Skip to content

Experiments with the 2012 Kaggle job recommender challenge in Neo4J / Graphinius / GCNs

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

Graphinius/graphinius-job-recommender

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

8 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

job-recommender

Experiments with the 2012 Kaggle job recommender challenge in Neo4J / Graphinius / GCNs

preliminary runs

{
  mode: 2,
  nr_nodes: 1481806,
  nr_und_edges: 1603112,
  nr_dir_edges: 0,
  density_dir: 0,
  density_und: 0.0000014601970134727935,
  typed_nodes: { GENERIC: 0, USER: 389709, JOB: 1092097 },
  typed_edges: { GENERIC: 0, APPLIED_TO: 1603112 }
}
BFS on ~3M object graph took 2727 ms.
DFS on ~3M object graph took 18520 ms.
PFS on ~3M object graph took 2770 ms.
Pagerank on ~1.4M  node graph took 112570 ms.

Improvements

  • Why is DFS so slow compared to B/PFS?
  • PR seems to be leaking memory...???
  • Implement leaner (non-CB-based) versions of those algorithms
  • Implement parallel versions of all those algorithms
  • Implement TF-Based versions of those algorithms

About

Experiments with the 2012 Kaggle job recommender challenge in Neo4J / Graphinius / GCNs

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published