Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

faktura och swish i Resource PaymentReconciliation R5 #64

Open
annarossander opened this issue Jan 29, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

faktura och swish i Resource PaymentReconciliation R5 #64

annarossander opened this issue Jan 29, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@annarossander
Copy link

annarossander commented Jan 29, 2024

resursen PaymentReconciliation: https://hl7.org/fhir/R5/paymentreconciliation.html
under elementet .method finns extensible kodverk: https://terminology.hl7.org/5.1.0/ValueSet-v2-0570.html

VGR saknar möjlighet att ange faktura och swish som betalningsmetod.

@vadi2
Copy link
Contributor

vadi2 commented Jan 29, 2024

What is the context for this?

@annarossander
Copy link
Author

From the integration architect who raised the user need in VGR. Are you ok with Swedish or do you want me to translate?

"Vi använder FHIR resurserna PaymentNotice och PaymentReconciliation vid självincheckning för en patient.
När en patient använt självincheckningssystemet för att checka in och betala för ett besök, skickas används FHIR resursen PaymentNotice för att leverera information om patientens incheckning och betalning, från självincheckningssystemet till journal/kärnsystemet.
FHIR resursen PaymentNotice refererar till en PaymentReconciliation resurs, som innehåller elementet ”method”. I detta element kan man specificera om en betalning gjorts med ”Cash”, ”Credit Card”, ”Check” osv.
Dock saknas möjligheten att ange om betalningen utförts med Swish eller faktura.
"

@vadi2
Copy link
Contributor

vadi2 commented Jan 29, 2024

That is fine, thanks!

@peturv
Copy link
Contributor

peturv commented Mar 7, 2024

There have been some scattered discussions on what should be included in the base profiles. PaymentReconciliation is a profile that will possibly have a wide variety of stakeholders/implementers and a level of complexity that will grow quickly if it is to be handled centrally. If we are to include PaymentReconciliation, I believe minimal changes for the swedish scenario would be preferred. But to start handling value set for different payment types seems out of scope for a base profile.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants