We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Restarting the notebook ("Restart and run all cells") and waiting for the output of the first cell (containing just 1) takes about 10 seconds.1
1
For comparison, doing the same in a Python notebook takes about 2.7 seconds (i.e. not orders of magnitude off, but still a significant difference).
I wonder what that time is spent on (but don't immediately see how to profile this), and how it could be improved.
In the terminal:
julia> @time using IJulia 0.806597 seconds (293.19 k allocations: 19.490 MiB, 2.50% compilation time)
and Julia itself:
$ time julia -e "print(1)" 1 real 0m0.320s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.000s
Similar issue (but 8 years old and closed, so not resuscitating that):
Info:
versioninfo()
Julia Version 1.9.0-beta3 Commit 24204a7344 (2023-01-18 07:20 UTC) Platform Info: OS: Windows (x86_64-w64-mingw32) CPU: 8 × Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10510U CPU @ 1.80GHz WORD_SIZE: 64 LIBM: libopenlibm LLVM: libLLVM-14.0.6 (ORCJIT, skylake) Threads: 7 on 8 virtual cores Environment: JULIA_EDITOR = code.cmd JULIA_NUM_THREADS = 7
This test was ran with Julia 1.9.0-beta3. I re-ran the stopwatch test in 1.9.3, and the time seems to have been reduced to 8.6 seconds. ↩
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Restarting the notebook ("Restart and run all cells") and waiting for the output of the first cell (containing just
1
) takes about 10 seconds.1For comparison, doing the same in a Python notebook takes about 2.7 seconds (i.e. not orders of magnitude off, but still a significant difference).
I wonder what that time is spent on (but don't immediately see how to profile this), and how it could be improved.
In the terminal:
and Julia itself:
Similar issue (but 8 years old and closed, so not resuscitating that):
Info:
versioninfo()
:Footnotes
This test was ran with Julia 1.9.0-beta3. I re-ran the stopwatch test in 1.9.3, and the time seems to have been reduced to 8.6 seconds. ↩
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: