Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(cli): clippy errors in tests #330

Merged

Conversation

Donach
Copy link
Contributor

@Donach Donach commented Jul 26, 2024

  • Add dead_code flag to footer and raw of Message struct

Why

When I run clippy with few parameters, I'm getting errors on the tests where unnecessary mut is defined.
That is not proper way to declare variables in Rust, so as best practice should be avoided even in test code.

This is the command to show the errors on main branch:
cargo clippy --workspace --keep-going --all-targets -- -D warnings

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new fields to the Message struct for enhanced commit message metadata.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified initialization of various structs in test cases for improved readability and reduced code complexity.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Ensured that the functionality of the tests remains unchanged while enhancing code clarity.

- Add dead_code flag to footer and raw of Message struct
@Donach Donach requested a review from KeisukeYamashita as a code owner July 26, 2024 06:18
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the Message struct by introducing new fields for capturing additional metadata in commit messages. This allows for a more comprehensive representation of commit details. Additionally, several struct initializations within tests have been streamlined for better readability and brevity, adhering to idiomatic Rust practices while preserving original functionality.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/message.rs Added footers (optional HashMap) and raw (String) fields to Message struct.
src/rule/description_format.rs Refactored test struct initialization for DescriptionFormat using concise struct literals.
src/rule/scope.rs Simplified Scope struct initialization in tests with direct construction syntax.
src/rule/scope_format.rs Enhanced test initialization for ScopeFormat using idiomatic struct initialization.
src/rule/type.rs Refactored Type struct initialization in tests for improved clarity and conciseness.
src/rule/type_format.rs Simplified TypeFormat struct initialization in tests, promoting a functional style.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test
    participant Message
    
    Test->>Message: Initialize with footers and raw fields
    Message-->>Test: Return initialized Message
Loading

🐇 "In code we hop, with changes bright,
New fields and structs bring pure delight.
With every line, clarity grows,
A message of joy, as the rabbit knows!
So here’s to the tweaks we made today,
Hopping along in a Rusty way!" 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2755233 and 3a08bf8.

Files selected for processing (6)
  • src/message.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/rule/description_format.rs (3 hunks)
  • src/rule/scope.rs (4 hunks)
  • src/rule/scope_format.rs (3 hunks)
  • src/rule/type.rs (4 hunks)
  • src/rule/type_format.rs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • src/rule/description_format.rs
  • src/rule/scope.rs
  • src/rule/type.rs
  • src/rule/type_format.rs
Additional comments not posted (5)
src/message.rs (2)

27-29: LGTM! But verify the field usage in the codebase.

The addition of the footers field enhances the Message struct's ability to encapsulate more comprehensive commit message data.

However, ensure that the footers field is used appropriately in the codebase.


31-33: LGTM! But verify the field usage in the codebase.

The addition of the raw field enhances the Message struct's ability to encapsulate more comprehensive commit message data.

However, ensure that the raw field is used appropriately in the codebase.

Verification successful

The raw field is actively used in the codebase.

The raw field is utilized in the new function for initializing the Message struct and in various validation rules across multiple files in the src/rule/ directory. This confirms that the field is not dead code and is appropriately integrated into the codebase.

  • Files and locations where raw is used:
    • src/message.rs
    • Multiple files within the src/rule/ directory
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `raw` field in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the field usage. Expect: Occurrences of `raw` field in the codebase.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'raw'

Length of output: 16640

src/rule/scope_format.rs (3)

81-84: LGTM!

The change enhances readability and eliminates the need for mutable state, promoting a more functional style of programming.


101-104: LGTM!

The change enhances readability and eliminates the need for mutable state, promoting a more functional style of programming.


127-130: LGTM!

The change enhances readability and eliminates the need for mutable state, promoting a more functional style of programming.

Copy link
Owner

@KeisukeYamashita KeisukeYamashita left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your PR!
Overall LGTM, I have one request!

src/message.rs Outdated
@@ -24,9 +24,11 @@ pub struct Message {
/// Description part of the commit message.
pub description: Option<String>,

#[allow(dead_code)]
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I recently added a rule for footers, so this is not dead anymore: #327

Could you remove it from this field?
Thank you!

@KeisukeYamashita KeisukeYamashita changed the title test: Fix clippy errors in tests test(cli): fix clippy errors in tests Jul 26, 2024
@KeisukeYamashita KeisukeYamashita changed the title test(cli): fix clippy errors in tests fix(cli): clippy errors in tests Jul 26, 2024
src/message.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3a08bf8 and 6946678.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/message.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/message.rs

Copy link
Owner

@KeisukeYamashita KeisukeYamashita left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you!!!

@KeisukeYamashita KeisukeYamashita merged commit fc74af5 into KeisukeYamashita:main Jul 26, 2024
12 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants