Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update our geometry and model interface to be more general/organized #67

Open
nickkamp1 opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #71
Open

Update our geometry and model interface to be more general/organized #67

nickkamp1 opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #71
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@nickkamp1
Copy link
Collaborator

Modify the interaction loading interface to operate similarly to the geometry/flux loading interfaces, i.e. point to a loader .py file in the appropriate resources/CrossSections/[model] directory which handles them model-specific arguments, etc

Also have a separate method for loading detector geometries that accepts either a string referring toa pre-defined experiment or paths to user-defined density/material files

@nickkamp1 nickkamp1 added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 15, 2024
@austinschneider austinschneider linked a pull request Sep 12, 2024 that will close this issue
@austinschneider
Copy link
Collaborator

#71 will fix at least the first half of this. We still need to add functionality for pointing to user files/directories.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants