Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Community filter behaviour is confusing #6

Open
amb26 opened this issue Jul 15, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Community filter behaviour is confusing #6

amb26 opened this issue Jul 15, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@amb26
Copy link
Member

amb26 commented Jul 15, 2022

Whilst it was specifically requested during the design phase, the behaviour whereby we apply a taxon filter to a much coarser ecological community than the visible one on the map is very confusing. For example, we select "Pond" which is highlighted on the map, but we then get the taxa filtered to the entire "Freshwater" community.

This is really not what a user will expect, but I believe the issue is that our observation records don't have sufficiently accurate georeferencing to guarantee that they are assigned to the correct community, especially if it is a geographically small one like "Pond". We should rethink how this interaction works, perhaps by highlighting geographical features separately at the different granularities.

@dayotte
Copy link

dayotte commented Oct 3, 2022

Not sure what you mean here @amb26: "perhaps by highlighting geographical features separately at the different granularities."

Additionally confusing is that the panel subheading and image match the granular selection (e.g. Pond), but all other panel content (Cultural Values, Ecological Values) match the Community (e.g. Freshwater)

@dayotte
Copy link

dayotte commented Oct 3, 2022

Some design ideas that I will mock up:

  • only allow selection of the Communities on the map (but keep the sub-communities in the legend)

OR

  • Make it clear that the “sub-community” (what can we call this?) e.g. Pond, is what is being shown in the photo - possibly put the sub-community header under the photo and above/before the Community header
  • In this way the Community (Freshwater) header will also be more clearly connected to the Cultural/Ecological Values text content (as it comes immediately after/below)
  • Highlight the high-level Community on the map legend (in addition to the sub-community). Similar yellow highlighting but we need a visual indicator other than just colour here too, and 2 checkmarks might be confusing. Maybe some kind of connector line between the two.
  • Add a Community header to the Biodiversity panel (for the lists as well as web) so that it’s clear what is being shown there

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants