Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Alternate Bcat Taxonomy proposal #107

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

patmmccann
Copy link
Contributor

Attempts to solve the popularity of the legacy, deprecated content taxonomy 1.0 in the bcat field.

@wittjill
Copy link
Contributor

Hey Patrick, the bcat category can actually be modified by the cattax value in open rtb 2.6: https://iabtechlab.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/OpenRTB-2-6_FINAL.pdf
So I think all we would need to do is an ADCOM release to add ad product taxonomy 1.1 to the Category Taxonomy List: https://github.com/InteractiveAdvertisingBureau/AdCOM/blob/master/AdCOM%20v1.0%20FINAL.md#list_categorytaxonomies

@patmmccann
Copy link
Contributor Author

That doesn't solve the problem; if we put an updated bcat taxonomy in that field no one would currently understand our bcats, as everyone has built tooling on iab tax 1. It seems we are stuck on tax 1 forever without this proposal or a similar solution.

@iantri
Copy link
Collaborator

iantri commented Sep 15, 2023

Couple questions:

"The taxonomy migration problem has already been solved in publisher content categorization, with publishers or exchanges able to specify content categories on multiple simultaneous taxonomies." -- I do not believe this to be the case in the mainline OpenRTB spec, can you advise?

I'm having a bit of trouble getting my head around this replace/append concept and the reference to "any stored list associated with that requestor". Can you elaborate on what's intended with this?

@patmmccann
Copy link
Contributor Author

patmmccann commented Sep 15, 2023

I do not believe this to be the case in the mainline OpenRTB spec, can you advise?

This is true in https://github.com/InteractiveAdvertisingBureau/openrtb/blob/master/extensions/community_extensions/segtax.md which is incorporated in https://iabtechlab.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/IAB-Tech-Lab-Taxonomy-and-Data-Transparency-Standards-to-Support-Seller-defined-Audience-and-Context-Signaling.pdf and referenced for content taxonomy on pages 13 and 14

image

image

replace / append

This is entirely severable. However, this is the basic idea, using badv as an example: If a publisher tells an ssp badv = ['prebid.org'] they may wish to also say 'append that to the list I already gave you for my account' or 'replace the list, this is the only badv'. We're finding a similar concept is useful in bcats.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants