Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor BundleReferenceStrategy into Bundle #4124

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 5, 2024

Conversation

reaganjlee
Copy link
Contributor

@reaganjlee reaganjlee commented Oct 4, 2024

Splits up #4084

The Bundle class will now internally use references instead of the values themselves, as BundleReferenceStrategy did previously, which should remove some of complexity around having two different points where we convert internal references to user outputs. Hopefully this helps split things up!

Copy link
Member

@Zac-HD Zac-HD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, thanks @reaganjlee!

The failures on Python 3.13 are our build system falling behind the latest release candidate version; I'll bump that this weekend. (or if you want to try make upgrade-requirements, that might do the trick)

RELEASE.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@reaganjlee
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hm looks like there needs to be a different bump outside the base make upgrade-requirements, so I'll just wait on that!

Copy link
Member

@Zac-HD Zac-HD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your branch was about three months behind master, so I had to rebase before running make upgrade-requirements (because the types-pkg_resources package had been yanked, and we dropped it here).

But with that I think we're ready to merge, and then we can rebase #4084 for easier review 🙂

@Zac-HD Zac-HD merged commit 8e1806d into HypothesisWorks:master Oct 5, 2024
56 checks passed
@reaganjlee
Copy link
Contributor Author

reaganjlee commented Oct 5, 2024

Ah, thanks for that! Will make those changes on the the other PR 🙂

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants