Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a variety of fixes and improvements to WPPF #1728

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

Add a variety of fixes and improvements to WPPF #1728

merged 10 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024

Conversation

psavery
Copy link
Collaborator

@psavery psavery commented Sep 25, 2024

This includes a tree view, an undo button, a new picker for spline points, and several other fixes.

Depends on: HEXRD/hexrd#719

psavery and others added 10 commits September 5, 2024 15:35
We don't want them showing up in the spline as 0, since that
is not actually a part of the background and can mess up the
background...

Signed-off-by: Patrick Avery <patrick.avery@kitware.com>
Previously, if the user ran WPPF without making "Scale" refinable
in the first iteration, the azimuthal integration scale would become
very zoomed out (in y) since the WPPF points would often be extremely
large. This would be difficult to fix since future refinements did
not scale the y-axis down.

This commit adds an autoscaling that ignores the WPPF scatter points, and
that keeps it zoomed in on the line data.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Avery <patrick.avery@kitware.com>
The spline method requires picking background points. This was previously
being done with pylab in hexrd. However, this is a deprecated module, and
it required the use of middle click (which not everyone had access to). It
also would make points appear while doing things such as pan/zoom.

The new point picker solves all of these issues.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Avery <patrick.avery@kitware.com>
Rietveld can only have one refinement step. Make it clear that is
what we are doing by setting it to 1.

Before, it would be grayed out, but could be set to something other than 1.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Avery <patrick.avery@kitware.com>
This converts the WPPF table view into a tree view instead, that
follows the same patterns as those found in the calibration workflow.

As far as I can tell, everything seems to be working properly...

Signed-off-by: Patrick Avery <patrick.avery@kitware.com>
Signed-off-by: Brianna Major <brianna.major@taloid.khq.kitware.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Avery <patrick.avery@kitware.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Avery <patrick.avery@kitware.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Avery <patrick.avery@kitware.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Avery <patrick.avery@kitware.com>
Copy link
Member

@saransh13 saransh13 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@psavery psavery merged commit 83fbb0f into master Sep 26, 2024
9 checks passed
@psavery psavery deleted the wppf-fixes branch September 26, 2024 02:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants