-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Version 1 Demo #1
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
hyperlint review
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
README.md
Here's the summary of the review.
Metric | Value |
---|---|
readability score | 47.79 |
readability description | 47.79 - Hard to read. |
long sentences | ['This chnge only exists to be able to show off what a review looks like and what kind of information you should expect back from a review.'] |
adverbs | ['only', 'back'] |
passive voice sentences | 0 |
Summary of Proposed Changes
- Markdown Link Syntax: The incorrect markdown link format has been corrected to ensure readers can access the documentation without confusion.
- Spelling and Grammar: The misspelled word 'chnge' has been corrected to 'change'. Additionally, sentence structures have been improved for better clarity and formality.
- Tone and Flow: Efforts have been made to enhance the overall flow and maintain a tone consistent with standard technical documentation.
Recommendations for Future Improvements
- Proofreading: Prior to submitting documentation, thorough proofreading should be conducted to catch spelling and formatting errors.
- Consistency: Maintain a formal and professional tone throughout the document to align with the expected standards of technical documentation.
- Clarity: Ensure that sentence structures are clear and facilitate easy understanding for the reader.
# Demo | ||
|
||
This is a demonstration repository for the Hyperlint product. For more information, you should read [the documentation(https://docs.hyperlint.com/). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed the markdown link syntax, improved sentence structure for clarity, and used a more formal tone.
This is a demonstration repository for the Hyperlint product. For more information, you should read [the documentation(https://docs.hyperlint.com/). | |
This repository serves as a demonstration for the Hyperlint product. For detailed information, please refer to [the official documentation](https://docs.hyperlint.com/). |
This is a demonstration repository for the Hyperlint product. For more information, you should read [the documentation(https://docs.hyperlint.com/). | ||
|
||
This chnge only exists to be able to show off what a review looks like and what kind of information you should expect back from a review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Corrected the spelling of 'change', improved sentence structure for clarity, and used a more formal and precise language.
This chnge only exists to be able to show off what a review looks like and what kind of information you should expect back from a review. | |
This change exists solely to illustrate what a review looks like and to provide an example of the feedback you can expect from the review process. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hyperlint Summary Review for PR
Metrics
Metric | Description | Value |
---|---|---|
Writing Quality Rating | The rating from 1 to 10 of the writing quality of the content. (Mean) | 5.0 |
High (🔥) Severity Issues | Number of high severity issues we idenitfied. (Sum) | 0 |
Hyperlint Review for README.md
Review of the Content
👈(click to expand)
We rate this content quality as a 5/10.
To improve the writing quality, focus on using active voice consistently, ensuring clear and concise sentences, and fixing grammatical errors.
To improve the writing quality, focus on using active voice consistently, ensuring clear and concise sentences, and fixing grammatical errors.
- Inconsistency (medium Severity) Change to active voice and capitalize the first letter.
- -# demo
+ - # Demo
- Inconsistency (medium Severity) Correct spelling and improve clarity.
- This chnge only exists to be able to show off what a review looks like and what kind of information you should expect back from a review.
+ This change is solely for demonstrating a review and the expected feedback.
hyperlint review