Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Standartise all the issue labels and make them beautiful #12

Open
worthant opened this issue Aug 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Standartise all the issue labels and make them beautiful #12

worthant opened this issue Aug 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
repo structure Extra attention is needed

Comments

@worthant
Copy link
Member

For example, i don't really like default github labels
Wee ned not quantity, but quality and easy visibiliy

Example of the labels from my work repo:
изображение

Example of the labels from my web1 lab:
изображение

They're far from perfect, i need your ideas on it

@worthant worthant added enhancement New feature or request documentation Improvements or additions to documentation repo structure Extra attention is needed and removed enhancement New feature or request documentation Improvements or additions to documentation labels Aug 30, 2023
@owl-from-hogvarts
Copy link
Member

IMO, current list of labels in this repo seems pretty good already. Could you clarify what Invalid label means?

@worthant
Copy link
Member Author

worthant commented Sep 3, 2023

IMO, current list of labels in this repo seems pretty good already. Could you clarify what Invalid label means?

That's what i'm saying. It's not mine label, it is github's.

It's clear, that those labels purpose are some specific open-source, but they don't suit us that good.

That's why i thought of creating out 'template repository' with standartised labels, license and everything

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
repo structure Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants