Skip to content

IlliaOvcharenko/lung-segmentation

Repository files navigation

🇺🇦 Support Ukraine

"how to" instruction

🦉 Lung segmentation

Data and task description

data-example

Dataset consists of collected from public available chest X-Ray (CXR) images. Overall amount of images is 800 meanwhile labeled only 704 of them. Whole dataset was randomly divided into train (0.8 of total) validation (0.1 splited from train) and test parts. Splits were saved into splits.pk.

The main task is to implement pixel-wise segmentation on the available data to detect lung area. Download link on the dataset https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ffbbyoPf-I3Y0iGbBahXpWqYdGd7xxQQ/view.

Proposed solution

The most obvious solution for semantic segmentation problems is UNet - fully convolutional network with an encoder-decoder path. High-resolution features from the contracting path are combined with the upsampled output in order to predict more precise output based on this information, which is the main idea of this architecture.

Softmax function was applied to model output and negative log-likelihood loss was used to train network. Optimization criterion - Adam with 0.0005 learning rate.

Some kinds of data augmentation were used: horizontal and vertical shift, minor zoom and padding. All images and masks were resized to 512x512 size before passing the network. To improve performance was decided to use pretrained on ImageNet encoder from vgg11 network. This approach slightly improves performance and greatly accelerate network convergence. Vanilla unet configuration doesn't have batch normalization. Nowadays it is used almost every time, so it was added to improve network convergence too. Such network configuration outperforms other variations of unet without batch norm and pretrained weights on validation dataset so it was chosen for final evaluation

Networks were trained on a batch of 4 images during more than 50 epochs on average.

After 40 epoch network stops to improve validation score and network began to overfit.

Weights with best validation scores were saved into models/ folder. Weights description:

  • unet-2v: simple unet + augmentation
Best epoch
epoch: 30/200, time: 156.41338729858398, train loss: 0.047798131544717216, 
val loss: 0.06580803386474911, val jaccard: 0.9143155990985402, val dice: 0.9541912308910436
epochs: 159, overall time: 413.0m, mean epoch time: 156.15773498037325s
test loss: 0.0634, test jaccard: 0.9110, test dice: 0.9520
  • unet-6v: pretrained vgg11 encoder + batch_norm + bilinear upscale + augmentation
Best epoch
epoch: 44/100, time: 135.7923891544342, train loss: 0.04682422929955094, 
val loss: 0.06021084505737873, val jaccard: 0.9213985225610566, val dice: 0.9580973742301004
epochs: 100, overall time: 227.0m, mean epoch time: 136.41898714780808s
test loss: 0.0530, test jaccard: 0.9268, test dice: 0.9611

Implementation of the described above solution using PyTorch you could find in scr/ folder and main.ipynb notebook.

Evaluation

For evaluation of model output was Jaccard and Dice metrics, well known for such kind of computer vision tasks. Jaccard also is known as Intersection over Union, while Dice is the same with F1 measure. They are both showing almost the same things - overlap between ground truth and calculated mask.

The main disadvantage is that they consider only the number of true positives, false positives and false negatives and ignore predicted location. So, more reasonable is to use average contour distance and average surface distance. These metrics are not implemented yet, more information about them you could find in "Accurate Lung Segmentation via Network-WiseTraining of Convolutional Networks" preprint, check out references list.

Evaluation was performed on test dataset, which was not used during training phase.

There are the best-achived results: Jaccard score - 0.9268, Dice score - 0.9611.

Some you obtained results could see on the figure below.

obtained-results

Next steps

There are some future steps on the way to improve the current solution:

  • implement k-fold cross validation
  • use transposed convolution instead of bilinear upscaling
  • try more powerful encoder (i.e. resnet)

References

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published