Update codecov config

[martijnrusschen]

It seems the previous config was still using a tokenless config

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.04%. Comparing base (ff3607c) to head (0e9ef69).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4816   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.04%   96.04%           
=======================================
  Files          28       28           
  Lines        2882     2882           
  Branches     1245     1245           
=======================================
  Hits         2768     2768           
  Misses        114      114           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[martijnrusschen]

Fixed this based on https://docs.codecov.com/docs/github-2-getting-a-codecov-account-and-uploading-coverage

[pullrequest]

✅ This pull request was sent to the PullRequest network for review. Expert reviewers are now being matched to your request based on the code's requirements. Stay tuned!

What to expect from this code review:

• Comments posted to any areas of potential concern or improvement.
• Detailed feedback or actions needed to resolve issues that are found.
• Turnaround times vary, but we aim to be swift.

---

Check the status or cancel PullRequest code review here - or - cancel by adding [!pr] to the title of the pull request.

[pullrequest]

PullRequest Breakdown

Reviewable lines of change

+ 2
- 1

100% GitHubActions (tests)

Type of change

Minor Update - These changes appear to be a minor update to existing functionality and features.

[pullrequest]

Loading the token as an environment variable instead of a step input parameter looks good to me. No issues stand out here, and both approaches seem valid per https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action.

Mark M

---

Reviewed with ❤️ by PullRequest

[martijnrusschen]

For some reason the previous config didn't see the token passed in and was using the tokenless upload function. Very strange both seem to be supported, but I can see in the CI run that it's using the token now.