Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluate using Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) and LLVM BOLT #2191

Open
zamazan4ik opened this issue Oct 22, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Evaluate using Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) and LLVM BOLT #2191

zamazan4ik opened this issue Oct 22, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@zamazan4ik
Copy link

Hi!

Recently I checked Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) improvements on multiple projects. The results are here. E.g. PGO results for LLVM-related tooling are here. According to the tests, PGO usually helps with the compiler and compiler-like workloads (like static analysis) - e.g. Clang gets +20% compilation speed with PGO. That's why I think trying to optimize the SPIRV-LLVM translator with PGO can be a good idea.

I can suggest the following action points:

  • Perform PGO benchmarks on SPIRV-LLVM translator. And if it shows improvements - add a note about possible improvements in SPIRV-LLVM's translator performance with PGO.
  • Providing an easier way (e.g. a build option) to build scripts with PGO can be helpful for the end-users and maintainers since they will be able to optimize the SPIRV-LLVM translator according to their own workloads.
  • Optimize pre-built binaries (if any)

Testing Post-Link Optimization techniques (like LLVM BOLT) would be interesting too (Clang and Rustc already use BOLT as an addition to PGO) but I recommend starting from the usual PGO.

Here are some examples of how PGO optimization is integrated in other projects:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant