let prelude =
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Gabriel439/grace/main/prelude/package.ffg
in prelude.bool.not true
The Prelude is organized as a large and nested record that you can import. Each sub-package of the Prelude is a top-level field, and the utilities are nested fields within each sub-package.
You can also directly import the utility you need, which is faster since it only requires a single HTTP request:
let not =
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Gabriel439/grace/main/prelude/bool/not.ffg
in not true
Like all of my programming language projects, Grace is named after a character from PlaneScape: Torment, specifically Fall-from-Grace, because Grace is about slaking the intellectual lust of people interested in programming language theory.
The name of this interpreter conflicts with another programming language, so use the longer name, "Fall-from-Grace", to disambiguate when it's not clear from the context. Either way, you'll want to rename this project when you fork it.